Sex on the new forum

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Hermit » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:48 am

Seraph wrote:
JimC wrote:
Seraph wrote:
sifaka wrote:Getting back on topic :D

There's a thread on RS called "Why are breasts bad?", they already got a "Mode note" :hehe:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/socio ... t1919.html
RichardPrins wrote:*** MOD NOTE ***
Some post were binned because they were in breach of the user agreement or off-topic.

Please stay on topic (see the OP), and keep in mind what the User Agreement says about Sex and Nudity.
As I said earlier elsewhere, the only difference between the RDF and the RSF is that at the RDF Mark II there is no knighthood at stake. :levi:
Shit, I didn't realise the Prinsmeister was on staff there! :?

Great source of science info, the old RPrins, but a prude to the core... :nono:
As an experiment I have reported this post on the grounds that in line with that forum's rules ("No discussions of personal sexual issues, desires, or problems" are allowed). The 'offending' part of it is the bit I bolded and underlined. In case it does get deleted I quoted it below:
rEvolutionist wrote:Sorry, haven't read the whole thread, so I don't know what consensus has been reached. I have often wondered the same thing, and have recently come to the conclusion that I have a fetish for boobs. I just love the things. Going by how much is on show these days, I figure that most people mustn't share this fetish. What is the consensus so far? Are guys turned on by boobs or not?
Copy of report:
"I have a fetish for boobs. I just love the things"

This post needs binning on the grounds of it contravening the FUA, namely, it contains an expression of a personal sexual desire.
It's been binned. :funny:

Oh well, I suppose that indicates a consistent approach to stamping out discussions of a sexual nature from a personal point of view.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by charlou » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:42 am

starr wrote:4. If you have issues about RatSkep then raise them with the staff at RatSkep. All of this bitching and moaning about RatSkep here at Rationalia is quite frankly pissing me off.
Well, this just brings us straight back to staff stepping in and stating "question answered, thread locked", doesn't it?

And "bitching and moaning"? (where's the bucket and mop to clean up that dripping condescension) I can see what your attitude is to people who hold a different view to yours. :nono:
no fences

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:46 am

Charlou wrote:
starr wrote:4. If you have issues about RatSkep then raise them with the staff at RatSkep. All of this bitching and moaning about RatSkep here at Rationalia is quite frankly pissing me off.
Well, this just brings us straight back to staff stepping in and stating "question answered, thread locked", doesn't it?

And "bitching and moaning"? (where's the mop to clean up that dripping condescension) I can see what your attitude is to people who hold a different view to yours. :nono:
:slapfiht:

:pop:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74095
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by JimC » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:55 am

Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:01 am

JimC wrote:Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:

:coffeespray: :hilarious: :hilarious:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:03 am

JimC wrote:Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:
Even better!

:FMF1:

:pop:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:05 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
JimC wrote:Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:
Even better!

:FMF1:

:pop:
Can I just ask WTF the female in the back is doing? Has she got a strap on or something? :think: :hehe:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:08 am

I seem to recall dev saying once that it turned him on when Charlou and I were fighting... maybe that was his purpose for this thread all along.... :what:




:hehe:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Bella Fortuna » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:18 am

starr wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
JimC wrote:Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:
Even better!

:FMF1:

:pop:
Can I just ask WTF the female in the back is doing? Has she got a strap on or something? :think: :hehe:
I can help with that.... :FIO:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:20 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:
starr wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
JimC wrote:Charlou and Starr, go to my room IMMEDIATELY!

:nono:

:sofa:
Even better!

:FMF1:

:pop:
Can I just ask WTF the female in the back is doing? Has she got a strap on or something? :think: :hehe:
I can help with that.... :FIO:

:coffeespray:



Just wait until Charlou and I have finished fighting though...
Image





@ Charlou :hugs: :flowers:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

User avatar
Rob
Carpe Diem
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Rob » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:21 am

If you have issues about RatSkep then raise them with the staff at RatSkep. All of this bitching and moaning about RatSkep here at Rationalia is quite frankly pissing me off.
Well just offering my unwanted opinion about this. The people in this thread have been talking about not liking a certain policy. To be honest, Starr, you seem to be the most hot-headed one about this here. It doesn't make sense to get uptight about it, despite the fact that you are helping the derails. In fact if you just left this thread alone you wouldn't be getting riled up. I guess I'm just saying don't get angry about people criticizing a policy. They did try to voice their concerns on RS but the way the threads were locked left a bitter taste in their mouth. :dono:

Summary: Just be cool. 8-)

I'm not real good at this whole "derailing" thing but let me try:

Image
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:29 am

ScienceRob wrote:To be honest, Starr, you seem to be the most hot-headed one about this here.
Really? :think:

Hot-headed as in losing my temper and saying unreasonable things or hot-headed as in passionate about the discussion? :ask:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Hermit » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:32 am

starr wrote:
ScienceRob wrote:To be honest, Starr, you seem to be the most hot-headed one about this here.
Really? :think:

Hot-headed as in losing my temper and saying unreasonable things or hot-headed as in passionate about the discussion? :ask:
Hint:
starr wrote:All of this bitching and moaning about RatSkep here at Rationalia is quite frankly pissing me off.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Rob
Carpe Diem
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Rob » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:38 am

Its not really a dichotomy. You make good points but at the same time you are telling people not to talk about it here where they feel comfortable talking about it. Just so I'm not being misunderstood I know you haven't directly said not to talk about it but the context of your statements and the assisting of the derails indicates you would rather not have this discussion here go on. To me that is irrational. (Seraph pointed out another incident)

I like both forums(Rationalia a bit more to be honest). It seems a bit prudish to me, the stance against sex, but meh. Beyond closing Dev's thread regarding the rules in tech I don't care enough to take up the good fight. I think RS is missing out on potential community building and good discussion all around but thats ratske's choice. :dono:
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by virphen » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:42 am

ScienceRob wrote: I think RS is missing out on potential community building and good discussion all around but thats ratske's choice. :dono:

People do have to bear in mind that ratskep is just a baby... and there are other priorities right now besides arguing about all the rules. It does make eminently good sense to make the RDF rules a starting point.

The ex-RDF staff do have a good record when it comes to opening discussions on how the rules on things like trolling and personal attacks should be worded and handled. It wouldn't surprise me if in the future discussions were started on things like the "no personal sex stories" thing by the staff and changes were made. But as I said before, it's not priority #1.

And rationalia is here for all your felching needs.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests