this is strange.Magicziggy wrote:Because either:irretating wrote:Why are you not immediately lynch voting him? You're both claiming the same character?Magicziggy wrote:Because I'm hank.irretating wrote:OK, you know we're going to ask you 'why?'Magicziggy wrote:I have good reason to believe Matt.
I have good reason to believe this is one weird arse game.
1) Linus has fucked up Matt's safe claim
or 2)Linus has fucked up the town roles
or 3) It's a weird arse game with identical characters
you don;t make up a word like fungible. It's why asked about hank.
It's not enough to condemn Matt though.
Venture Bros: day 1
Moderator: Mafia Mods
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Not really. There would be no reason for MZ as scum to claim the same character. Doesn;t say anything about Matt's claim though.Zigmen wrote:MZ, when you saw Shizz claim the same as your character, why was your first instinct to trust him?
General question: Would you have trusted Shizz if you were in MZ's spot?
I would not have.
IMHO, this makes MZ look equally if not more suspicious than Shizz.
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
mm.. i saw matt's claim as being more suspicious than mz'sUselesstwit wrote:agreed, which makes irre's reaction so very pingworthy. why vote shizzle instead or trying to figure out which one to trust. Along with the self voting, i'm just seeing her town game.Zigmen wrote:MZ, when you saw Shizz claim the same as your character, why was your first instinct to trust him?
General question: Would you have trusted Shizz if you were in MZ's spot?
I would not have.
IMHO, this makes MZ look equally if not more suspicious than Shizz.
##vote irre##
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
you thought a scum shizzle would draw attention to himself just to get a townie lynchedMagicziggy wrote:a scum move to get a town player to the lynch.gib wrote:explain to me what you were thinking here pleaseMagicziggy wrote:Now I have reason to lynch you.MattShizzle wrote:To reiterate if MZ was scum he'd be dumb to claim the same as me as once I was lynched and my role confirmed he'd be lynched - and 1 scum for 1 VT is good for town. I would almost say we should both be lynched but I wonder about weird roles. Town should still consider lynching both of us...
##vote Mattshizzle##
how does that work exactly?
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
##vote UT##
gib - don't you think that as scum, MZ wouldn;t be pointing out and claiming that he's the same character as Matt?
gib - don't you think that as scum, MZ wouldn;t be pointing out and claiming that he's the same character as Matt?
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Don't know. Why would a town player suggest lynching two town players? I'm not suggesting it.gib wrote:you thought a scum shizzle would draw attention to himself just to get a townie lynchedMagicziggy wrote:a scum move to get a town player to the lynch.gib wrote:explain to me what you were thinking here pleaseMagicziggy wrote:Now I have reason to lynch you.MattShizzle wrote:To reiterate if MZ was scum he'd be dumb to claim the same as me as once I was lynched and my role confirmed he'd be lynched - and 1 scum for 1 VT is good for town. I would almost say we should both be lynched but I wonder about weird roles. Town should still consider lynching both of us...
##vote Mattshizzle##
how does that work exactly?
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
good point. Matt - why did you say that?Magicziggy wrote:Don't know. Why would a town player suggest lynching two town players? I'm not suggesting it.
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
that's a terrible reason not to vote someoneMagicziggy wrote:Just read the thread backwards. Irre is voting for herself because scum got the don voted in last game.
Her vote on shizzle is bothering me. Its the complete logic fail about Matt's hank claim. She says it's more likely that the gm would fuck up a scum safe claim over a town role pm. That doesn't compute. I'd vote her if I didn't have the nagging suspicion she were trying to get lynched.
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Can't believe that Irre would string together to shaky town games back to back.gib wrote:that's a terrible reason not to vote someoneMagicziggy wrote:Just read the thread backwards. Irre is voting for herself because scum got the don voted in last game.
Her vote on shizzle is bothering me. Its the complete logic fail about Matt's hank claim. She says it's more likely that the gm would fuck up a scum safe claim over a town role pm. That doesn't compute. I'd vote her if I didn't have the nagging suspicion she were trying to get lynched.
But she's a possible for my vote.
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Why have none of you bunch of Hankers voted me for Mayor ? .
I find MZ 's thoughts in the order he posted them about Matt confusing and not at all natural for town (mind you natural around here is often freaky)
I find MZ 's thoughts in the order he posted them about Matt confusing and not at all natural for town (mind you natural around here is often freaky)




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
i think both hanks are probably town, yesMantisdreamz wrote:##vote UT##
gib - don't you think that as scum, MZ wouldn;t be pointing out and claiming that he's the same character as Matt?
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
That's because you aren't me.Feck wrote:Why have none of you bunch of Hankers voted me for Mayor ? .
I find MZ 's thoughts in the order he posted them about Matt confusing and not at all natural for town (mind you natural around here is often freaky)
Be grateful.
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
Can we assume that there is another Hank ? can we assume all Hanks are town ? 





Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
you don't know how your own thought process worked?Magicziggy wrote:Don't know. Why would a town player suggest lynching two town players? I'm not suggesting it.gib wrote:you thought a scum shizzle would draw attention to himself just to get a townie lynchedMagicziggy wrote:a scum move to get a town player to the lynch.gib wrote:explain to me what you were thinking here pleaseMagicziggy wrote: Now I have reason to lynch you.
##vote Mattshizzle##
how does that work exactly?
shizz was pretty clear about how he thought trading himself as vt for a scum was a good deal
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Venture Bros: day 1
I don't know about Matt... but, it seemed like you were drilling MZ. I just can't imagine scum claiming the same name.gib wrote:i think both hanks are probably town, yesMantisdreamz wrote:##vote UT##
gib - don't you think that as scum, MZ wouldn;t be pointing out and claiming that he's the same character as Matt?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests