What if "Outrage" was not written by Dawkins?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: What if "Outrage" was not written by Dawkins?

Post by Robert_S » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:42 am

It may be authorized and/or penned by Richard, but it is certainly out of character with the person I thought Richard was.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: What if "Outrage" was not written by Dawkins?

Post by kiki5711 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:57 am

In addition direct insults like that would have been noted and dealt with by moderators and they were doing a good job at being quick about it.

I think he is more displeased with numerous negative comments he was getting about his books and certain things in them. Most of the criticizing was not vulgar and were valid questions that Richard either never answered or he answered with annoyance.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: What if "Outrage" was not written by Dawkins?

Post by Robert_S » Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:12 am

I just find it sad.

I defended Richard's reputation and ideas for a long time. If we shat on like we were, I would probably be posting that we ought to give the new system a chance, provided there was always an option to scrap it and go back to the forum format if it didn't work. If we were not being shat on I would be posting that on RDF.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest