Whose principle? I can have whatever my collection of particles and synapses wants, cos I don't give a cross-sexual interaction which brand of PhilosophyTM you subscribe to.jamest wrote:You cannot have finite agents, in principle. So you know what to do with your happiness.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:This is where you lose the plot a little. Like Dennett, I am quite happy to consider the aggregation of my "physical atoms" as an individual agent with needs, desires, likes, dislikes and AN ALMIGHTY BANHAMMER!jamest wrote:There's no such thing as 'anger', remember? There are only physical atoms/energy interacting. So you can't really blame 'me' for calling 'you' "a cunt" several months ago. That event was purely down to physics. You really need to have a word with yourself for having the audacity to punish fundamental particles/energy obeying the laws of physics.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:You're far too angry at everybody else to be considered an automaton - unless of the extremely dangerous, T-1000 variety.jamest wrote:I couldn't find it in myself to do that, since the implication would be that I'm a mechanism.
Bang out of order.
And I am also far too dunrk to give a shit!