The Innsmouth Look game thread.

[Linus]

Linus, do you have any reads on people?

Some. Mantis, rc, dp all had pretty large lapses of attention. I'm struggling to figure out if I believe that is role neutral or scummy, but when a player has <= 5 posts in total I could base a vote on that (there's still time for quiet players to speak up, though). I agree that Oblivion is making little sense and would add that she looks pretty insincere. b.t looks scummy too. If I were to set aside the quiet ones, I'd say that Oblivion and b.t make excellent BWs.

[irretating]

^ I have a known issue with trolley tracking on oblivion. I might err on giving her too much leeway.

Still, what about zigmen? He's not exactly making much sense.

[b.ternarius]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

[irretating]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Um, wot.

So you think that we should lynch the player who was under all the attention (for not much of a reason, given you yourself dropped a mayor vote without explanation), rather than players who are not making much sense?

[oblivion]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Hmm.

##unvote Athene##

##vote b.ternarius[/b]##

[oblivion]

grr.

##vote b.ternarius##

[Athene]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Did you think that Linus is scum?

[Uselesstwit]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Um, wot.

So you think that we should lynch the player who was under all the attention (for not much of a reason, given you yourself dropped a mayor vote without explanation), rather than players who are not making much sense?

really? what I got from b.tern was that we should get the vote done with and then look for scum. Either way I'm going to have to share the um, wot.

[Uselesstwit]

I can see a b.tern bw but i've been all over her in the ratskep game so I might have a bit of a bias on her atm.

[Linus]

^ I have a known issue with trolley tracking on oblivion. I might err on giving her too much leeway.

Still, what about zigmen? He's not exactly making much sense.

I agree that he isn't making sense, but I often think that. I'd prefer to judge him on his remarks about other players than me; if there's anything worrying about Zigmen, it is that he seems happy to focus exclusive on me.

[b.ternarius]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Um, wot.

So you think that we should lynch the player who was under all the attention (for not much of a reason, given you yourself dropped a mayor vote without explanation), rather than players who are not making much sense?

No, I think we should stop focussing on Linus and start looking at other people more closely, and find a better candidate for lynching. If that means climbing on a small bw, so be it. When I left earlier people were pretty much just talking about Linus.

[b.ternarius]

GEFGW?

good enough for government work.

b.t, that's a pretty laid back approach to day 1.

Yes, it seems so, but my day one experiences so far have indicated that these kinds of drawn out analyses of probably innocent posts prevent a lot of other commentary. I think scum love these, it's an easy place to hide and look like they're really involved in scum hunting.

Getting the day one initial bw out of the way early leaves time to focus on other players, I think.

I may be quite wrong, and you are certainly more experienced than I am.

Um, wot.

So you think that we should lynch the player who was under all the attention (for not much of a reason, given you yourself dropped a mayor vote without explanation), rather than players who are not making much sense?

really? what I got from b.tern was that we should get the vote done with and then look for scum. Either way I'm going to have to share the um, wot.

No. That is not what I meant, though I see it can be read that way. See above, I've explained myself as best I can.

[b.ternarius]

I can see a b.tern bw but i've been all over her in the ratskep game so I might have a bit of a bias on her atm.

Tsk!

[Athene]

I'll be going to bed shortly, so.

##vote b.ternarius##

[oblivion]

Imv, Linus made the error of posting a muddled bit of strategy on day one which was odd enough to get attention focussed on him so no one else gets scrutinised closely. Not particularly helpful even if he is town.

GEFGW, or a day one lynch

##vote Linus##

yabbut your vote is on him.