Those who have come from Pz's blog, aka THAT thread

[Coito ergo sum]

...now come on, baby... succumb my patriarchy.

Is it bad that I think that sounds hot?

Are you saying you LIKE a big, hard patriarchy?

....whatever will the Skepchicks think....

[Kristie]

...now come on, baby... succumb my patriarchy.

Is it bad that I think that sounds hot?

Are you saying you LIKE a big, hard patriarchy?

....whatever will the Skepchicks think....

They like them, too. I'm just not ashamed to admit it.

[Coito ergo sum]

...now come on, baby... succumb my patriarchy.

Is it bad that I think that sounds hot?

Are you saying you LIKE a big, hard patriarchy?

....whatever will the Skepchicks think....

They like them, too. I'm just not ashamed to admit it.

Apparently, there is a huge debate in the feminist camp over the facial, too. http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Are they demeaning?

Anti-pornography activists like Gail Dines and Robert Jensen agree with at least Savage's first three words; in recent works, both have cited the growing popularity of the "facial" as proof of the misogyny of mainstream pornography.

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Wait for it... I will bet dollars to donuts that we'll get a Skepchick expose on what constitutes proper sex, and what is demeaning and sexist sex....

[colubridae]

...now come on, baby... succumb my patriarchy.

Is it bad that I think that sounds hot?

Are you saying you LIKE a big, hard patriarchy?

....whatever will the Skepchicks think....

They like them, too. I'm just not ashamed to admit it.

Apparently, there is a huge debate in the feminist camp over the facial, too. http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Are they demeaning?

Anti-pornography activists like Gail Dines and Robert Jensen agree with at least Savage's first three words; in recent works, both have cited the growing popularity of the "facial" as proof of the misogyny of mainstream pornography.

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Wait for it... I will bet dollars to donuts that we'll get a Skepchick expose on what constitutes proper sex, and what is demeaning and sexist sex....

love that film (the welshman got an oscar - lucky he stayed sober)

[Wumbologist]

Apparently, there is a huge debate in the feminist camp over the facial, too. http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Are they demeaning?

I don't know about demeaning, but it's certainly wasteful! That's the least opportune time to take yer dick outta wherever it's been!

[colubridae]

Apparently, there is a huge debate in the feminist camp over the facial, too. http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/cultist/ ... inists.php

Are they demeaning?

I don't know about demeaning, but it's certainly wasteful! That's the least opportune time to take yer dick outta wherever it's been!

They're all good catholics.

[Coito ergo sum]

One of the skepchicks once recommended that men cut holes in watermelons and fuck them:

No word on whether the watermelon's consent was needed.

[Wumbologist]

One of the skepchicks once recommended that men cut holes in watermelons and fuck them:

No word on whether the watermelon's consent was needed.

Between the watermelon and the sex-negative feminist, the watermelon is probably the better conversationalist too.

[Coito ergo sum]

I remember that the Skepchick who made the watermelon recommendation said that she had heard that men do that....

Still to this day, I have never thought about doing it, or heard of anyone doing it. Yet, the skepchick in her life apparently heard so much about it that it was one of the first things to occur to her to recommend for men who have trouble getting laid. Watermelon fucking is apparently something Skepchicks think men do.

[mozg]

I can handle those rules, but I have no need of pink or purple shirts, nor do I need any 40 S&W. Though I am running short on .357 and I could use a new pair of jeans...

Sounds like a fair trade off.

Between the watermelon and the sex-negative feminist, the watermelon is probably the better conversationalist too.

Sex-negative?

Sounds downright terrifying.

I remember that the Skepchick who made the watermelon recommendation said that she had heard that men do that...

Wait, it's not a put on? It was a real person who really suggested that?

[Coito ergo sum]

Wait, it's not a put on? It was a real person who really suggested that?

Absolutely. She said it on a youtube video, shortly after the Elevatorgate fiasco happened last year.

[Seth]

....women who "like" the cawk don't really "like" it, they are "succumbing" to the patriarchy...

Which is weird, because my girlfriend is pissed at me because I don't come in her mouth when she (at her own instigation) gives me a blow job.

I have a little trouble with it because all I can think of are the teeth...There was this bad WWII movie I saw one time that had a woman being forced to suck Nazi cock biting it off...I've been a little off-put with blow jobs ever since.

Somebody ought to tell the Skepchicks that if they don't like swallowing cum, they probably shouldn't suck cock.

[Thumpalumpacus]

We’re in the midst of a little civil war, a war with the smug. For so long, it was an accomplishment to be an atheist — we had rejected the dogma of the majority. It’s really something important. And now we’re growing, and we gather in greater and greater numbers, and while it’s great to find ourselves in large groups of people where we don’t have to be defensive about our disbelief, it also becomes obvious that it is not enough.

Jesus on a stick, ratchet down your ego, Padre. You want a glassful of "smug"? It's in your bathroom, above the sink.

The flag I defend is not Atheism®. The flag I defend is Individualism.

As far as the Skepchicks go, send 'em my way. I'll teach them the 9000 names of God.

[mozg]

As far as the Skepchicks go, send 'em my way. I'll teach them the 9000 names of God.

For something like that, I could pretend to be a skepchick for a while...

[Thumpalumpacus]

You would need one hell of a good shave.