Post
by Linus » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:17 pm
Trying to rank players based mostly on town tells, I usually don't have this much trouble coming up with a consistent list.
irre - win condition etc., initially inattentive, then said she made spreadsheet and dramatically improved, seemed to intend to log off without an active vote at the end of day 1, mostly townish
feck - would be in lower half if it weren't for win conditions etc.
amok - mostly looked genuine day 1, responded to irre's win condition comment, some less townish comments
athene - what she posts is reasonable, "clicked"/"partially clicked" day 1, I'm starting to seriously worry about what she doesn't post... very hard to place in the list, should probably move down
mz - more towny than scummy
rc - asked about randomization, a bit too focused on mantis BW
dp - gives "cold reading" suspicions of irre more weight than is reasonable, made spreadsheet of vote times
bnew - initially forgot mz & rc when listing familiar players, need more
gonzo - early votes could be reasonable attempts to get things started, first thought dp's reasoning about irre looked genuine but also had irre as clear, now has irre as suspicious & votes irre based on vote patterns; white-knighted DP but when pressed said he had him as "unsure"
shizzle - meh, has ignored questions about vote rationale
ksen - claims block, if town willing to risk block flavor info dying with him
I'll go with...
##vote shizzle##