I'll wax Elizabethan on you.

Moderator: Mafia Mods
It was a late vote on a dominant bandwagon. But he followed you, and was followed by ksen for the final vote.irretating wrote:Yes. Yes, they do. As in, you decided in the first game night to start the irre case, and yes it was an easy target, given you can use the leverage of oblivion - and bili by association - who are already unsure of me. I was just waiting to see who would try to start stitching me up, and voila! you appeared. Why did you not have a vote down until very late in the day? *Adenosine wrote:Scum have easier targets to pick out.
*I'm pretty sure this is the case, because when bili asked if it was usual to have no-voters, it was you, mantis and diva all without a vote down.
LOL. Scum tell.Adenosine wrote:Yah well, I don' haf 2 do dat so dat's kewl.
Yeah, I get frustrated by always being seen as suspect, from the outset. It's like I have to rely on being viewed. I shouldn't have mentioned the possibility of you faking your impediment, even though the thought crossed my mind. I try to compress my game into the first game day, because if I'm town I'm half expecting to be killed overnight.oblivion wrote: this has happened to me before. When some of talkrational's better players stopped playing, my game became a lot more sloppy, especially my town game. and then suddenly players were all over me for shit that I didn't even realize I had done. At the same time, my game became more confrontational because there was a vacuum that needed to be filled. It took a multisided adjustment to get things back in line. I had to change things, and other players had to get used to what I wasn't going to change.
The crossover populations of ratz and TR bring different gamestyle expectations with them, and there's always an adjustment period. The vocal players wind up under the spotlight for a while.
Speaking of the denny vote that should read. He also was third vote on grit.Bilirubin wrote:It was a late vote on a dominant bandwagon. But he followed you, and was followed by ksen for the final vote.irretating wrote:Yes. Yes, they do. As in, you decided in the first game night to start the irre case, and yes it was an easy target, given you can use the leverage of oblivion - and bili by association - who are already unsure of me. I was just waiting to see who would try to start stitching me up, and voila! you appeared. Why did you not have a vote down until very late in the day? *Adenosine wrote:Scum have easier targets to pick out.
*I'm pretty sure this is the case, because when bili asked if it was usual to have no-voters, it was you, mantis and diva all without a vote down.
exceedingly affirmationalism. I could have written your post.irretating wrote:Yeah, I get frustrated by always being seen as suspect, from the outset. It's like I have to rely on being viewed. I shouldn't have mentioned the possibility of you faking your impediment, even though the thought crossed my mind. I try to compress my game into the first game day, because if I'm town I'm half expecting to be killed overnight.oblivion wrote: this has happened to me before. When some of talkrational's better players stopped playing, my game became a lot more sloppy, especially my town game. and then suddenly players were all over me for shit that I didn't even realize I had done. At the same time, my game became more confrontational because there was a vacuum that needed to be filled. It took a multisided adjustment to get things back in line. I had to change things, and other players had to get used to what I wasn't going to change.
The crossover populations of ratz and TR bring different gamestyle expectations with them, and there's always an adjustment period. The vocal players wind up under the spotlight for a while.
Anyhoo. I can't apologise to adenosine until if and when I find out I'm wrong. But, I'll stop going after him. My point was made about fifty posts ago.
The irony? I was trying to change my game this time around
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests