Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenuity.

Post Reply
User avatar
Azathoth
blind idiot god
blind idiot god
Posts: 9418
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Azathoth » Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:59 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Addition is commutative over all number systems yet devised; ie. a + b = b + a. Good luck finding a counter-example - just one would bring the whole house of cards tumbling and have mathematicians running around for years trying to revise their entire science. :tea:
ordinal numbers :coffee:
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.

Code: Select all

// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis 
   $str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:47 am

Azathoth wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Addition is commutative over all number systems yet devised; ie. a + b = b + a. Good luck finding a counter-example - just one would bring the whole house of cards tumbling and have mathematicians running around for years trying to revise their entire science. :tea:
ordinal numbers :coffee:
Well played. :clap:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
MiM
Man In The Middle
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by MiM » Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:27 am

rEvolutionist wrote:All you are really saying there is that numbers are real. But as I said earlier, maths is about much more than just numbers.
Well, I started from the simplest case I could imagine, to establish a concept that I believe can be expanded. If we lived in a space so warped, that our everyday triangles would not obey Pythagoras theorem (as explained by Xamonas above), if we could not in fact draw and measure triangles where the theorem applies, then we would not have Pythagoras theorem in it's present form. Or maybe it would exist, but it would would be an obscurity and not hold the very central position it has now.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Robert_S » Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:27 am

MiM wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:All you are really saying there is that numbers are real. But as I said earlier, maths is about much more than just numbers.
Well, I started from the simplest case I could imagine, to establish a concept that I believe can be expanded. If we lived in a space so warped, that our everyday triangles would not obey Pythagoras theorem (as explained by Xamonas above), if we could not in fact draw and measure triangles where the theorem applies, then we would not have Pythagoras theorem in it's present form. Or maybe it would exist, but it would would be an obscurity and not hold the very central position it has now.
It's close enough to do some very precise work with and in that sense it is a truth about the world we live in, but not an Absolute Truth about the physical world. In the majority of cases, it doesn't matter, but I think it is something to keep in mind. To keep us humble about what we think we know.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by FBM » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:00 am

Since we're talking countability, is discreteness a fundamental feature of anything in existence, or is it projection of how the brain/mind evolved to effectively analyze experience?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:11 am

The universe is a field. At every point in the field there is a different ratio of the same handful of elements. Some of the points in the field believe they are me but that is just wishful thinking.

What do I know? I still count up to 13 on my toes.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:25 am

I'm glad I brought this up. I'll make some responses after I've had a piss.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by FBM » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:35 am

10 minutes and counting. Helluva piss. :?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:38 am

If something was exactly one Planck Length long, would it not have to be straight?
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Svartalf » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:53 am

FBM wrote:10 minutes and counting. Helluva piss. :?
He's taking a piss as in getting drunk, not evacuating the liquid.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:55 am

He's taking the piss all right.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:05 am

FBM wrote:10 minutes and counting. Helluva piss. :?
:hehe:


Okay.

@Robert S

You may be unsurprised to know I know about Indra's net. It's a great concept. However you seem to be saying that even if it is a map, it is only a map of our internal processes, in so far as we are mapping perceptual data along with inference and bias which are products not of external reality but our consciousness. That such "truths" as the theorem are objective as a function of our minds rather than external physical reality. That the platonic forms are archetypes, products of neurology

Is that about it?

(We should get into a convo about mysticism sometime, perhaps this is going there anyway, we shall see.)


@MiM

You seem to be taking the opposite view in which the symbols and functions that we have discovered are axiomatic at a fundamental level. 1+1=2 even without a consciousness to know it does. In some way then they are objectively as real as a mountain, even more so because they exist in some form which is eternal, grandfathered in to the very material itself.

Would that be fair to say?

@ Straight Lines in nature.

It's a digression. Mathematics does not deal with nature as I already pointed out.It deals with the mean, the average and the ratio. It deals with platonic forms, the perfect circle, square, the cube. These mathematical concepts are describing something with form and function. Is there or was there a dimension where perfected platonic forms exist, even if only for a nanosecond at the start of the universe, an objectively perfected state that is like a wire frame over which matter and entropy has it's way?

Or is it that we are developing better control over nothing but our perceptual abilities?

On the face of it it seems like a case for "soplipsism or God" but nothing so simple would be anywhere near an answer, I think. Not that I know.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:17 am

Mathematics does not deal with nature? Hmmmm. Fibonacci sequence in sunflowers, fractal geometry of coastlines. Mathematics is natures operating system.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:19 am

Azathoth wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Addition is commutative over all number systems yet devised; ie. a + b = b + a. Good luck finding a counter-example - just one would bring the whole house of cards tumbling and have mathematicians running around for years trying to revise their entire science. :tea:
ordinal numbers :coffee:
Which I just wiki'ed

:shock:

That's just wild.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Pythagoras' Theorem. Evidence of elsewhere or our ingenu

Post by FBM » Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:20 am

Audley, what about the discreteness-countability issue I mentioned?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests