Chauncey Gardner wrote:Peter Harrison wrote:You're right that I don't know what they are thinking. That's how I don't know whether Richard is aware of the lies etc. But we don't need to be supernatural to know that we are being accused of things that didn't happen. I can't say what Richard thinks as a fact. But it is a fact that they have lied about reason for closing the forum, they have lied for months to the mods and they have even lied to Richard himself.
has it occurred to you that there might have been a very valid reason that josh and the RDF team had to suddenly back-track on the promise to keep the forum alive for 30 days and pull the plug?
Or are you so entrenched in your opinion that the RDF site administrator who has run and helped build one of the biggest atheist sites on the planet, suddenly went postal for petulant reasons and told Richard a few porky pies to cover his tracks?
When the dust settles and the red mist clears...I'm guessing you might be just a teeny weeny bit embarrassed by your recent blog posts about the RDF closure. I've read lot of message board comments and blog posts...even twitter posts...the majority of which refer back to your blog as "proof" everyone has been royally shafted. There's even people posting bullet point summaries of your points on this forum as if it is FACT.
If I was a betting man, my money would be on a rational and valid reason for Josh's actions this week (suddenly pulling the plug).
Rubbish
many of us were on the site at the time, and read the civil whilst vocal comments on the changes, and first hand witnessed the actions that he took thereafter. He's given his reasons, and we have provided factual evidence that he is lying about it. Richard's own post on the front of the forums, is shown with evidence to be quote mined. If you were at all interested, a member here has a cached copy of that thread, which is nothing like what has been insinuated was said.
We've provided pictorial evidence that they redirected wget requests, which were being used to try and archive the site, to a rickroll.
We have provided evidence that the entire staff were lied to about upcoming changes.
Further, it isn't just Peter that has come out against this, it's the entire staff team, all of whom have the exact same story about events.
We still haven't received a plausible reason for deleting the audit trails of Josh and Andrew's actions, we still ahven't recieved a valid reason for shutting down PM's, we still haven't recieved a valid reason for the cneccesity of removing things like the science writing competition or Mazzilles many many evolutionary science links.
Yes some people said some nasty things about Josh, but this was
on another forum, after all the events had transpired, and not the emotional outburst Richard has seen fit to post at the top of his site.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell.