
Free will?
- MissingNo.
- Cheese is christ
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:10 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
*turns to page 86*
Re: Free will?
I think you'll like this:
http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=273
just for the record - I'm a materialist rather than dualist, you?
http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=273
just for the record - I'm a materialist rather than dualist, you?
"Whatever it is, it spits and it goes 'WAAARGHHHHHHHH' - that's probably enough to suggest you shouldn't argue with it." Mousy.
Re: Free will?
This is a great book relating to this issue.


Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.floppit wrote:I think you'll like this:
http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=273
just for the record - I'm a materialist rather than dualist, you?

I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
Re: Free will?
You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
"Whatever it is, it spits and it goes 'WAAARGHHHHHHHH' - that's probably enough to suggest you shouldn't argue with it." Mousy.
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
I think it is a non-question (generally - not dismissing you Flop). There is no 'dual' to be dualist about in my book.floppit wrote:I think you'll like this:
http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=273
just for the record - I'm a materialist rather than dualist, you?
The original issue arose from the idea that human beings might have a spark of the divine in them. Buddhists usually believe that we are all 'one' and that separation from the universal is 'dualist' and incorrect. Christianity tends (though there have been stands that don't agree..and they were heavily persecuted way back) who believe that this 'spark' is a separate thing - a 'soul' which has nothing to do with a unified whole - a dualisic view.
All complete gobbledegook and nonsense of course. I used to get involved in discussions about this sort of rubbish in years gone by.
Of course you may be talking about something totally different.

- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
I don't believe in the human contribution to anything. If you're talking about the human contribution to human extinction, well, overpopulation comes and goes. If it goes far enough, extinction is the result.floppit wrote:You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
Believing in stuff is sort of my basis for not caring. How can you expect a species that "believes in stuff" to matter in the long run? It's an evolutionary dead end.
Last edited by Surendra Darathy on Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
Nuclear weapons.Surendra Darathy wrote:I don't believe in the human contribution to anything. If you're talking about the human contribution to human extinction, well, overpopulation comes and goes. If it goes far enough, extinction is the result.floppit wrote:You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
So what? A species that can invent its own suicide pill? Who's going to be around to write the obituary? The fossil record, that's who!Gawdzilla wrote:Nuclear weapons.Surendra Darathy wrote:I don't believe in the human contribution to anything. If you're talking about the human contribution to human extinction, well, overpopulation comes and goes. If it goes far enough, extinction is the result.floppit wrote:You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
An issue which crops up here regularly and which our cowardly politicians seem unable to even get the merest of grip upon. The too many people issue may well end up killing us all.Surendra Darathy wrote:I don't believe in the human contribution to anything. If you're talking about the human contribution to human extinction, well, overpopulation comes and goes. If it goes far enough, extinction is the result.floppit wrote:You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
Believing in stuff is sort of my basis for not caring. How can you expect a species that "believes in stuff" to matter in the long run? It's an evolutionary dead end.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
Don't weep. This will be a good thing in the long run!Rum wrote:The too many people issue may well end up killing us all.
What? No one to remember us? Quelle domage!
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
Sorry, but we can kill 99.9999% of life on Earth if we go nuts with those things. That's a "contribution" whether you like it or not.Surendra Darathy wrote:So what? A species that can invent its own suicide pill? Who's going to be around to write the obituary? The fossil record, that's who!Gawdzilla wrote:Nuclear weapons.Surendra Darathy wrote:I don't believe in the human contribution to anything. If you're talking about the human contribution to human extinction, well, overpopulation comes and goes. If it goes far enough, extinction is the result.floppit wrote:You don't believe in the human contributions to climate change then? After all, wasn't the weather one of the bastions of what humans could not effect?That's fine, as long as you recognise that nothing you do or say matters in the long run.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
Look at my avatar. What did you expect me to say? Who the fuck is watching the show?Gawdzilla wrote: Sorry, but we can kill 99.9999% of life on Earth if we go nuts with those things. That's a "contribution" whether you like it or not.
I'm not vivocentric. Lichens eat rocks. Who will stand up for the rocks?
Rocks erode. Abolish the Second Law of Thermodynamics!
Last edited by Surendra Darathy on Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Free will?
Whether we live, as a race, a few more thousand or more years, or die in the next 100 or so years is a matter of total indifference to the universe at large. This, as an atheist, is very liberating in one way, but it is also supremely sad. Our moment will come and either sooner or perhaps later, will have gone and none of it will have mattered. And nobody will remain to remember.Surendra Darathy wrote:Don't weep. This will be a good thing in the long run!Rum wrote:The too many people issue may well end up killing us all.
What? No one to remember us? Quelle domage!
You can see why religion has had its adherents.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests