http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtop ... 1&t=110313
Looks like a radical change, and not being well received. More discussion here:
http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtop ... 9&t=110317
hackenslash wrote:http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=110313
Looks like a radical change, and not being well received. More discussion here:
http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtop ... 9&t=110317
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.

Dear forum members,
We wanted you all to know at the earliest opportunity about our new website currently in development. RichardDawkins.net will have a new look and feel, improved security, and much more. Visits to the site have really grown over the past 3 1/2 years, and this update gives us an opportunity to address several issues. Over the years we've become one of the world's leading resources for breaking rational and scientific news from all over the net and creating original content. We are focusing on quality content distribution, and will be bringing more original articles, video and other content as we grow.
The new RichardDawkins.net will have a fully-integrated discussion section. This will be a new feature for the site, similar to the current forum, but not identical. We feel the new system will be much cleaner and easier to use, and hopefully this will encourage participation from a wider variety of users.
We will leave the current forum up for 30 days, giving regular users an opportunity to locally archive any content they value. When the new website goes live, you are welcome to submit these posts as new discussions. The forum will then be taken down from the web. You will not loose your username on the new system.
The new discussion area will not be a new forum. It will be different. We will be using a system of tags to categorize items, instead of sub-forums. Discussions can have multiple tags, such as "Education", "Children", and "Critical Thinking". Starting a new discussion will require approval, so we ask that you only submit new discussions that are truly relevant to reason and science. Subsequent responses on the thread will not need approval—however anything off topic or violating the new terms of service will be removed. The approval process will be there to ensure the quality of posts on the site. This is purely an editorial exercise to help new visitors find quality content quickly. We hope this discussion area will reflect the foundation's goals and values.
We know that this is a big decision. We know some of you will be against this change. We ask that you respect our decision and help make this transition as smooth as possible.
We're confident that these changes will improve the site experience and we look forward to seeing what you do with the new system.
Many thanks again.
Josh Timonen,
Andrew Chalkley
The Richard Dawkins Foundation
DP wrote:Threads merged, might I just say that it's sad to see an end coming to the forum that brought most of us together.




pawiz wrote:DP wrote:Threads merged, might I just say that it's sad to see an end coming to the forum that brought most of us together.
I can't see how it can survive this one
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.


Bella Fortuna wrote:Argh - sorry, I started another thread on this.
Bella Fortuna wrote:Argh - sorry, I started another thread on this.


JimC wrote:The real night of the long knives is coming to RDF, as the authoritarian model Josh T has always wanted comes to fruition...
We may have a rush of refugees...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest