Venture Bros: day 1

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Mantisdreamz » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:23 am

..so, iow - why drill him if you think he is town?

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:25 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:
gib wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:##vote UT##

gib - don't you think that as scum, MZ wouldn;t be pointing out and claiming that he's the same character as Matt?
i think both hanks are probably town, yes
I don't know about Matt... but, it seemed like you were drilling MZ. I just can't imagine scum claiming the same name.
is there a question in there for me somewhere?

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:30 am

gib wrote: you don't know how your own thought process worked?

shizz was pretty clear about how he thought trading himself as vt for a scum was a good deal
I don;t have to agree with what he claims is a good deal for town.
Do you think it's a good deal? Two town for....nothing?
Knee-jerk response was he's looking to take me down with him.
UT dug up multiple Hanks so I'm not so concerned.
Plus, I gave him "brave" he gave me back "fungible". There's no doubt he has the exact same character as me.

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:33 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:..so, iow - why drill him if you think he is town?
i don't follow his logic

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:34 am

irretating wrote:
andrewclunn wrote:
charlou wrote:Hello.

Anything about DP's gameplay so far that leads you to think he's a good choice for mayor, Andrew? :what:
The only other time I've played here scum was selected as mayor. I figure that since scum can subtly promote each other that a randomly selected mayor is just as good (better in fact because statistically you're going to choose town.) Of course if DP ends up being scum this will make me look bad, but them's the breaks. :dunno:
That game was weird, I've never seen so many scum push a mayor BW like that.

I'm gonna @@vote irre@@
Ok, this is the full context of Irre's self vote.

Irre asks for justifcation of Andrew's DP mayor vote
Andrew explains about random being as good a mechanism as any
Irre reminds about the scum being voted mayor by scum last game
Irre votes herself as mayor.

Seems like it's how I told it. Her justification for self voting is that scum got voted in last time. Where's the problem with that?

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:36 am

Magicziggy wrote:
gib wrote: you don't know how your own thought process worked?

shizz was pretty clear about how he thought trading himself as vt for a scum was a good deal
I don;t have to agree with what he claims is a good deal for town.
Do you think it's a good deal? Two town for....nothing?
Knee-jerk response was he's looking to take me down with him.
UT dug up multiple Hanks so I'm not so concerned.
Plus, I gave him "brave" he gave me back "fungible". There's no doubt he has the exact same character as me.
i was under the impression he thought you were scum at the time, not town, so yes it would have represented a great deal

fungible means interchangeable, not brave, so i don't get what you're saying here either

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:40 am

charlou you're virtually invisible this game - how do you think andrew's game is looking compared to the last one?

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by charlou » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:50 am

I'm reading, gib .. just taking in what people are saying for the moment.

Andrew's game compared with the last one ... still seems bold, but few posts to go on so far.
no fences

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:51 am

gib wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:
gib wrote: you don't know how your own thought process worked?

shizz was pretty clear about how he thought trading himself as vt for a scum was a good deal
I don;t have to agree with what he claims is a good deal for town.
Do you think it's a good deal? Two town for....nothing?
Knee-jerk response was he's looking to take me down with him.
UT dug up multiple Hanks so I'm not so concerned.
Plus, I gave him "brave" he gave me back "fungible". There's no doubt he has the exact same character as me.
i was under the impression he thought you were scum at the time, not town, so yes it would have represented a great deal

fungible means interchangeable, not brave, so i don't get what you're saying here either
You don't need to get it. Both fungible and brave are mentioned.

Dog with a bone.
##vote gib##

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:00 am

wtf

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:04 am

I'm exercising my legal right to point out that you are picking apart something that has an obvious cause. Two Hanks.

Now, why Irre? Make a case please.

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:04 am

Magicziggy wrote:I'm exercising my legal right to point out that you are picking apart something that has an obvious cause. Two Hanks.

Now, why Irre? Make a case please.
bollocks to you

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:06 am

gib wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:I'm exercising my legal right to point out that you are picking apart something that has an obvious cause. Two Hanks.

Now, why Irre? Make a case please.
bollocks to you
I've answered every question asked of me.

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by gib » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:16 am

Magicziggy wrote:
gib wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:I'm exercising my legal right to point out that you are picking apart something that has an obvious cause. Two Hanks.

Now, why Irre? Make a case please.
bollocks to you
I've answered every question asked of me.
make a nice clear case for why you think i'm scum so i can wave it in your stupid face later

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 1

Post by Magicziggy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:20 am

gib wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:
gib wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:I'm exercising my legal right to point out that you are picking apart something that has an obvious cause. Two Hanks.

Now, why Irre? Make a case please.
bollocks to you
I've answered every question asked of me.
make a nice clear case for why you think i'm scum so i can wave it in your stupid face later
I vote a lot. Get over it.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests