Announcement about RDF Part 2.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Conny
No longer in the dark
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:54 pm
About me: lactose intolerant
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Conny » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:16 pm

Image
The wonderful thing about libraries and bookstores- even the television or the radio- is that no one is forcing you to read anything, or to go to any particular movie, or to watch something on television or to listen to something on the radio. You have free choice. -Judith Krug

User avatar
Wondering Fart
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Wondering Fart » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:17 pm

Mazille wrote:JW! Good to see you, dear! :smooch:
:huggeroo:

zoon
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by zoon » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:17 pm

I’m with the ones who think God did it. Being imaginary never stopped him having heretics burnt alive.

The weird part is removing all the previous posts. The rest might be explained as technical problems, personality clashes etc, but I don’t see what Josh Timonen or the Richard Dawkins Foundation gain from deleting previous posts, given that it would be fairly simple and cheap just to leave them in a read-only state. The people who clearly benefit from the removal of a Wikipedia-sized archive of powerful anti-theist argumentation are the God squad.

A conspiracy theory makes me feel a bit better.

User avatar
ozewiezeloose
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:19 pm

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by ozewiezeloose » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:18 pm

Tytalus's comment from the Homeopathy thread:
Tytalus wrote:It is interesting, how comparable the placebo effect in homeopathy is to the supposed 'power' of prayer. Just like prayer, homeopaths give people the sense of doing something about their ails, even if it's pointless, even if the homeopaths benefit financially from lying to such people.

I guess it might be something like building a huge fan base with a web site and then lying to your fans about its future. Or are the lost fans foolish for saying anything about it, just getting the sense of doing something -- however futile? Time will tell, I suppose.
:funny:

User avatar
Heresiarch
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:39 pm
About me: Formerly known as Heresiarch.
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Heresiarch » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:19 pm

Tortured_Genius wrote:From his pronouncments like “Using a forum as a substitute for a real website is sloppy and lazy.” JT has absolutely no business working in the web design industry since he has no clue about his target audience. I write that as an IT professional with 30 years experience who has to deal with tossers like this every day. They think they know it all. They don't and when they screw up everyone else pays. (On the plus side I've made quite a good living clearing up after assorted wunderkind).
You needed to read his thoughts to work out that he knows nothing about usability or interface design? You should have been able to work that out just by visiting the RD.net home page. Two sidebars overloaded with information and images. A third (almost) side bar on the right side with a tabbed interface to switch between two somehow different types of news. Only ever a single article on the rest of the page, squashed into the little space available so that most of it ends up with four words to a column. All that's really missing from it is a really busy background to make it impossible to read the text, under construction signs and flashing text.

I've no idea on his level of competence as a coder or as an admin, but he knows fuck all about design.
The Hell Law says that Hell is reserved exclusively for them that
believe in it. Further, the lowest Rung in Hell is reserved for them that
believe in it on the supposition that they'll go there if they don't.
-- Honest Book of Truth; The Gospel According to Fred, 3:1

User avatar
HughMcB
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada. . . . . . . . . . . . . (natural habitat: Ireland)

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by HughMcB » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:22 pm

klr wrote:One more flagging of that post, and we'll see if the FP co-ordinator himself is immune to having a comment binned or not.

Consider this as a form of research. :coffee:

And please don't ask how I know this ... :shifty:

EDIT: It's now been flagged 6 times, and is still in place. 5 should get the comment sent to the alternate thread. I guess my hypothesis has been upheld. :roll:
The plot moistens.... :ddpan:
Timonenfail wrote:We are all very excited about the new changes.
Quote-mine Dawkins wrote:If I ever had any doubts that RD.net needs to change, and rid itself of this particular aspect of Internet culture, they are dispelled by this episode.

User avatar
tytalus
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:08 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by tytalus » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:24 pm

I tried to strike a balance between 'subtle' and 'zinger'. And self-deprecating, had to toss that in.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by klr » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:25 pm

HughMcB wrote:
klr wrote:One more flagging of that post, and we'll see if the FP co-ordinator himself is immune to having a comment binned or not.

Consider this as a form of research. :coffee:

And please don't ask how I know this ... :shifty:

EDIT: It's now been flagged 6 times, and is still in place. 5 should get the comment sent to the alternate thread. I guess my hypothesis has been upheld. :roll:
The plot moistens.... :ddpan:
My hypothesis being that /Mike is immune to the cumulative effects of flagging. The programmer in me wonders if would have been easier to stop people from flagging his comments in the first place. :ugeek:

Another part of me is much more Machiavellian. :demon:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
ozewiezeloose
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:19 pm

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by ozewiezeloose » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:29 pm

More posts, guys! Flood 'em! :mrgreen:

User avatar
Tortured_Genius
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:55 am
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Tortured_Genius » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:31 pm

Heresiarch wrote:
Tortured_Genius wrote:From his pronouncments like “Using a forum as a substitute for a real website is sloppy and lazy.” JT has absolutely no business working in the web design industry since he has no clue about his target audience. I write that as an IT professional with 30 years experience who has to deal with tossers like this every day. They think they know it all. They don't and when they screw up everyone else pays. (On the plus side I've made quite a good living clearing up after assorted wunderkind).
You needed to read his thoughts to work out that he knows nothing about usability or interface design? You should have been able to work that out just by visiting the RD.net home page. Two sidebars overloaded with information and images. A third (almost) side bar on the right side with a tabbed interface to switch between two somehow different types of news. Only ever a single article on the rest of the page, squashed into the little space available so that most of it ends up with four words to a column. All that's really missing from it is a really busy background to make it impossible to read the text, under construction signs and flashing text.

I've no idea on his level of competence as a coder or as an admin, but he knows fuck all about design.
Oh, I never bothered to look at his crapola website and TBH had never heard of him until today. That comment was picked up from Peter Harrison's blog, then I looked at the RDF page, then posted a comment about hijacking, which I'll stand by - his page counter is probably huge and the tit didn't realise it was due to people "passing through" rather than looking at his eye-bending graphics.

I'm not a designer - but that website......hurts.

User avatar
Matt H
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Matt H » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:31 pm

More reasoned posts, please. I'm still holding out a glimmer of hope that Richard didn't fully sign up to what Josh was doing. After all, Richard used the forum himself a fair amount, so he can't have been blind to it. If we have enough people offering polite resistance maybe something might happen.

Richard reads the front page. Maybe if he sees our posts and decides to check out the blogs of Peter Harrison, DarkChilde et al, he might just pick up that phone and tell Josh to put things the way they were.

User avatar
Valden
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:12 pm
About me: Once upon a time...
Location: Peyton, Colorado, U.S
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Valden » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:32 pm

Matt H wrote:Josh really is a wannabe Stalin. He's pissing all over history. First he deleted user accounts and posts, now he's saying the people who left left because they wanted a social network. FUCK THAT. That cunt never understood the forum, I bet he didn't once look at any of the science threads.
Hey, I just woke up. Do you have the link to him saying that? :biggrin:

User avatar
Wondering Fart
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by Wondering Fart » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:34 pm

Matt H wrote:More reasoned posts, please. I'm still holding out a glimmer of hope that Richard didn't fully sign up to what Josh was doing. After all, Richard used the forum himself a fair amount, so he can't have been blind to it. If we have enough people offering polite resistance maybe something might happen.

Richard reads the front page. Maybe if he sees our posts and decides to check out the blogs of Peter Harrison, DarkChilde et al, he might just pick up that phone and tell Josh to put things the way they were.
My hope is with you on that. I just don't picture Richard being as laissez-faire and uncaring as Timonen.

User avatar
ashley
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by ashley » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:35 pm

Here I am guys, did you miss me?
Ah, you didn't miss me at all did you? Knew I should have posted more often.


Since people have already been speculating, does anyone else reckon the whole "no leading them to other fora" might be because RD still has a bad taste in his mouth from when TAF started up and he called it childish or something and we made him apologise for being rude? Maybe he told Josh he didn't want a rerun of that.

User avatar
natselrox
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:32 am
Contact:

Re: Announcement about RDF Part 2.

Post by natselrox » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:35 pm

Valden wrote:
Matt H wrote:Josh really is a wannabe Stalin. He's pissing all over history. First he deleted user accounts and posts, now he's saying the people who left left because they wanted a social network. FUCK THAT. That cunt never understood the forum, I bet he didn't once look at any of the science threads.
Hey, I just woke up. Do you have the link to him saying that? :biggrin:
http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtop ... 0&t=110313

Happy Birthday! :td:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests