Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

User avatar
Just saying
Posts: 23357
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: Something something birds
Location: USA

Re: Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

Post by Tero » Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:32 pm ... ate_en.pdf

labeled as occupational hazard. Low risk to consumers of crops
Schinasi L, Leon ME (Apr 2014). "Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and occupational exposure to agricultural pesticide chemical groups and active ingredients: a systematic review and meta-analysis". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 11 (4): 4449–527. PMC 4025008 Freely accessible. PMID 24762670. doi:10.3390/ijerph110404449. (:_funny_:)
Guns? Guns: ... 9c76_z.jpg
This is how American politics goes
1 Republicans cut tax, let everything run down to barely working...8 years
2 Democrats fix public spending to normal...8 years
Rinse, repeat.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 11682
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I identify as sexually arousing to women.

Re: Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:25 pm

March 25, 2017 - ... en-by-echa

Not a carcinogen. It "...concluded that the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or as toxic for reproduction."
If you ever feel sad, remember that somewhere in the world there is a fat kid dropping his favorite ice cream cone.

I'm not Steve Bannon. I'm not trying to suck my own c**k. - Anthony Scaramucci.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest