Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

[DaveDodo007]

She's very dismissive of men's thoughts about male circumcision, there. As was the interviewer. In fact, the interviewer's bias in support of RW's hobby horse is obvious.

She's very dismissive of men in general. And, she gets outraged if a man tries to "tell a woman how to feel," but she constantly tells men how they should feel about things. Men's concerns are whines. Women's concerns, no matter what, are always serious.

I'm sorry but why does anybody care what this individual says, I don't know what the prerequisite for getting a communication degree is, though if we follow her example it sure doesn't include critical thinking, logic and reason. She will only matter while we give her the oxygen of publicity and even then it is just on the intertubes. Ignore her and she will fade into obscurity but knowing the interwebs then the lulz factor will play to big a roll and we will have to put up with her stupidity for a whole lot longer.

For the same reason folks care what Creationists say. They have influence and won't stop trying to shove their idiocy down everyone's throat they possibly can.

I like to go to the occasional conference and convention, and I'd appreciate it if she wasn't invited to speak. That's one of the reasons I care.

That's a good point though she does seem to be thriving on the publicity I just thought maybe try a different tack.

[Coito ergo sum]

I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.

[Thinking Aloud]

I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.

In which case, some letters to the appropriate organisers, complaining that speaker X's talk was a) not what was advertised; b) seemed to be an entirely personal series of anecdotes; c) contained nothing of substance or relevance to the event; d) whatever, might be a start.

[Coito ergo sum]

I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.

In which case, some letters to the appropriate organisers, complaining that speaker X's talk was a) not what was advertised; b) seemed to be an entirely personal series of anecdotes; c) contained nothing of substance or relevance to the event; d) whatever, might be a start.

Excellent suggestions.

[Jason]

I suggest you include an 8'x10' of your penis and a swingers card as well.

[Coito ergo sum]

I suggest you include an 8'x10' of your penis and a swingers card as well.

An 8 x 10? Giving me a lot of credit there... I think I can make do with a 5 x 7.

[DaveDodo007]

This is why I say you should ignore the trolls at ffb, skeptichicks and A+. Watson tweets.


‘If you have sex with someone that is drunk, they are unable to consent and that is rape.’

When naïve people respond, she pulls a bait and switch.

‘O you know just a bunch of people SO MAD because they are not allowed to have sex with someone who is blotto.’

Drunk/blotto, basically give a vague talk/post/tweet wait for the mugs to walk right into the trap and profit. You can’t argue with these fuckwits as they aren’t interested in honest debate, they are just trying to remain in the public (internet) eye.

Don’t believe me well in another tweet Watson make no attempt to hide it.

‘Now that adsense canned RSS ads, I’m searching for alternatives. I’ve fallen into a black hole of get-rich-quick losers.’

I’m not going to link to any of these tweets because I’m not giving them any clicks as it just what they want.

If people want to comment on the goings on at ffb, skeptchicks and A+. Make sure you do it at another venue so as to not give them what they want, drama and clicks (profit.)

Whether having sex with people who have consumed alcohol is consensual is another matter and worthy of debate just not with them hucksters.

[Jason]

You can’t argue with these fuckwits as they aren’t interested in honest debate, they are just trying to remain in the public (internet) eye.

See my posts re the search volume of these fuckwits vs donkey porn.

[Coito ergo sum]

What would the Skepchicks think?

[Cormac]

What would the Skepchicks think?

I wonder what happened when the cop took him away to the side...

[Coito ergo sum]

Probably nothing other than the cop lecturing him.

[Audley Strange]

There's one for everything...