Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
Joe wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:43 pm
I wouldn't say Omar's all that safe. We have a
lot of mentally ill people in the US, and while most live normal lives, it only takes one person to be triggered by Trump's provocative rhetoric to cause her harm.
Some antifa whacko tried to firebomb a detention center because the leftie politicians started with this 'rhetoric' about concentration camps.
So the left insists the story isn't newsworthy.
Sean King called for more of those attacks. What about
his rhetoric?
There is plenty of bullshit coming out of both sides. The interesting thing is the difference in media coverage from when they cover a politically blue whackjob vs when they cover a politically red one.
Trump uses provocative language to trigger the emotional dems into focusing on the wrong thing. Racist tweet gets endless attention. Ending asylum for central and south americans gets very little by comparison.
Let's have a close look at your reply.
Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
Some antifa whacko tried to...
First of all, your reply is totally disconnected from the post you purport to be reacting to. Congratulations for once again changing the subject.
Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
...this 'rhetoric' about concentration camps.
Secondly, there is no rhetorical element. The euphemistically labelled "detention centers" are in fact concentration camps. Here is
Merriam-Webster's definition of "concentration camp" for the third time: "
a place where large numbers of people (such as prisoners of war, political prisoners, refugees, or the members of an ethnic or religious minority) are detained or confined under armed guard" It has also been repeatedly pointed out to you that the British have built such camps between 1899 and 1902 during the Boer war, which they themselves have called "concentration camps". The camps built by, or on behalf of, the US government's Department of Border Security fit the definition perfectly.
Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
So the left insists the story isn't newsworthy.
Thirdly, that is a lie, and you know it, for I have pointed out to you five days ago that the assertion is factually wrong. At that time I wrote that "I use Google, and it just coughed up 40,200 results about a 69 year old man named Willem
Bronsen [typo. That should be "Spronsen"] who was fatally shot when he threw flares at the Northwest Detention Centre in Tacoma around 4am on Saturday, set vehicles on fire and tried to ignite a propane tank. Among the thousands of publishers of the reports concerning the attack were the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Guardian, the Independent, the Daily Beast, ABC news, Reuters, Daily Kos, the BBC, NBC..."
Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
Fourthly, Sean King called for more of those attacks.
No, Shaun King has not. He has described Bronsen's letter as beautiful, painful and devastating. Show me where King called for more of those attacks. Describing Bronson as not crazy certainly falls short of that.
Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 8:11 pm
There is plenty of bullshit coming out of both sides. The interesting thing is the difference in media coverage from when they cover a politically blue whackjob vs when they cover a politically red one.
Trump uses provocative language to trigger the emotional dems into focusing on the wrong thing. Racist tweet gets endless attention. Ending asylum for central and south americans gets very little by comparison.
Now you're just repeating your irrelevant nonsense.
Joe's entire post, from which you snipped a fragment, was about the safety, or lack thereof, of Ilhan Omar, and you said nothing at all about it in yours, preferring to repeat your counterfactual assertions instead.