The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Robert_S » Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:39 am

hadespussercats wrote: I don't think hadespussercats enables rape, by the way. And all this third-person self-referencing is making me feel like da Schneib.

A+ vs Schneibster! :{D

:pop:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:50 am

Robert_S wrote:
hadespussercats wrote: I don't think hadespussercats enables rape, by the way. And all this third-person self-referencing is making me feel like da Schneib.

A+ vs Schneibster! :{D

:pop:
I bet they all like otters, though.

Doesn't everyone like otters? Maybe we can heal the rift by bonding over our furry friends in the sea?
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by orpheus » Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:51 am

Something else just occurred to me. They want to be inclusive. But by insisting on real names or consistent pseudonyms, they're going to make it a very unsafe place for atheists who choose to remain closeted for good reasons of self-protection. One of the best and most important things the RDF did was to provide a safe place for such people from all over the world. They could talk with fellow atheists while remaining safely anonymous. It changed more than a few people's lives for the better.

I don't think they realize it, but in this area our new friends are shooting themselves in the collective foot.
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by JimC » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:12 am

Are we a hate site?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:17 am

JimC wrote:Are we a hate site?
Yes. I mean, that's our reputation.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by JimC » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:19 am

hadespussercats wrote:
JimC wrote:Are we a hate site?
Yes. I mean, that's our reputation.
Whereas, in reality, we iz all cuddly fluffy bunnies! :cheer:

If only they knew... :sigh:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:21 am

JimC wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
JimC wrote:Are we a hate site?
Yes. I mean, that's our reputation.
Whereas, in reality, we iz all cuddly fluffy bunnies! :cheer:

If only they knew... :sigh:
We're pink bunnies, Jim. Pink.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
SteveB
Nibbler
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
About me: The more you change the less you feel
Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by SteveB » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:51 am

Don't worry, we have till the end of the year before we have to dispense all our amassed hate. Don't everyone save it for the last day though.
Twit, twat, twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged! :(

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 18928
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Sean Hayden » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:53 am

That's probably cutting it a little close then.

Haters.
The latest fad is a poverty social. Every woman must wear calico,
and every man his old clothes. In addition each is fined 25 cents if
he or she does not have a patch on his or her clothing. If these
parties become a regular thing, says an exchange, won't there be
a good chance for newspaper men to shine?

The Silver State. 1894.

User avatar
Badger3k
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:42 pm
About me: Just talkin' claptrap. Lilith Rules!
Location: Texas
Contact:

The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Badger3k » Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:20 am

hadespussercats wrote:
Ayaan wrote:Really?
AtheismPlus user Simon wrote:My understanding is that one of the reasons for Atheism+ is to create a safe space and to not associate with haters. However, I am reading the current forum rules and do not see any provision on whether documented bad behavior on other sites is a factor regarding participation on this forum. Greta Christina has the following provision in her comment policy and I believe you would do well to adopt something similar:
9: Do not behave atrociously in other blogs. If you are barely walking the line of acceptable behavior in this blog — but you have a pattern of foul, demeaning, sexist/ racist/ etc., insulting, violently threatening, or otherwise reprehensible behavior in other blogs — you will be banned from this one, with no second chance, and no warning.
Given that we already have a slyme pit regular participating in this thread I think this is a good time to ask the question. IMO if someone is a regular participant on a hate site then you should consider very carefully if they are welcome to participate here.
Yeah, I was referencing this earlier when I wrote that i doubted they'd welcome me, despite our sharing many ideals.

Apparently, "The Slyme Pit" is an actual forum, though.
Yeah - I'm in it and a bunch from here and there interact regularly. I just wanted to take a bit to pimp it out since there is quite a bit on someone seriously harassing Justin Vacula - posting addresses, parents addresses, contacting them, contacting schools, etc - apparently it's enough that he's going to go to the cops. So, that is considered acceptable? It's after the 10,000th post on the periodic thread, but I can't put the URL in until I can figure out how to use this tapatalk app. Sorry, I'm sure someone else can if it hasn't been mentioned elsewhere in this thread or forum.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by JimC » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:24 am

hadespussercats wrote:

We're pink bunnies, Jim. Pink
But fluffy as well, right? We gotta be fluffy, or we'll look like those fucking naked mole rats... :?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Pappa » Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:23 am

So.... if I signed up to have a look round, would my personal info be immediately revealed because I am a misogynist, rape-enabler and hater?
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by JimC » Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:52 am

Pappa wrote:So.... if I signed up to have a look round, would my personal info be immediately revealed because I am a misogynist, rape-enabler and hater?
The username Pappa would set alarm bells ringing over the known universe...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
cowiz
Shirley
Posts: 16482
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
About me: Head up a camels arse
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by cowiz » Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:55 pm

Pappa wrote:So.... if I signed up to have a look round, would my personal info be immediately revealed because I am a misogynist, rape-enabler and hater?
Only because you're a bacon loving rapist
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Audley Strange » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:06 pm

I've had a look round Pappa. Essentially it's

"Let's do this"

"But wait!"

"Ah good point. Let's discuss minefcraft instead. That'll change the world.

Yes! Hooray for us. Aren't we wonderful?"
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest