Rationalskepiticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by cronus » Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:14 pm

Rationalia does the tails with IQ, and as IQ reaches off the graph on either side so :{D :holcheer: :nono: :demon: :read:
Ratskep contains the middle ground hence its confomist nature. :coffee: :prof: :blah:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:06 pm

surreptitious57 wrote:Contrast that with over here where no one has ever been banned [ although I understand C J and Exi5tentialist made themselves very unpopular and more or less had to go. C J was a bit before my time but I remember Exi ]
Just to put this straight.

CJ was banned. To date, he is the only member to be permanently banned except by their own request. He was a scumbag of the highest order that abused his staff privileges and used this place as his private stalking pond (among other things).

Exi5tentialist received a warning for "intentional malicious trolling" and then demanded that his account be deleted. He was permanently banned as a compromise. He has since had his account reinstated at his own request but no longer posts.

Numerous others have been banned but always because they asked to be and they are all welcome to have the bans lifted on request. Apart from spammers - we don't class those as real people - just something to be scraped off the soles of our shoes.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by JimC » Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:01 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
surreptitious57 wrote:Contrast that with over here where no one has ever been banned [ although I understand C J and Exi5tentialist made themselves very unpopular and more or less had to go. C J was a bit before my time but I remember Exi ]
Just to put this straight.

CJ was banned. To date, he is the only member to be permanently banned except by their own request. He was a scumbag of the highest order that abused his staff privileges and used this place as his private stalking pond (among other things).

Exi5tentialist received a warning for "intentional malicious trolling" and then demanded that his account be deleted. He was permanently banned as a compromise. He has since had his account reinstated at his own request but no longer posts.

Numerous others have been banned but always because they asked to be and they are all welcome to have the bans lifted on request. Apart from spammers - we don't class those as real people - just something to be scraped off the soles of our shoes.
Exi5 sometimes lurks, like a strange phantom, just at the periphery of one's vision... :?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:58 am

Scott1328 wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:You and rEv should get a room. :tea:
The difference being that rEv is still missed at RatSkep
:qoti: Someone remembers me!! :{D
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by charlou » Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:35 am

Methinks surr was referring to chuck jones as cj.
no fences

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Audley Strange » Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:48 am

surreptitious57 wrote: I take all comers.
:{D
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39933
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Brian Peacock » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:06 pm

charlou wrote:Methinks surr was referring to chuck jones as cj.
One for the 'Where are they now?' thread.

Oh hang on - I think he's on ignore. :)
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Pappa » Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:59 pm

charlou wrote:Methinks surr was referring to chuck jones as cj.
Yeah, me too.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:47 pm

aspire1670 wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:What a fucking joke of a site, calling yourself both rational and skeptical should at least mean there is some bar at which you hold your site to. Though in this sites case they are trying to compete with atheism+/FTB/Skepchick to be the most censorious fuckwits in the atheism blogosphere/forums and achieving that goal. How do they hope to get any discussion going whilst blocking/suspending anybody who doesn't fit their ideological narrative. The only 'obeying orders' fits right in with these clownshoes though even then they enforce the rules, they do it arbitrary, this will be no surprise to most of the posters here. Is any of the fucking wankstains that make up ratskep have anything to say to me well stop being cowards and do it here. Of course this is not going to happen as they might have to back up their opinions with evidence, facts, logic, reason and science and that will never do. It seems like anybody can call themselves rational and skeptical and if you come across a different opinion you don't like well just ban or suspend it as the truth hurts my fee fees. This is shown to be true by the arbitrary way they hand out bans and suspensions. They should hang their collective heads in shame but as they have no ethics then it is beyond their capacity for empathy so fuck them cunts. :lay: :lay: :lay:

Tl;dr, ratskep are fucking cowardly bunch of cunts.
Poor Davey still can't get over discovering that the world is not obligated to listen to him. Hey, you could always create your own forum, Davey, and tell the world how you once had your sperm burgled and that the wimminz have taken away all your rights.
Erm...I think you are getting MGTOW/men's rights mixed up.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:48 pm

Scott1328 wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:You and rEv should get a room. :tea:
The difference being that rEv is still missed at RatSkep
Who are you again?
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Scott1328 » Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:05 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:You and rEv should get a room. :tea:
The difference being that rEv is still missed at RatSkep
Who are you again?
Nobody. I am just having a good laugh at you

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Robert_S » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:20 am

LOL.

Dave, after how I've been treated by you, I don't take any unsupported accusations by you very seriously.

rEv, I've seen you pull shit here that would have gotten you banned at 99% of the fora out there.

MGTOW, good for you!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GN2kpBoFs4[/youtube]
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

aspire1670
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:37 pm

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by aspire1670 » Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:11 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
aspire1670 wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:What a fucking joke of a site, calling yourself both rational and skeptical should at least mean there is some bar at which you hold your site to. Though in this sites case they are trying to compete with atheism+/FTB/Skepchick to be the most censorious fuckwits in the atheism blogosphere/forums and achieving that goal. How do they hope to get any discussion going whilst blocking/suspending anybody who doesn't fit their ideological narrative. The only 'obeying orders' fits right in with these clownshoes though even then they enforce the rules, they do it arbitrary, this will be no surprise to most of the posters here. Is any of the fucking wankstains that make up ratskep have anything to say to me well stop being cowards and do it here. Of course this is not going to happen as they might have to back up their opinions with evidence, facts, logic, reason and science and that will never do. It seems like anybody can call themselves rational and skeptical and if you come across a different opinion you don't like well just ban or suspend it as the truth hurts my fee fees. This is shown to be true by the arbitrary way they hand out bans and suspensions. They should hang their collective heads in shame but as they have no ethics then it is beyond their capacity for empathy so fuck them cunts. :lay: :lay: :lay:

Tl;dr, ratskep are fucking cowardly bunch of cunts.
Poor Davey still can't get over discovering that the world is not obligated to listen to him. Hey, you could always create your own forum, Davey, and tell the world how you once had your sperm burgled and that the wimminz have taken away all your rights.
Erm...I think you are getting MGTOW/men's rights mixed up.
Poor Davey, my irony meter exploded reading your reply. You're so mixed up about everything that you still believe you have a right to be heard. Pro tip: freedom of speech doesn't mean what you think it means.
All rights have to be voted on. That's how they become rights.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:17 pm

Robert_S wrote: rEv, I've seen you pull shit here that would have gotten you banned at 99% of the fora out there.
I'm so bannable that I just found out I'm banned from a forum I have never visited before... :lol:
FireShot Pro Screen Capture #188 - 'The VideoLAN Forums • Information' - forum_videolan_org_viewtopic_php_t=56514&f=14.jpg
:{D
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by JimC » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:05 pm

Pre-emptive banning!
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests