Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
MissingNo.
Cheese is christ
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by MissingNo. » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:14 am

The goal of the serial killer was to cause chaos among both factions. I don't see why her win condition would be to kill Paul.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by Animavore » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:15 am

Maybe I should read those rules now :hehe:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
sifaka
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:15 am
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by sifaka » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:17 am

Animavore wrote:if I was given an Indie task that meant I won by picking off one person[/b] I wouldn't go trying to pick a random on the first night.
Don't be so sure about that, that's exactly what Lion (the PI) did in the first game. He used his one bullet on Starr who was an innocent.

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by Don't Panic » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:17 am

heyzeus wrote:The goal of the serial killer was to cause chaos among both factions. I don't see why her win condition would be to kill Paul.
From the storyline of the book it would be, but I think we need to remember that the game is only using the book as background.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
MissingNo.
Cheese is christ
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by MissingNo. » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:18 am

Err, sorry, it was to "weaken" both factions. Maybe you're right. From what I've seen, it seems like Paul is the main character in Dune? If he could be considered the "leader" of our faction, I could see how having him killed could be a weakening of our team.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by Animavore » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:19 am

This game is really confusing when you don't have a clue of the roles :banghead:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
CookieJon
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by CookieJon » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:20 am

Animavore wrote:
CookieJon wrote:
Animavore wrote:
DP wrote:Seems like a lucky guess to pick one player out of twenty and hit a probable major character.
I was wondering that. I mean if I was given an Indie task that meant I won by picking off one person I wouldn't go trying to pick a random on the first night.
Ani why do you say that? Where do you get the impression that the Indie task's aim was to "pick off one person" in particular?

In the last Mafia game, I noticed you deliberately "misunderstanding" rules and events, etc, and it appears you're doing the same again here.

Please explain!?
I can't be arsed reading the rules. That's why.
Someone said the Indie had an independent winning condition. I presumed the winning condition was to take out Paul, I could be wrong, but I don't see why it wouldn't be that.
I see. That's a fair assumption, I suppose.
Why did rezling go straight for Paul unless she had information?
Hmm. You're not making sense, and I know you're smarter than that...
1. Why assume the assassin only had one attack in the whole game?
2. Why do you say "go straight for Paul"? She didn't attack Paul.
3. Why say "unless she had information"? What information could she possibly have had, and even if there was any, it wasn't very good information since she got the wrong victim, which makes the question "Why go straight for Paul unless she had information?" redundant.

Something's fishy here.

User avatar
sifaka
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:15 am
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by sifaka » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:20 am

heyzeus wrote:Err, sorry, it was to "weaken" both factions. Maybe you're right. From what I've seen, it seems like Paul is the main character in Dune? If he could be considered the "leader" of our faction, I could see how having him killed could be a weakening of our team.
I agree with that, but how would it be a weakening of the scum team?

User avatar
95Theses
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by 95Theses » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:21 am

Righto

I am Ramallo, the Fremen Reverend Mother of Sietch Tabr. I am a truthsayer.

I can test peoples claims for truth.

I tested this claim :

Subject: Dune 2.0 Game Thread
irreligionist wrote:I have no idea why animavore is making this campaign against me. I'm with town.

As a sign of good faith I will not vote against animavore, but I would like him to stop thinking about a prior game - a prior life - and focus on the here and now. If he is with town, he needs to stop dividing the good people.

Mephistophiles - we honour your bravery and sacrifice.
Specifically the 'I am town' part and found it to be true.

Therefore Irre can be 100% trusted and I have just got quite valuable for the innocents.

I'd like to see every single person make an clear statement about who's side they are on in this game.

Anyone who can protect me should probably consider doing so at your earliest opportunity as I'm no doubt Scum target numero uno now.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by Animavore » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:21 am

CookieJon wrote:2. Why do you say "go straight for Paul"? She didn't attack Paul.
She did attack Paul but Paul had a bodyguard (Meph) who protected him.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
MissingNo.
Cheese is christ
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:10 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by MissingNo. » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:21 am

sifaka wrote:
heyzeus wrote:Err, sorry, it was to "weaken" both factions. Maybe you're right. From what I've seen, it seems like Paul is the main character in Dune? If he could be considered the "leader" of our faction, I could see how having him killed could be a weakening of our team.
I agree with that, but how would it be a weakening of the scum team?
It wouldn't. Maybe her goal was to kill the leaders of both teams.

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by virphen » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:22 am

I'm sticking with animavore unless extremely convincing evidence appears on someone else. He's spreading as much disinformation and confusion as he can.

Even if he's innocent if he keeps this up he's a liability.

User avatar
irreligionist
Peripheral participant
Posts: 2710
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:57 pm
About me: nothing really to tell
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by irreligionist » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:23 am

retract vote for 95theses

User avatar
CookieJon
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by CookieJon » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:23 am

Animavore wrote:
CookieJon wrote:2. Why do you say "go straight for Paul"? She didn't attack Paul.
She did attack Paul but Paul had a bodyguard (Meph) who protected him.
Oh yeah, sorry... you're right. :oops:

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Dune 2.0 Game Thread

Post by Animavore » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:24 am

Unvote 95theses
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests