War
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
War
We in Australia and New Zealand are commemorating our involvement in them today. We call it ANZAC day. The last two letters of the acronym stand for "and Canada" but I don't know if Canadians have a similar holiday.
We arrived in Gallipoli in 1915 under British command and were beaten with heavy losses on all sides. In 1933 the president of Turkey said:
"Heroes who shed their blood and lost their lives! You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well." - Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
If you have family who took part in any of the world wars and told you about it, you'll most likely know exactly what Atatürk meant. I do. Both my grandfathers were dutiful officers throughout the entire length of them as officers, and my father finished up as a 21 year old lieutenant when he was taken prisoner by the Americans a month or two before the end of WWII. All of them realised they felt duty-bound to kill fellow humans for reasons that can only be described as absurd by sane ones.
The quote above was from 1933. It's from the same man, who as a front line commander at Gallipoli said: "Men, I am not ordering you to attack. I am ordering you to die. In the time that it takes us to die, other forces and commanders can come and take our place." (Orders to the 57th Infantry Regiment, at the Battle of Gallipoli, 25 April 1915)
And some people have no idea why I loathe and hate nationalism as well as its kin, patriotism. When will it be realised that the soldiers who do the killing have more in common with the people they are sent out to kill than those who they do the killing on behalf of?
What's your take on this?
We arrived in Gallipoli in 1915 under British command and were beaten with heavy losses on all sides. In 1933 the president of Turkey said:
"Heroes who shed their blood and lost their lives! You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well." - Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
If you have family who took part in any of the world wars and told you about it, you'll most likely know exactly what Atatürk meant. I do. Both my grandfathers were dutiful officers throughout the entire length of them as officers, and my father finished up as a 21 year old lieutenant when he was taken prisoner by the Americans a month or two before the end of WWII. All of them realised they felt duty-bound to kill fellow humans for reasons that can only be described as absurd by sane ones.
The quote above was from 1933. It's from the same man, who as a front line commander at Gallipoli said: "Men, I am not ordering you to attack. I am ordering you to die. In the time that it takes us to die, other forces and commanders can come and take our place." (Orders to the 57th Infantry Regiment, at the Battle of Gallipoli, 25 April 1915)
And some people have no idea why I loathe and hate nationalism as well as its kin, patriotism. When will it be realised that the soldiers who do the killing have more in common with the people they are sent out to kill than those who they do the killing on behalf of?
What's your take on this?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: War
Gets me every time I hear it.
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: War
It is an unspeakable evil Seraph and I agree with every word.
Although the Europe projects has many faults I am a huge supporter because it has done much to erode borders and nationalism. Brobably not enough, but a lot.
Although the Europe projects has many faults I am a huge supporter because it has done much to erode borders and nationalism. Brobably not enough, but a lot.
- Thumpalumpacus
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
- About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
- Contact:
Re: War
I'm not a combat veteran. I was a firefighter in the US Air Force. Wars suck, and especially so for those who do the killing and dying at the behest of flag-waving assholes who would wilt at the thought of basic training, much less a life-or-death situation.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
- Atheist-Lite
- Formerly known as Crumple
- Posts: 8745
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
- About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
- Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
- Contact:
Re: War
Strange as it may sound but Crumple is very anti-war. Can you imagine how much work it takes to sort out the paperwork afterwards?

nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: War
To Seraph
Hate to correct you, but ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Because it was that group that, on the behest of incompetent British generals, went to die at Gallipoli.
Of course, the commemoration has now been extended to represent everyone who fought overseas in whatever war who came from Oz or NZ.
My father was a veteran in WWII, and served with distinction, winning the Military Medal and bar, and MID twice. After his return, he settled down as a farmer, husband and father, and passed on to me, his son, a hatred of war.
Hate to correct you, but ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Because it was that group that, on the behest of incompetent British generals, went to die at Gallipoli.
Of course, the commemoration has now been extended to represent everyone who fought overseas in whatever war who came from Oz or NZ.
My father was a veteran in WWII, and served with distinction, winning the Military Medal and bar, and MID twice. After his return, he settled down as a farmer, husband and father, and passed on to me, his son, a hatred of war.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: War
Thanks, and don't hate it. I am always happy to be corrected. As a matter of fact, I pasted the opening post at MindRomp a few days ago as well - replete with the same mistake - and corrected myself earlier today, but forgot to do the same here, probably because the discussion is a lot more alive over there. It's clocked up 44 posts while this one has seven in the same time once I hit the "post bollocks" button.Blind groper wrote:Hate to correct you, but ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Thumpalumpacus
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
- About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
- Contact:
Re: War
Were they not called "ANZAC" in the Second World War as well? I had always thought that they were, in North Africa at least.Blind groper wrote:To Seraph
Hate to correct you, but ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Because it was that group that, on the behest of incompetent British generals, went to die at Gallipoli.
Of course, the commemoration has now been extended to represent everyone who fought overseas in whatever war who came from Oz or NZ.
My father was a veteran in WWII, and served with distinction, winning the Military Medal and bar, and MID twice. After his return, he settled down as a farmer, husband and father, and passed on to me, his son, a hatred of war.
And respects to your father.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: War
Thumpa
Like lots of words, usage changes the meaning. ANZAC has changed its meaning to include any Australian and NZ military group serving overseas.
Thanks for your respects. My Dad died a few years back, but his memory lives on in me, along with much love and respect. I have his medals, including the Military Medal, and I wear them on his behalf when appropriate.
My father was a man with a very strong sense of duty, and he performed that duty with distinction. However, he hated what was happening in WWII, and spoke to me of that hatred. He fought in North Africa and was responsible for rounding up many prisoners, both German and Italian. Strangely, the New Zealanders and the 'enemy' proved compatible and many became firm friends. My father was especially fond of the Italians, who did not want to be at war, since they did not believe in the cause their side fought for, and were gentle and cooperative as prisoners, and very friendly with the NZ soldiers.
My Dad was part of the 'liberation' of Italy, and he found the Italians, in the villages they cleared of enemy, were just as friendly, and often deliriously happy to see the back of the Axis soldiers, and welcomed the NZers with open arms. When you see your 'enemy' as fellow and deserving humans, it is hard to love war.
Like lots of words, usage changes the meaning. ANZAC has changed its meaning to include any Australian and NZ military group serving overseas.
Thanks for your respects. My Dad died a few years back, but his memory lives on in me, along with much love and respect. I have his medals, including the Military Medal, and I wear them on his behalf when appropriate.
My father was a man with a very strong sense of duty, and he performed that duty with distinction. However, he hated what was happening in WWII, and spoke to me of that hatred. He fought in North Africa and was responsible for rounding up many prisoners, both German and Italian. Strangely, the New Zealanders and the 'enemy' proved compatible and many became firm friends. My father was especially fond of the Italians, who did not want to be at war, since they did not believe in the cause their side fought for, and were gentle and cooperative as prisoners, and very friendly with the NZ soldiers.
My Dad was part of the 'liberation' of Italy, and he found the Italians, in the villages they cleared of enemy, were just as friendly, and often deliriously happy to see the back of the Axis soldiers, and welcomed the NZers with open arms. When you see your 'enemy' as fellow and deserving humans, it is hard to love war.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Thumpalumpacus
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
- About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
- Contact:
Re: War
Indeed, I imagine that's the case. Most of the combat veterans whom I know seem to have lost any anger towards their opponents with the years, though it's true that some hang onto old bitterness. I'm glad for your father's sake that he was able to find his way to keep his humanity in what had to be terribly inhuman conditions.
My grandfather died over Western Europe in 1943; his B-17 went missing. I'd like to think that he too would've found his peace as your father did. My father and step-father both served in Vietnam. I'm not a combat vet myself, but I know many; I don't know one who loves war, and I won't lie, I'm glad that I only have learned to detest it in the abstract, from listening to them.
My grandfather died over Western Europe in 1943; his B-17 went missing. I'd like to think that he too would've found his peace as your father did. My father and step-father both served in Vietnam. I'm not a combat vet myself, but I know many; I don't know one who loves war, and I won't lie, I'm glad that I only have learned to detest it in the abstract, from listening to them.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: War
Thumpa
Nice to see we have something in common.
My feeling towards war is kinda ambivalent.
There is a saying : "To resort to violence is the last resort of the incompetent."
I believe that to be incorrect. The problem is that those leaders who are incompetent resort to violence long before it has become the last resort. Capable, or even great, leaders will be prepared to resort to violence, but not till every other option has been cleared.
War as a tool is something to be avoided, not quite at all costs, but until the costs of avoidance become unthinkable. America was right to go to war against Japan after Pearl Harbour. She was wrong to go to war in Viet Nam. The distinction is vitally important, and our leaders demonstrate their quality by showing that they appreciate that difference.
Nice to see we have something in common.
My feeling towards war is kinda ambivalent.
There is a saying : "To resort to violence is the last resort of the incompetent."
I believe that to be incorrect. The problem is that those leaders who are incompetent resort to violence long before it has become the last resort. Capable, or even great, leaders will be prepared to resort to violence, but not till every other option has been cleared.
War as a tool is something to be avoided, not quite at all costs, but until the costs of avoidance become unthinkable. America was right to go to war against Japan after Pearl Harbour. She was wrong to go to war in Viet Nam. The distinction is vitally important, and our leaders demonstrate their quality by showing that they appreciate that difference.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: War
The US was founded in part to avoid Europe's infantile ego wars, unfortunately British treachery over the Lusitania dragged us into WWI.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Thumpalumpacus
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
- About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
- Contact:
Re: War
Blind groper wrote:Thumpa
Nice to see we have something in common.
My feeling towards war is kinda ambivalent.
There is a saying : "To resort to violence is the last resort of the incompetent."
I believe that to be incorrect. The problem is that those leaders who are incompetent resort to violence long before it has become the last resort. Capable, or even great, leaders will be prepared to resort to violence, but not till every other option has been cleared.
War as a tool is something to be avoided, not quite at all costs, but until the costs of avoidance become unthinkable. America was right to go to war against Japan after Pearl Harbour. She was wrong to go to war in Viet Nam. The distinction is vitally important, and our leaders demonstrate their quality by showing that they appreciate that difference.
I certainly agree with those sentiments. It's my opinion that war is the penance paid by normal folk for the folly of leaders they elect, or tolerate. It's true that a war may be just, but that's cold comfort to those who suffer from it.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: War
Pardon?Tyrannical wrote:The US was founded in part to avoid Europe's infantile ego wars, unfortunately British treachery over the Lusitania dragged us into WWI.
- Jesus_of_Nazareth
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:09 pm
- Location: In your heart!
- Contact:
Re: War
Seraph wrote: And some people have no idea why I loathe and hate nationalism as well as its kin, patriotism.
Although not very patriotic I am a nationalist.(I'm British - so not much to shout about, let alone attach a bayonet for to defend).
Nationalism is what stops your tribe being overrun by "them". There is always a them.
The alternative is that you give away what you (and your forebears) have worked for (or stolen!) over generations, at which point the smart folks look around and decide that not worth them adding into the group pot (whether done consciously or not)....as "them" is always more numerous than "us" and want more than we can ever have.
Used to be that the "Them" arrived with Armies and stole everything you had and then destroyed your culture / way of life - now it is by jumbo jet, under the name of mass immigration - aided and abetted by Spivs seeking short term financial gain and wishful thinkers who can't see how their own longterm prosperity (for self and kids) is linked to not sharing with every tom, dick and mohammed who has hand out 5 minutes after arriving....lets all sit in one big tent, holding hands and singing Kumbayah

As I said, have no personal intention of fixing a bayonet on broom handle - don't mean I am a pacifist. Would happily drop nukes on Muslims for looking at "us" funny, let alone 'em blowing our stuff up. But apparently that not very PC

Get me to a Nunnery 
"Jesus also thinks you're a Cunt - FACT" branded leisure wear now available from selected retailers. Or simply send a prayer to the usual address.

"Jesus also thinks you're a Cunt - FACT" branded leisure wear now available from selected retailers. Or simply send a prayer to the usual address.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests