Mantis, I'm not saying you're guilty for sure. I'm saying that if one of you is guilty, both of you are likely guilty. Here's how the events might have played out:
Mantisdreamz wrote:Well being town I guess I will vote with the voting bloc as well
vote Mantisdreamz
Mantis tries to gain sympathy by voting for herself.
sifaka wrote:Sorry Mantis, I'm not convinced but I'll vote with the block:
Vote: Mantisdreamz
Sifaka, realizing that Mantis is going to be lynched, votes for her as she knows that a vote for the guilty Mantis will most likely vindicate her tomorrow.
Mantisdreamz wrote:irreligionist wrote:heyzeus wrote:by the way, I'm wondering if there's a point in hiding our roles anymore. Maybe revealing them can provide us with some good information.
Er... revealing all roles gives scum a nice order of priority for assassinations. I don't see the point in doing that.
Gah.. I'm over this voting today. Mantis voting for herself makes me feel bad. Could be ploy, but dunno.

Dah! Okay maybe don't post the roles then!? But what if there IS only one scum left. It wouldn't really matter, would it?
Here,
vote noncredo
That's what I think.
EDIT:
unvote Mantisdreamz
Mantis sees that her sympathy self-vote is not working and tries for a last-ditch effort to deflect the vote onto noncredo.
sifaka wrote:
Oh, bugger this! I'm not voting with the block, it doesn't make sense to get rid of an innocent.
I trust mantis, noncredo and MAT have not convinced me at all.
Too bad if this makes me look guilty.
Unvote: mantisdreamz
Vote: noncredo
Not too long later, Sifaka seeks to help deflect the guilt onto noncredo with a spurious "screw the block" justification.