Stargate SG1 - game thread

[Zigmen]

Oblivion claims our reveal of the WB violates the spirit of GM neutrality. Though it is not a violation of any actual rule, I can see her point.

[r.c]

Oblivion claims our reveal of the WB violates the spirit of GM neutrality. Though it is not a violation of any actual rule, I can see her point.

WB?

[Zigmen]

Oblivion claims our reveal of the WB violates the spirit of GM neutrality. Though it is not a violation of any actual rule, I can see her point.

WB?

Yes, RC. Ksen and I are now masons. We may now communicate outside the thread. We got this ability about 30 minutes before daybreak today.

I think we've said this several times.

We are using a WriteBoard.

[divagreen]

r.c, are you still in favour of keeping amok in play?

I wouldn't want to waste a day lynch on amok. We can ask her to withold her NKs if needed.

Agreed.

I am feeling much better about Amok with her actually producing a kill. I understand why she made the choice that she did and it clears up a lot in my mind. I have a soft spot for indies, even SKs who are determined to help town. I played a game where I had to find the SK only I had a posting restriction and could not tell town there was an SK. If I found him, I would convert to a doc, we would become mason/lovers and he would have been the town vig which could have proven the scum who won the game's vig claim to be false. Despite my begging for an entire month, town lynched him.

Amok has played it true so far. She knows how every action she makes will be scrutinised. I would much rather test out Ksen/Zigmen's claim now, than later. Because tbh, if they are town then they are uber retarded for revealing that info at this stage in the game since it would greatly bring scum closer to parity if scum takes out one of them out tonight or tomorrow night and gets a twofer. Ksen has been dropping scumtells like a mo fo in this game which I have largely ignored due to the warm fuzzies I still have from the last game I played where we were on the same scum team.

Amok's actions have been town aligned; she has kept her end of the bargain so I think we should keep ours.

[divagreen]

Oblivion claims our reveal of the WB violates the spirit of GM neutrality. Though it is not a violation of any actual rule, I can see her point.

WB?

Yes, RC. Ksen and I are now masons. We may now communicate outside the thread. We got this ability about 30 minutes before daybreak today.

I think we've said this several times.

We are using a WriteBoard.

No you haven't, you said it in your first post and Ksen agreed with you and that is the extent of it. You just became lovers last night. Remember? There is no "we've said this several times".

[r.c]

Oblivion claims our reveal of the WB violates the spirit of GM neutrality. Though it is not a violation of any actual rule, I can see her point.

WB?

Yes, RC. Ksen and I are now masons. We may now communicate outside the thread. We got this ability about 30 minutes before daybreak today.

I think we've said this several times.

We are using a WriteBoard.

I just wanted to know what WB meant. writeboard didn't strike me at that time.

[Zigmen]

No you haven't, you said it in your first post and Ksen agreed with you and that is the extent of it. You just became lovers last night. Remember? There is no "we've said this several times".

From page 1:

We are currently in communication outside of the thread.

From page 2:

I shared a stone with him, and now we can speak.

And after RC asked:

We may now communicate outside the thread. We got this ability about 30 minutes before daybreak today.

I think we've said this several times.

Ok, maybe should have said "a couple of times."

I didn't realize he was asking what a WB was.

[ksen]

No you haven't, you said it in your first post and Ksen agreed with you and that is the extent of it. You just became lovers last night. Remember? There is no "we've said this several times".

What are you talking about? We never said we were lovers.

:lightbulb: But if we were I'd totally want our lovers name to be the Zigboyz.

[ksen]

eta: @diva . . . and if you did think we were lovers why are you voting to lynch me?

[divagreen]

eta: @diva . . . and if you did think we were lovers why are you voting to lynch me?

You are right, you did not say that you were mason/lovers just masons. Don't you even attempt to stand this on your twinkle toes and try to turn this around on me. A lovers claim at this stage would make town less likely to lynch you, which would be a stellar claim for scum to make. It does make me feel better that you both are not retardo town and just plain ol' scum though, now that you have pointed it out.

[Zigmen]

Here's the Wiki regarding our characters:

2005Edit 2005 sectionEdit

Catherine died in 2005. Many of her possessions were left to Daniel Jackson including her Eye of Ra medallion and her entire collection of artifacts which ultimately led to a Zero Point Module. Her niece said that Daniel was like a son to her. (SG1: "Moebius, Part 1")

[Zigmen]

eta: @diva . . . and if you did think we were lovers why are you voting to lynch me?

You are right, you did not say that you were mason/lovers just masons. Don't you even attempt to stand this on your twinkle toes and try to turn this around on me. A lovers claim at this stage would make town less likely to lynch you, which would be a stellar claim for scum to make. It does make me feel better that you both are not retardo town and just plain ol' scum though, now that you have pointed it out.

Actually, Diva, I think you're pretty much cleared. You could have altered the vote yesterday and made us lynch Amok, which is what Scum would have wanted. Scum doesn't want us having this firepower.

I'm pretty sure we're looking at Athene and Charlou, the 2 players that absolutely refused to consider that Amok should be allowed to prove her alliance with Town.

There were other votes as well, but look at how these two reacted to questions about allowing Amok to live.

[ksen]

amok, if scum manage to get me or zigmen lynched please kill one of either athene or charlou.

Thanks very much!

[divagreen]

Why Higgz, Ksen?

[divagreen]

*Why NOT Higgz