Even more problematic stuff

[Cunt]

Nobody is qualified to limit speech, what they are is strong and violent enough to limit speech. The reality is all law, at it's base, is predicated on naked force by the collective against the individual.

Finally someone who makes sense.

I don't think anyone is qualified to choose for me. Except chick flicks. My sweetheart is good at that. Fed me 'Cold Mountain' the other day.

Holy fuck dude.

When will people start sneering at the Trump Russia Collusion nonsense as the conspiracy theory that it is?

There really isn't any more evidence for it than there was for Roswell or Lizard Overlords.

when they have better evidence that frump is not actually working for the poutine, and that the sauce fries have no hold on him whatever... he and his team do seem to have had a lot of suspicious doings with the russkies since prior and during the campaign.

I'll leave it with Area 51, Roswell, the JFK assasination cover-up, the 9/11 inside job and anything else which doesn't possess convincing evidnece.

It has another element of 'conspiracy theory'. That is that no-one will ever let it go. Just ask yourself what would convince you that Trump wasn't guilty of...

Wait - what does the conspiracy claim that he is guilty of, exactly?

[pErvinalia]

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 4#p1810072

[Cunt]

These look like Social Justice Warriors.



Maybe they are.

One paper, published in a journal called Sex Roles, said that the author had conducted a two-year study involving “thematic analysis of table dialogue” to uncover the mystery of why heterosexual men like to eat at Hooters.

Another, from a journal of feminist geography, parsed “human reactions to rape culture and queer performativity” at dog parks in Portland, Ore., while a third paper, published in a journal of feminist social work and titled “Our Struggle Is My Struggle,” simply scattered some up-to-date jargon into passages lifted from Hitler’s “Mein Kampf.”

Such offerings may or may not have raised eyebrows among the journals’ limited readerships. But this week, they unleashed a cascade of mockery — along with a torrent of debate about ethics of hoaxes, the state of peer review and the excesses of academia — when they were revealed to be part of an elaborate prank aimed squarely at what the authors labeled “grievance studies.”

[Cunt]

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 4#p1810072

Imagine my not being convinced by that...hmm....must be that I am waiting to see if he gets impeached tomorrow, or if this is more whispers about conspiracy, and ANY time now, ANY time.

[pErvinalia]

Surely you must agree that an investigation into him and his campaign is warranted. There's a hell of a lot of smoke.

[Svartalf]

there is no fire, it's just a meteorite burning up in the atmosphere, or maybe a volcano erupting...


uh, what?

[Cunt]

Surely you must agree that an investigation into him and his campaign is warranted. There's a hell of a lot of smoke.

What is it he is accused of? Maybe start there.

Why was an investigation started?

While you get your conspiracy theory links, consider what evidence would change your mind about Trump. (hint - to change your mind, you would have to define a position firmly enough that it may be falsified)

[pErvinalia]

I can only assume you are trolling. He's very clearly been accused of collusion. And the investigations were clearly started for the reasons given in L'Emmy's link. What evidence of his innocence would I accept? A verdict of no collusion when the various investigations conclude.

[Cunt]

I can only assume you are trolling. He's very clearly been accused of collusion. And the investigations were clearly started for the reasons given in L'Emmy's link. What evidence of his innocence would I accept? A verdict of no collusion when the various investigations conclude.

Which crime is 'collusion'?

[Cunt]

Eugene once showed me that he could open a wine bottle without a cork. There are several, mechanically interesting and subtle methods.

Eugene pushed it in with his little finger.

So am I colluding? Is it unlawful? Or only if I'm president, or about to be?

[pErvinalia]

What in the fuck are you on about?

[rainbow]

I can only assume you are trolling. He's very clearly been accused of collusion. And the investigations were clearly started for the reasons given in L'Emmy's link. What evidence of his innocence would I accept? A verdict of no collusion when the various investigations conclude.

Which crime is 'collusion'?

Treason.

Any act that involves the assistance of a foreign power in undermining the state might fit this charge.

Do you disagree?

[Forty Two]

2020 Ford Shelby Mustang GT500 - 5.2L V-8 with 700 horses.

Quite Problematic.

[Forty Two]

I can only assume you are trolling. He's very clearly been accused of collusion. And the investigations were clearly started for the reasons given in L'Emmy's link. What evidence of his innocence would I accept? A verdict of no collusion when the various investigations conclude.

Which crime is 'collusion'?

Treason.

Any act that involves the assistance of a foreign power in undermining the state might fit this charge.

Do you disagree?

“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." Article III, US Constitution. So, that's what it means in the US.

But, under your definition, what evidence is there that Trump undermined the State with assistance from a foreign power?

[rainbow]

2020 Ford Shelby Mustang GT500 - 5.2L V-8 with 700 horses.

Quite Problematic.

All arse, no class.

This is a proper car: