The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
DaveD
Posts: 667
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:59 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by DaveD » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:15 pm

Cannot, or will not.
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Bella Fortuna » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:17 pm

I expect they're too busy feeling superior.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by charlou » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:17 pm

Faaaaark ... This is a joke right? :ddpan:



Ayaan :hug:
Last edited by charlou on Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
no fences

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:17 pm

Ayaan wrote:http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/2207/
In the meantime, I call everyone now to pick sides (not in comments here, but publicly, via Facebook or other social media): are you with us, or with them; are you now a part of the Atheism+ movement, or are you going to stick with Atheism Less?

Then at least we’ll know who to work with. And who to avoid.
I'm having flashbacks to my days as a fundamentalist christian.
Just been reading that. This Carrier chap appears to be a bit of an arse.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by charlou » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:18 pm

Arse is nice ... He's a tool.
no fences

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:19 pm

RiverF wrote:Arse is nice ... He's a tool.
:)

Maybe a berk?
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by charlou » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:20 pm

oh, definitely
no fences

User avatar
SteveB
Nibbler
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
About me: The more you change the less you feel
Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by SteveB » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:20 pm

Carrier was supposed to one of the sane FTB blaggers too. There's another warning about the company you keep.
Twit, twat, twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged! :(

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:25 pm

Nibbler wrote:Carrier was supposed to one of the sane FTB blaggers too. There's another warning about the company you keep.
Oh, he's a "published philosopher" and "World renowned author and speaker", according to what he wrote himself on his own website.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:55 pm

So I was speaking to my friend about this whole Neo-puritan Ape Lust shenanigans and he was having a good chuckle. He did disagree with me on one point though, which was that an elevator was not a suitable place to make a pass at someone. I said I agreed it wasn't ideal but it hardly construes harrassment. His response surprised me.

Essentially he said that a couple of years back when he and his wife were performing with the orchestra in Dublin they were put up in a hotel and a similar incident happened to him. Apparently he got back to the hotel really late one night after the musicians were celebrating the conductors birthday and ended up stuck in this lift with a really really drunk American girl who had been at some conference. He claimed she was barely coherent and crudely propositioned him. He refused but she was angrily persistent. He said "don't take this the wrong way, but I think you need some coffee to sober up." At which point the door opened up and she stumbled out calling him a "faggot" and flipped him the finger.

What?

It might have happened.

Shut up!
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Robert_S » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:00 pm

Shades of Wonko the Sane!
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Robert_S » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:04 pm

Audley Strange wrote:So I was speaking to my friend about this whole Neo-puritan Ape Lust shenanigans and he was having a good chuckle. He did disagree with me on one point though, which was that an elevator was not a suitable place to make a pass at someone. I said I agreed it wasn't ideal but it hardly construes harrassment. His response surprised me.

Essentially he said that a couple of years back when he and his wife were performing with the orchestra in Dublin they were put up in a hotel and a similar incident happened to him. Apparently he got back to the hotel really late one night after the musicians were celebrating the conductors birthday and ended up stuck in this lift with a really really drunk American girl who had been at some conference. He claimed she was barely coherent and crudely propositioned him. He refused but she was angrily persistent. He said "don't take this the wrong way, but I think you need some coffee to sober up." At which point the door opened up and she stumbled out calling him a "faggot" and flipped him the finger.

What?

It might have happened.

Shut up!
:{D
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Rum » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:51 pm

I am going to be issuing cards for genuine atheists. You will need one if you want to be authorised OK? If you don't carry one you can't legally be one. I'm afraid I have to insist on this.

Send £45.

Address upon application.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Jason » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:54 pm

JimC wrote: You should have been a jesuit!

:hehe:
"I will believe that the white that I see is black if the hierarchical Church so defines it." :prof:

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Robert_S » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:57 pm

Rum wrote:I am going to be issuing cards for genuine atheists. You will need one if you want to be authorised OK? If you don't carry one you can't legally be one. I'm afraid I have to insist on this.

Send £45.

Address upon application.
You can't fool me! Genuine Atheist Plus identification is to be tattooed onto the right hand and/or forehead!
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests