Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39941
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Brian Peacock » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:40 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:It has not bounced. :)
Well that's a good sign. Probably some server configuration issue - unless the flat Earthers have hacked in and deleted the db of course.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by JimC » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:39 pm

Ratskeppers will arrive here, like a dog returns to its vomit...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 pm

JimC wrote:Ratskeppers will arrive here, like a dog returns to its vomit...
Nah! Not happening, they would be traumatized by having to listen to different opinions and end up demanding Ratz give them a safe place with play doh, ball pits, pictures of cute kittens and puppies.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by JimC » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:21 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
JimC wrote:Ratskeppers will arrive here, like a dog returns to its vomit...
Nah! Not happening, they would be traumatized by having to listen to different opinions and end up demanding Ratz give them a safe place with play doh, ball pits, pictures of cute kittens and puppies.
We could do that!

And make it the only part of the forum you and Seth could reach! :{D
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Animavore » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:26 pm

Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.

But that's none of my business. :coffee:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:04 pm

JimC wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
JimC wrote:Ratskeppers will arrive here, like a dog returns to its vomit...
Nah! Not happening, they would be traumatized by having to listen to different opinions and end up demanding Ratz give them a safe place with play doh, ball pits, pictures of cute kittens and puppies.
We could do that!

And make it the only part of the forum you and Seth could reach! :{D
Awww you are just saying that to please me. :smoke:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:15 pm

Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:16 pm

Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.

But that's none of my business. :coffee:
I hate to break it to you Animavore but the Nazis are all but gone, A few thousand tattoo'ed thugs with the IQ of a donut dreaming of a 'Boys from Brazil' scenario. If that is your bogeyman then you have little to worry about.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Animavore » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:24 pm

Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?

Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
chango369
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by chango369 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:37 pm

Have you tried b.breisser@gmail.com ?

Code: Select all

Domain Name: RATIONALSKEPTICISM.ORG
Domain ID: D158401913-LROR
WHOIS Server:
Referral URL: http://www.domainmonster.com
Updated Date: 2016-11-09T06:45:28Z
Creation Date: 2010-02-19T08:16:10Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2017-02-19T08:16:10Z
Sponsoring Registrar: Mesh Digital Limited
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 1390
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant ID: MNT7B857821824
Registrant Name: Bernhard Breisser
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: Fortunastr.8
Registrant City: Erftstadt
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Postal Code: 50374
Registrant Country: DE
Registrant Phone: +49.2235699525
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: h2829558@domains.namespace4you.com
Admin ID: MNTAE746799413
Admin Name: Bernhard Breisser
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: Fortunastr.8
Admin City: Erftstadt
Admin State/Province:
Admin Postal Code: 50374
Admin Country: DE
Admin Phone: +49.2235699525
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: b.breisser@gmail.com
Tech ID: MNT90254076972
Tech Name: Domainfactory Hostmaster
Tech Organization: domainfactory GmbH
Tech Street: Oskar-Messter-Strasse 33
Tech City: Ismaning
Tech State/Province:
Tech Postal Code: 85737
Tech Country: DE
Tech Phone: +49.89552660
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +49.8955266222
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: hostmaster@df.eu
Name Server: NS.NAMESPACE4YOU.DE
Name Server: NS2.NAMESPACE4YOU.DE
DNSSEC: unsigned
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-11-23T15:32:51Z <<<

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:42 pm

Animavore wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?

Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
Lol, what have you been smoking. I'm a biologist who knows the differences between ethnicity are superficial, as for eugenics well I can't recall making any such claim and I am pro-life so you are being delusional here. You must be projecting your lefty/liberal gulags and mountains of dead bodies on us conservatives for reasons that I cannot ascertain.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:24 am

Animavore wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?

Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
I wouldn't describe any of those three as Nazis. Tyrannical is the nearest, and he seems to be a white supremacist, which is not quite the same thing.

Anyway, at no point did I say that racial superiority and eugenics were reasonable viewpoints. I merely pointed out that when you start off down the path of silencing the viewpoints of those you deem completely unacceptable, it very rarely ends there.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Seth » Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:24 am

Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.

But that's none of my business. :coffee:
Calling another member a Nazi is a vicious personal attack that violates the FUA and for which you should be suspended. But I'm predicting you won't get so much as a blue note.

So much for "reason" or "ethics" here.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Seth » Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:27 am

Animavore wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?
No, they are points of argument.
Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
And yet another FUA violating personal attack. Where are the Mods I wonder... :dunno:
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Seth » Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:37 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Animavore wrote:
Strontium Dog wrote:
Animavore wrote:Or you could just take a leaf out of RatSkep's book and ban them and show them Nazis won't be tolerated instead of appeasing them. It's one thing to tolerate other viewpoints, it's another to tolerate the intolerable. We know where that leads.
Yes, it leads to people with perfectly reasonable viewpoints being silenced, until there are no views permitted outside of a narrow range of acceptable ones.
You think racial superiority and eugenics are reasonable viewpoints?

Fuck off.

The fact is we have 3 openly Nazi scum on this forum (Seth, Davedodo and Tyrant) who are being appeased when they should be sent packing. And I'm not interested in the view that we should argue against those with morally bankrupt views. You're only arguing in good conscience against those with no conscience.
Lol, what have you been smoking. I'm a biologist who knows the differences between ethnicity are superficial, as for eugenics well I can't recall making any such claim and I am pro-life so you are being delusional here. You must be projecting your lefty/liberal gulags and mountains of dead bodies on us conservatives for reasons that I cannot ascertain.
You haven't and neither have I. Tyrannical is the only admitted racist here.

Animavore unfortunately cannot distinguish between philosophical argumentation that's anything other than liberal pandering and actual racism. He/she/it wants a leftist echo-chamber snowflake-preserving safe space where his/her/its beliefs are never challenged or even debated. Typical snowflake behavior I'm afraid. Call anything you don't like a Nazi and then whine about it.

It's my policy, when someone calls me a Nazi to my face, to instantly pound the ever-living shit out of them until they cannot move and must then eat their meals through a straw till the bones heal on the premise that calling someone a Nazi who is not actually a Nazi is a mortal insult that in earlier days would have resulted in pistols at dawn...and still should. Then again, it's my experience that those who call others Nazis are cowards who would never do so to someone's face lest they get their faces busted up or get shot in the face. Every person who's ever called me a Nazi has been an anonymous on-line coward afraid to show his/her/its face in person to defend that outrageous, slanderous and legally actionable personal attack.

Which is the only way they survive to do it again.

Now let me do my Kreskin act and predict that Animavore will NOT be sanctioned for this deadly insult by the Mods...or should I say "Mod" (singular).
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests