klr wrote:Ahem ... see above.Mama Bear wrote:Oh, happy day.![]()
Not that it matters in this context, but I think the Gallstones is female.

klr wrote:Ahem ... see above.Mama Bear wrote:Oh, happy day.![]()
Not that it matters in this context, but I think the Gallstones is female.
Gallstones IS A GIRL?Charlou wrote:Oh, happy day.![]()
Not that it matters in this context, but I think the Gallstones is female.
lordpasternack wrote:Oh - I see. Permanent PMS, then...
Redwhine as a mod. Now that's just scary. He trolls regularly, making no relevant or coherent responses to things elsewhere in the thread. I think there was one about smoking that I was posting in. He was just blathering on and on instead of actually READING what people wrone and composing a logical reply.lordpasternack wrote:I'm going to say it aloud. I was genuinely completely and utterly shocked at Gallstones being appointed as a mod. He has in some ways cooled his jets a little as I've seen it, from my own vantage point, now that he's a mod - but he is fully expert at being sardonic, vicious, curmudgeonly, dogmatic and a little more besides. He had been one of the members on my "unpleasant" list for quite some months - so when I saw him in blue, I was aghast.Manofnofaith wrote:Me and Matt H. had a little fight in the prison reforms thread-I forget the exact title. Gallstones removed all the comments by both of us relating to that argument(Matt was being a deuchebag, and I called him on it). I thought that was a little disturbing. It should have been left there as an educational lesson. Gallstones has demonstrated similar behavior on other occasions as well, locking threads and then editing them into a tidy new conversation that never happened. Seems a little Orwellian to me.
I've had no inkling of him being able to see different sides of an argument, or of even being diplomatic, ever. Maybe that's just my limited experience of him - but in any case - he isn't exactly a model candidate.
At this rate, I'm worried that they might approach Redwhine about a modship...
Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.lordpasternack wrote:Well that's what it's all about! Those best in "power" are those that don't dwell on that position at all - and particularly those who have no particular desire to be in that particular "status". It's almost a Catch-22 - but you've definitely managed to toe that line.Pappa wrote:I've really done my best to not be at the helm of this place. I don't want to make the same mistake that happened on TAF.Mary Mary Quite Contrary wrote:And I'm glad we have such a down-to-earth and level-headed chap at the helm.
Now try very, very hard not to let all the adulations go to your head.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.lordpasternack wrote:Well that's what it's all about! Those best in "power" are those that don't dwell on that position at all - and particularly those who have no particular desire to be in that particular "status". It's almost a Catch-22 - but you've definitely managed to toe that line.Pappa wrote:I've really done my best to not be at the helm of this place. I don't want to make the same mistake that happened on TAF.Mary Mary Quite Contrary wrote:And I'm glad we have such a down-to-earth and level-headed chap at the helm.
Now try very, very hard not to let all the adulations go to your head.
But at least I'm honest about it.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.lordpasternack wrote:Well that's what it's all about! Those best in "power" are those that don't dwell on that position at all - and particularly those who have no particular desire to be in that particular "status". It's almost a Catch-22 - but you've definitely managed to toe that line.Pappa wrote:I've really done my best to not be at the helm of this place. I don't want to make the same mistake that happened on TAF.Mary Mary Quite Contrary wrote:And I'm glad we have such a down-to-earth and level-headed chap at the helm.
Now try very, very hard not to let all the adulations go to your head.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
I don't think it's that deep down. I'm thinking it's more like just under the surface.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.lordpasternack wrote:Well that's what it's all about! Those best in "power" are those that don't dwell on that position at all - and particularly those who have no particular desire to be in that particular "status". It's almost a Catch-22 - but you've definitely managed to toe that line.Pappa wrote:I've really done my best to not be at the helm of this place. I don't want to make the same mistake that happened on TAF.Mary Mary Quite Contrary wrote:And I'm glad we have such a down-to-earth and level-headed chap at the helm.
Now try very, very hard not to let all the adulations go to your head.
I've often noticed it hanging right out there in the open, actually.FIO wrote:I don't think it's that deep down. I'm thinking it's more like just under the surface.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.
And not to mention painted on the front of his house in blood-red letters three feet high.Charlou wrote:I've often noticed it hanging right out there in the open, actually.FIO wrote:I don't think it's that deep down. I'm thinking it's more like just under the surface.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.
Those letters say "Go stick your head in a pig".Xamonas Chegwé wrote:And not to mention painted on the front of his house in blood-red letters three feet high.Charlou wrote:I've often noticed it hanging right out there in the open, actually.FIO wrote:I don't think it's that deep down. I'm thinking it's more like just under the surface.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:And not to mention painted on the front of his house in blood-red letters three feet high.Charlou wrote:I've often noticed it hanging right out there in the open, actually.FIO wrote:I don't think it's that deep down. I'm thinking it's more like just under the surface.Pappa wrote:That's because, deep down (and on the surface) you're a power hungry warmongering dictator-in-waiting.DP wrote:Power corrupts and absolute power would be kinda neat actually.
Oops - fucking online gaelic translators!!DP wrote:Those letters say "Go stick your head in a pig".
Now to work out what Pappa's Welsh nonsense says.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Oops - fucking online gaelic translators!!DP wrote:Those letters say "Go stick your head in a pig".![]()
![]()
lordpasternack wrote:At this rate, I'm worried that they might approach Redwhine about a modship...
lordpasternack wrote:I'll just leave this old quote of mine here:
lordpasternack wrote:At this rate, I'm worried that they might approach Redwhine about a modship...
lordpasternack wrote:I'll just leave this old quote of mine here:
lordpasternack wrote:At this rate, I'm worried that they might approach Redwhine about a modship...
It really is farcical. The only talents of his that I've seen are snideness, sycophancy, and a penchant for trying to ruin threads that would otherwise be productive with plenty of snide sycophancy that doesn't change as his arguments get knocked down. He's a real one-trick pony when it comes to arguing, and that trick is most certainly not grounded in logic. And he doesn't even do it with any level of wit either. I'm sure he is of some use to the staff with regards to standing there to piss off anyone who tries to complain, on the staff's behalf - even if he does it in a rather sub-intelligent manner - but is that really grounds for modship, I mean, really?klr wrote:lordpasternack wrote:I'll just leave this old quote of mine here:
lordpasternack wrote:At this rate, I'm worried that they might approach Redwhine about a modship...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For some reason, I found this thread just now, and I was mulling over whether or not to bump your comment about Redwhine ... oh mercy!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests