Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scot Dutchy » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:37 pm

Come on kir. Arse hurting a bit?
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Fallible » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:43 pm

That's nice to hear, KIR, after so many of them kept encouraging you to overcome your problems time and time again. I'm sure they'd be made up to see you here singing their praises in such a fashion.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39939
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:55 pm

:drama:
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
keep it real
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by keep it real » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:08 pm

Fallible wrote:That's nice to hear, KIR, after so many of them kept encouraging you to overcome your problems time and time again. I'm sure they'd be made up to see you here singing their praises in such a fashion.
You're a prime example - always judging and hating - no real friendship in sight. And that's all I ever wanted - your friendship and respect. I've given up on you fallible - you're just fucking horrible.

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:37 pm

Relax, have a drink, smoke some fags. It's good that you're here.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Seth » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:50 pm

keep it real wrote:I've had enough of ratskep for now. Ever since they banned Strontium Dog (my mate) for no reason at all it's been irking me. It's like fucking North Korea or Stalinist Russia and now the traffic there is so low 'cos they've banned so many people it's completely incestuous. The site owner never posts, there's no spirit....it's vacuous. So I'm here now, although I'm not as cool as the people that got banned from ratskep (my warning level is 0) at least I can cook my potatoes in peace over here.
Don't bet on it. Kim Jong Ratz is an idea that infects this forum too, as proven by the dozens of reports of direct personal attacks on me and a couple of others that have been reported and dismissed without action by the Mods.

My analysis is that they are allowing those attacks in hopes that one of us will eventually respond in kind, at which point we will be immediately banned.

Hypocrisy is not limited to Ratz by any means.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:20 pm

Seth wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Animavore wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?

Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
Lol, what have you been smoking. I'm a biologist who knows the differences between ethnicity are superficial, as for eugenics well I can't recall making any such claim and I am pro-life so you are being delusional here. You must be projecting your lefty/liberal gulags and mountains of dead bodies on us conservatives for reasons that I cannot ascertain.
You haven't and neither have I. Tyrannical is the only admitted racist here.

Animavore unfortunately cannot distinguish between philosophical argumentation that's anything other than liberal pandering and actual racism. He/she/it wants a leftist echo-chamber snowflake-preserving safe space where his/her/its beliefs are never challenged or even debated. Typical snowflake behavior I'm afraid. Call anything you don't like a Nazi and then whine about it.

It's my policy, when someone calls me a Nazi to my face, to instantly pound the ever-living shit out of them until they cannot move and must then eat their meals through a straw till the bones heal on the premise that calling someone a Nazi who is not actually a Nazi is a mortal insult that in earlier days would have resulted in pistols at dawn...and still should. Then again, it's my experience that those who call others Nazis are cowards who would never do so to someone's face lest they get their faces busted up or get shot in the face. Every person who's ever called me a Nazi has been an anonymous on-line coward afraid to show his/her/its face in person to defend that outrageous, slanderous and legally actionable personal attack.

Which is the only way they survive to do it again.

Now let me do my Kreskin act and predict that Animavore will NOT be sanctioned for this deadly insult by the Mods...or should I say "Mod" (singular).
Animavore's comments are just pathetic, if you want a echo chamber like ratskep then go to ratskep, it already exists. Ratz was set up by Pappa with different values in mind. To demand other places ban speech you don't like is emotionally immature, anti democratic and frankly the very definition of bigotry. I actually believe the anti-fascist are the fascist now due to their anti free speech nature. Though I would never resort to violence except in self defense of myself or my loved ones. Nazis exist and have every right to do so in a democracy, if I was a Nazi I would be open about it, I'm not exactly subtle and I'm no liar.

Image
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:43 pm

JimC wrote:
DaveDoddo007 wrote:

...I'm a biologist...
:funny:

and I'm a male supermodel...
WTF, if you have any evidence that I am lying I suggest you post it. I must of imagined my years at university and when I was working for the pharmaceutical industry. :roll:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:02 pm

I believe you are a biologist of the highest caliber: on a par with the finest that Liberty University can produce

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:08 pm

Seth wrote:
keep it real wrote:I've had enough of ratskep for now. Ever since they banned Strontium Dog (my mate) for no reason at all it's been irking me. It's like fucking North Korea or Stalinist Russia and now the traffic there is so low 'cos they've banned so many people it's completely incestuous. The site owner never posts, there's no spirit....it's vacuous. So I'm here now, although I'm not as cool as the people that got banned from ratskep (my warning level is 0) at least I can cook my potatoes in peace over here.
Don't bet on it. Kim Jong Ratz is an idea that infects this forum too, as proven by the dozens of reports of direct personal attacks on me and a couple of others that have been reported and dismissed without action by the Mods.

My analysis is that they are allowing those attacks in hopes that one of us will eventually respond in kind, at which point we will be immediately banned.

Hypocrisy is not limited to Ratz by any means.
Believe it or not Seth this behaviour is actually a good sign. The lefty/liberal delusion is being exposed for the bullshit it is and they have no other choice but to lash out and call people names and try to censor us. Christ even Mike Blyth of the Watson institute was pointing out Brexit and Trump's election victory was caused by the lefty/liberals abandoning the working class and the poor in favour of the elite, globalist, bankers and corporalists. We conservatives are capitalist but we are not gullible slaves to the 'predator capitalists.' The lefty/liberals are just whores to the 1% and they are too dumb to realize it. :smoke:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
keep it real
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by keep it real » Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:23 pm

Seth wrote:
keep it real wrote:I've had enough of ratskep for now. Ever since they banned Strontium Dog (my mate) for no reason at all it's been irking me. It's like fucking North Korea or Stalinist Russia and now the traffic there is so low 'cos they've banned so many people it's completely incestuous. The site owner never posts, there's no spirit....it's vacuous. So I'm here now, although I'm not as cool as the people that got banned from ratskep (my warning level is 0) at least I can cook my potatoes in peace over here.
Don't bet on it. Kim Jong Ratz is an idea that infects this forum too, as proven by the dozens of reports of direct personal attacks on me and a couple of others that have been reported and dismissed without action by the Mods.

My analysis is that they are allowing those attacks in hopes that one of us will eventually respond in kind, at which point we will be immediately banned.

Hypocrisy is not limited to Ratz by any means.
I don't mind personal attacks - it's their prohibition which creates a seedy under current of malicious resentment which affects posting. If you want to call me a cunt then , please, call me a cunt. It's probably against the rulez tho so perhaps not. I respect honesty and civility above all else and there's just too much repression over on ratskep for me....it's like posting at the point of a hypodermic needle in a sterile genetic research labaratory. I want to feel dammit! Feel!!!111

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39939
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:34 pm

What do you call a lefty/liberal who hasn't abandoned the working class (whatever the biggins that is) in favour of the global elite (whatever the stubbins that is)?

Image
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 10:56 pm

Scott1328 wrote:I believe you are a biologist of the highest caliber: on a par with the finest that Liberty University can produce
Lol, as if lefty/liberals aren't also anti-science when it comes to their favourite ox being gored. Try telling lefty/liberals that their are only two genders and anything else is a mental disorder, body dimorphism isn't a social construct. Murdering babies is not murdering babies when you do it when they are most vulnerable and voiceless (a couple of cells indeed.) Postmodernism and critical theory and their offshoots feminism, SJWism and cultural Marxism are just as batshit insane as any religion.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:12 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:What do you call a lefty/liberal who hasn't abandoned the working class (whatever the biggins that is) in favour of the global elite (whatever the stubbins that is)?
I will call it 'very rare', classic liberals (free speech, free expression and freedom of conscience) old school lefty (collective bargaining for a living wage and working conditions.) What ever happened to them, now it is all identity politics which leads to divide and conquer by your puppet masters the 1%.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39939
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:22 pm

Ok. So everyone who used to believe in the good stuff now just believes in the bad stuff? Have I got that right?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests