Stargate SG1 - game thread

[r.c]

I'm major paul davis.

[Athene]

Whatever we decide, the best option is to include making a kill choice today that's dependent on the flip of the lynch choice, as well as the lynch choice. Please.

The Mason claim sounds reasonable. I already posted my role from Oblivion on Day 3, and it was the real role that was more elaborate and the safe-claim that was basic.

Edited slightly to not break the rules:

I am Colonel Robert Makepeace and I am on no one's side but my own, and that of whoever will best butter my bread. I am the serial killer. I win by surviving until another faction wins.

If I need a safe name claim I can use General George Hammond

I can't even find a General George Hammond on any of the Stargate sites. I think it's just a made up name.

George Hammond is a Stargate character. The wording looks plausible.

[Athene]

Athene, truly understand doubts about my win condition.

I didn't kill on Night 1 or Night 3 on purpose. I didn't kill on Night 2 because Bilirubin was protected. I mentioned before that a Serial Killer who doesn't kill is a feeble threat. Last-standing would require me to kill as much as possible, no?

It's irrelvant and she knows it.

If we kill 2 more Scum and the game is still going, you get lynched. That was the deal.

If we can't kill 2 more Scum, we lose fucking anyway.

I don't know why she's playing daft as a log.

It's daft to pish posh the wording of our win condition and pretend it has no significance.

[Athene]

I think we should mass character claim.

Objections?

none

And your claim is?

Bra'tac.

[Athene]

Whatever we decide, the best option is to include making a kill choice today that's dependent on the flip of the lynch choice, as well as the lynch choice. Please.

The Mason claim sounds reasonable. I already posted my role from Oblivion on Day 3, and it was the real role that was more elaborate and the safe-claim that was basic.

Edited slightly to not break the rules:

I am Colonel Robert Makepeace and I am on no one's side but my own, and that of whoever will best butter my bread. I am the serial killer. I win by surviving until another faction wins.

If I need a safe name claim I can use General George Hammond

I can't even find a General George Hammond on any of the Stargate sites. I think it's just a made up name.

George Hammond is a Stargate character. The wording looks plausible.

Eta, the wording of your not-quote

[amok]

Athene, truly understand doubts about my win condition.

I didn't kill on Night 1 or Night 3 on purpose. I didn't kill on Night 2 because Bilirubin was protected. I mentioned before that a Serial Killer who doesn't kill is a feeble threat. Last-standing would require me to kill as much as possible, no?

It's irrelvant and she knows it.

If we kill 2 more Scum and the game is still going, you get lynched. That was the deal.

If we can't kill 2 more Scum, we lose fucking anyway.

I don't know why she's playing daft as a log.

It's daft to pish posh the wording of our win condition and pretend it has no significance.

It's not the wording of my win condition I'm talking about. It's my actions on Night 1, Night 2 and Night 3 I'm talking about.

[r.c]

I'm inclined to believe zigmen's claim. There is nothing in the wiki mafia that says that masons have to be lovers. If they are infact mason lovers, it would have been a pretty dumb move to out, effectively giving two kills to scum with one shot.

If ksen and zigmen are indeed scum, we can lynch one of them tomorrow and still win. I would suggest that we go after someone else today.
To me it is between athene and higgs.
##vote athene##

[charlou]

Oblivion said in a recent game when talk of scum safe-claims came up that she likes to reserve a big name or two for scum to use safely.

Oblivion said in a recent game when talk of scum safe-claims came up that she likes to reserve a big name or two for scum to use safely.

Yeah, but both as big as ours?

Oh, I'm happy where my lynch vote is.

Athene, truly understand doubts about my win condition.

I didn't kill on Night 1 or Night 3 on purpose. I didn't kill on Night 2 because Bilirubin was protected. I mentioned before that a Serial Killer who doesn't kill is a feeble threat. Last-standing would require me to kill as much as possible, no?

It's irrelvant and she knows it.

If we kill 2 more Scum and the game is still going, you get lynched. That was the deal.

If we can't kill 2 more Scum, we lose fucking anyway.

I don't know why she's playing daft as a log.

It's daft to pish posh the wording of our win condition and pretend it has no significance.

Athene, if the other threat we need to eliminate is not the SK, what do you think of the possibility that there's another faction apart from scum in this game?

r.c, diva, higgs, your thoughts too please ... and amok.

Zigmen and ksen have been playing as a pair since before outing as masons. Zigmen went gunning for bili with a heap of emotive nonsense about how 'abysmally' bili was playing ... I reread day four and it was Zigmen's posts that looked like everything he's making bili's out to be, while bili was the one who was making sense. amok agreed with Zigmen and now bili's gone.

Regardless whether amok's sole survivor or wins with whoever wins, Athene's right about the numbers. Zigmen, your complete lack of concern about the loss of two town due to amok not being lynched yesterday, and your comment today that Feck's NK of praying is good .. none of that is pro-town talk.

Zigmen, I asked you direct questions yesterday, all of which you ignored. You tried to have me NK'd by the SK without giving any reasoning. Today you're trying to build a vague case against me, based on nothing .... you're waffling around it because you don't feel so confident of getting support.

The reason I was in favour of a green vote on you is because I think you set up your story from your first post in this thread to provide an out for one of you regardless how the other flips:

Ksen and I became masons last night. We received the same notification PM. We do not know each other's alignment for certain, but the mechanism for our link seems quite pro-town. We are currently in communication outside of the thread.

[amok]

I'm inclined to believe zigmen's claim. There is nothing in the wiki mafia that says that masons have to be lovers. If they are infact mason lovers, it would have been a pretty dumb move to out, effectively giving two kills to scum with one shot.

If ksen and zigmen are indeed scum, we can lynch one of them tomorrow and still win. I would suggest that we go after someone else today.
To me it is between athene and higgs.
##vote athene##

If this vote goes through, and athene flips Scum, who do you think I should kill? If she flips Town, who do you think I should kill? Thanks. This isn't in stone, but I can make my own tally, and update it as we go along if people change their minds.

[charlou]

You need to read this:

1) We've asked Oblivion for permission to reveal our WB. No answer yet.
2) I am Catherine Langford, the daughter of the archaeologist who discovered the Stargate, and I have 2 relics from that dig which are communicator stones (blue ovals).
3) Ksen (Dr. Daniel Jackson) was searching players (he is an archeologist) until he found me. I shared a stone with him, and now we can speak.

We got this ability about 30 minutes before daybreak.

You say you have two communicator stones ... why two?

re the bit I've bolded ... You posted your first post today 6 minutes after oblivion's daybreak OP.

[amok]

Charlou, if we lynch Zigmen or Ksen, and the lynchee flips Town, who would you chose for a night kill?

[higgs2]

okay mafia wiki on sk's: A Serial Killer is individually aligned and their goal is to be the last remaining player in the game. They can perform one – usually mandatory – kill per night by sending the name of the player they wish to kill to the moderator.

on the other hand oblivion is big into indies working with town so I can see her givign a town compatible wc.

who was saying something about masons being lovers? that is highly unlikely though not unheard of. actually, they wouldn't be called masons they'd be sibling with communication abilities. so I'm guessing zig's claim is true. I haven't had a reason to doubt ksen this game.

charlou what do you think of athene?

[charlou]

Charlou, if we lynch Zigmen or Ksen, and the lynchee flips Town, who would you chose for a night kill?

I am leaning towards Zigmen for the nightkill ... that is based on my thinking that if they're not scum, he and/or ksen are possibly a separate 'threat to town' we have to eliminate. I've asked for your (collective 'your') thoughts on that in my post on the previous page.

[charlou]

okay mafia wiki on sk's: A Serial Killer is individually aligned and their goal is to be the last remaining player in the game. They can perform one – usually mandatory – kill per night by sending the name of the player they wish to kill to the moderator.

on the other hand oblivion is big into indies working with town so I can see her givign a town compatible wc.

who was saying something about masons being lovers? that is highly unlikely though not unheard of. actually, they wouldn't be called masons they'd be sibling with communication abilities. so I'm guessing zig's claim is true. I haven't had a reason to doubt ksen this game.

charlou what do you think of athene?

I've not found anything among her posts to indicate that she's anything but pro-town, so leaning neautral town with athene.

Leaning neutral town with r.c.

Leaning neautral scum with you

Leaning town with diva.

I don't trust the Zigmen and ksen alignment. I really want all your opinions on that.

[Athene]

Athene, if the other threat we need to eliminate is not the SK, what do you think of the possibility that there's another faction apart from scum in this game?

There is no night kill to account for a second scum faction. I did wonder about a cult leader - but this game seems a little small for that.