Metaphysics as an Error

Locked
SpeedOfSound
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:05 am
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by SpeedOfSound » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

jamest wrote:
SpeedOfSound wrote:I see you lurking jamest. Answer my post above so we can get on to your observer hypothesis.
I'm supposed to be doing an assignment. I just keep popping my head in to see the latest developments, but I don't really have time for any lengthy discussion right now. And I really do wish that you would elucidate or link me to a post so that I know what you're asking me.
I just linked you to two posts in a previous post. Just let me know when you are actually ready.
Favorite quote:
lifegazer says "Now, the only way to proceed to claim that brains create experience, is to believe that real brains exist (we certainly cannot study them). And if a scientist does this, he transcends the barriers of both science and metaphysics."

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Surendra Darathy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:41 pm

SpeedOfSound wrote: Please respond
to those two.
How it's done. Here's another way.
SpeedOfSound wrote:Is data a self-construct? Is there treeness?
SpeedOfSound wrote:Why is the data(treeness) not relevant?
Is this too much effort cutting and pasting for too small a yield? Who can decide that?

Is it possible to communicate by asking and pretending to answer questions posed in these forms? Depends on how you define "communicate".

And so it goes with metaphysics: "It all depends on what you mean by 'metaphysics'".

The point of the OP is that when we ask those who propose to discuss metaphysics to consider metaphysics as an error, they start talking about "existence" instead, without a commitment to the sort of discourse we are going to be having.

IS an "observation" only an act that can be subsumed under what we all recognise as empirical, or is the subjective conviction of an ordering principle in the universe equally an "observation". All the two actions have in common is the capacity to lay words around them.

It is clear that there is a discourse of subjective convictions. Can it be "legitimated" by expressing itself?

Is saying "legitimate" self-legitimating? Have we figured out a means to dictate an infinite amount of nonsense about nothing?
Last edited by Surendra Darathy on Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by FBM » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:47 pm

Guys and gals: I'm going to temporarily lock this thread due to the number of complaints I've gotten by PM in the last little while. I repeat: this is just temporary. It's 1:45 a.m. here and I'm going to pass the problem on to whoever is up to the task. Please hold your thoughts for just a bit until the matter is processed. Thanks for your patience.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Surendra Darathy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:50 pm

"In before the lock" :biggrin:
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

User avatar
Luis Dias
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Luis Dias » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:54 pm

2nd :biggrin:

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by FBM » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:57 pm

Hush! I'll get to it... :biggrin:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

SpeedOfSound
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:05 am
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by SpeedOfSound » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:04 pm

Now who's complaining? Christ, I just want to know about treeness.
Favorite quote:
lifegazer says "Now, the only way to proceed to claim that brains create experience, is to believe that real brains exist (we certainly cannot study them). And if a scientist does this, he transcends the barriers of both science and metaphysics."

User avatar
Surendra Darathy
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Surendra Darathy » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:11 pm

SpeedOfSound wrote:Now who's complaining? Christ, I just want to know about treeness.
It's an anagram of "sneer set".
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by jamest » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:12 pm

SpeedOfSound wrote:Now who's complaining? Christ, I just want to know about treeness.
Yeah, don't you know how fugin annoying that is? :biggrin:

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by maiforpeace » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:16 pm

I am assisting in this matter. I just want to reiterate what was posted before, only with some edits:


Everyone: You are being far too personal in your posts. The constant "he said - she said" between you is irrelevant to the topic and boring to everyone else. Will you please knock it on the head now. Some of you are not playing nice.

The rules of this forum don't include 'official warnings'. Board warnings are only given as a joke for trivial acts of supreme inanity. What we do issue is reminders to play nice, which you have already received, which eventually include a warning that any further such behaviour will result in a brief suspension, so that you will have time to consider whether you really do understand the Play Nice rule. This post is that warning. The next time anyone posts a continuation of your childish arguments, that person will be sent for a vacation. And one word in retaliation from the other will mean the same for them.

Now can everyone please try to limit themselves to the topic. Enjoy your philosophising.


The thread will now be temporarily locked for a cool down period.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:41 pm

Just to back up what Mai has said, we ask you to "play nice" if you post here. If you can't figure out what "play nice" means, you will probably fail to do so. Keep that in mind if/when we reopen this thread.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Metaphysics as an Error

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:41 pm

There is not a lot of point in reopening this thread, as it is close to the 1000 post limit. If someone would like to continue this conversation in a new thread, please feel free to start one. :tup:

However, try and keep things a little more civil than they have been in this one. First person to call anyone else a troll or a fuckwit gets a holiday. If you think that someone is trolling, tell the staff.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests