Non sexual intimacy.

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Thinking Aloud » Sat May 01, 2010 3:05 pm

Svartalf wrote:Floppit, you lost me from thread title.

I do admit that I'm likely seriously neurotic, but what are you going on about? Non sexual intimacy? I just hate being touched at all unless the lady and I are in bed, or going to be very soon, and touchy feely guys give me a certain urge to puke when I happen to be the object of their attention.... that or my adrenalin starts flowing and the fight or flight response kicks in.

What I don't get is why you seem to regard that as quite bad.
For many years I had a phobia about being touched. By anyone. In any way.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by maiforpeace » Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 pm

floppit wrote: Now, in my social group there is little if any religion left but the reservations it left are still going strong. I could count on one hand the times I have hugged my best friend of 28yrs.
I kind of understand what you are referring to when it comes to society in general, but I found this a little odd. Maybe it's a British thing?

I can't think of a time when I don't hug and kiss my friends (a big, bear hug, and a kiss on the lips) at least once when I first see them, usually two or three times during the course of meeting up, because there's always something we discuss or share that brings us close together. I even do this with people who are just warm acquaintances, like members of my toastmasters group.

I think human contact in non-sexualized ways is absolutely essential for our well being, and like you I think we don't do it enough. I spend time at a nursing home with residents and one of their favorite activities is a hand massage. When I first introduced this activity they were very reluctant and uncomfortable with the idea, now they get in line for them. :biggrin:

I never hug or kiss someone I am getting to know, or for the first time, without asking first, but I always ask. Most of the time people respond, and for those who don't, we still shake hands or put an arm around each other to show some intimacy.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
floppit
Forum Mebmer
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by floppit » Sat May 01, 2010 6:54 pm

Nah - I'm not one for unexpectedly hugging someone, and the cheek kiss confuses me but I grew up in a culture where it doesn't happen and there's no way I can view or know who I would have been had I lived where it is routine.

What I'm saying is that I'd find it bloody odd that as group animals we are meant to naturally find touch outside of sex scary or repulsive. Evidently (and naturally) they'd always be degrees with those who are 'touchy feely' and those who aren't so much so but it doesn't have to be an embrace! To tap someone on the shoulder rather than shout in a noisy place isn't an invasion unless they are extremely highly strung - yet me, personally, I had to actually teach myself to do it. I shared an office with someone deaf and it took me ages to get over having to tap before speaking (that was 10 years ago!). My FIL is very deaf and I still don't find it a whole heap easier.

I'd never hold an elderly person's hand unless they offered it to me but it does make a fundamental difference to then hold it warmly and without plotting an early escape.

Just to be clear, I'm not talking about camp behaviour done for effect, I'm talking about genuine contact in caring situations. I still think the west has it wrong, not that all should hug everyone everyday, people should be different, just that it's form of communication being left to rot and I think it's an important one.
"Whatever it is, it spits and it goes 'WAAARGHHHHHHHH' - that's probably enough to suggest you shouldn't argue with it." Mousy.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Rum » Sat May 01, 2010 9:05 pm

This is all a bit of a puzzle. If you go to the Middle East or Asia (as examples) you see men holding hands and arms over each other shoulders all the time. You see that in the UK too - when the pubs are open on a Friday and Saturday night and the inhibitions are down! Something odd going on.

Berthold
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Berthold » Wed May 05, 2010 4:49 pm

In the Slav nations, kissing is the common form of greeting, comparable to a handshake in central Europe (I know the Brits even rarely shake hands ;) ).

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Hermit » Sun May 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Excellent topic, Floppit.
Rum wrote:I think the issue is that all contact of the kind you are describing has been sexualized. I have been thinking since reading your post about why that might be. You can't cuddle a kid any more without someone looking at you suspiciously. You can't swim naked any more as people used to do commonly. You can't share a bath with your kids without wondering if it might be viewed as a 'bad thing'.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I think the removal of public intimacy happened at the same time as the clampdown on sexuality - ie. the early Victorian era. It was part and parcel of the same mindset. Somehow, we have dropped the sexual inhibitions but kept the ones pertaining to public displays of affection - bizarre! :dono:
A bit of both, I think.

I recall two female speakers speaking out against lesbianism at a conference in China. They were holding hands for the entire duration of their turn at the microphone. Also, it is a pity that we in occidental cultures can't caress, cuddle, massage and kiss our human companions and friends the way many of us do with our pets, without incurring severe opprobrium.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sun May 16, 2010 4:37 pm

Seraph wrote:Excellent topic, Floppit.
Rum wrote:I think the issue is that all contact of the kind you are describing has been sexualized. I have been thinking since reading your post about why that might be. You can't cuddle a kid any more without someone looking at you suspiciously. You can't swim naked any more as people used to do commonly. You can't share a bath with your kids without wondering if it might be viewed as a 'bad thing'.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I think the removal of public intimacy happened at the same time as the clampdown on sexuality - ie. the early Victorian era. It was part and parcel of the same mindset. Somehow, we have dropped the sexual inhibitions but kept the ones pertaining to public displays of affection - bizarre! :dono:
A bit of both, I think.

I recall two female speakers speaking out against lesbianism at a conference in China. They were holding hands for the entire duration of their turn at the microphone. Also, it is a pity that we in occidental cultures can't caress, cuddle, massage and kiss our human companions and friends the way many of us do with our pets, without incurring severe opprobrium.
I get a huge throbbing opprobrium every time I caress, cuddle, massage and kiss a woman - I quite like it, actually. :shifty:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Link
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:19 pm
About me: I'm here to save the princess Zelda
Location: Shakespeareville
Contact:

Re: Non sexual intimacy.

Post by Link » Sun May 16, 2010 8:18 pm

My mates will regularily get a giant bear hug if we're saying hello/goodbye/randomly meeting in a crowded street.

We also often say we love each other, It's just never been a big deal and we are all comfortable enough with ourselves and each other to know that it's non-sexual.

I think it depends entirely on the person as well, there are people I know that aren't overly comfortable with expressing their affection even to their closest family and then their are others who will just walk up to you and give you a bone crushing hug.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests