Women on top

[Rum]

You are trying to prove that men are better than women in other words. Again - what on earth for?

A bit obsessive and a irrelevant.

[JimC]

For Cunt, the appropriate slogan would seem to be "Males Uber Alles!"

Keep 'em barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen and without a vote eh Cunt...

However, the bus has left, and the few remaining troglodytes have to grin and bear it...

[Brian Peacock]

Our male perspectives are always going to be more relevant to our experiences as men than a female perspective, so why wouldn't we question the status and competence of women by the same standards that our own manly status and competences are assessed?

[Cunt]

You are trying to prove that men are better than women in other words. Again - what on earth for?

A bit obsessive and a irrelevant.

I was trying to find evidence that women were better than men in some way. Any measurable, clear way. Sport would be an easy place to show it.

For Cunt, the appropriate slogan would seem to be "Males Uber Alles!"

Keep 'em barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen and without a vote eh Cunt...

However, the bus has left, and the few remaining troglodytes have to grin and bear it...

Awful, JimC, really.

Why do you assume I want women treated that way? Because I ask for examples of their excellence?

I'm kind of surprised that none of you can find one, but not at all surprised that asking turns into a perfect excuse to insult me.

Coincidentally, it looks exactly like it would if you were virtue-signalling to the dominant political group.

Our male perspectives are always going to be more relevant to our experiences as men than a female perspective, so why wouldn't we question the status and competence of women by the same standards that our own manly status and competences are assessed?

If you make it sound like I'm the jerk for simply asking this kind of question, is the news item that I am a jerk? Or that you still have no answer?

In a lot of jobs, being competitive or skilled really doesn't matter, so mostly this kind of question isn't really needed, right? I should just accept that even those crossing the finish line last, are winners. Heck, even the ones on the couch are winners.

You guys sure won this discussion, with all (0) of your winning examples.

[JimC]

What's the whole obsession with "winners" about?

Sounds like a bad case of Social Darwinism to me...

[pErvinalia]

Somebody left the door open and the Conservatives have taken over!

I crushed this thread early. Cunt's like a chicken runnin' round without its head.

Now he's firing everyone just cos he doesn't like how they look!

I'ts a good strategy, as it allows one rule to cover many situations. You don't need two rules to handle the fact that you don't like both women and fat people, for example!

[pErvinalia]

Somebody left the door open and the Conservatives have taken over!

I crushed this thread early. Cunt's like a chicken runnin' round without its head.

You mean where you posted examples of sports where women consistently outperform men in fair competition?

I must have missed it in your exceptional examples of women who occasionally excelled...

So far, I have not one single example of a sport where women can show their greater strengths against men.

It's almost like you guys don't have such an example to offer...

It's because we don't care, and don't want to validate your exercise in bigotry.

[Cunt]

It's because we don't care, and don't want to validate your exercise in bigotry.

Virtue-signalling? Or backpedaling to avoid admitting failure to provide a single example?

Hard to tell from here, but GREAT job almost staying on topic! I'm so proud of your efforts here. I really couldn't expect any better from you! This might just be your greatest post yet!

[pErvinalia]

Again, we (well at least I) don't care if women do or don't dominate men in one or many areas. The vast majority of jobs use technology that largely eliminates any differences (both ways) that might exist. As I said earlier, it appears that only bigots care about these sorts of things, as it is an attempt to validate their own preconceived views.

[Joe]

Why is this thread is still going? Rachel answered the question a few days ago.

[laklak]

Have we talked about Reverse Cowgirl yet?

[Joe]

Yippee ki yay!

[Cunt]

Again, we (well at least I) don't care if women do or don't dominate men in one or many areas. The vast majority of jobs use technology that largely eliminates any differences (both ways) that might exist. As I said earlier, it appears that only bigots care about these sorts of things, as it is an attempt to validate their own preconceived views.

The skills on display in sport have no relevance to any employment activity. OK.

But why keep the conversation over there, instead of simply providing an example of women on top?

Unless they are SO hard to find, you have to switch to insults and changing the subject...

But you wouldn't do that, would you? I mean, you have been doing so well with your spelling, and your regular postings. Heck, I'm impressed with how close you stay to the subject. You must have been taking classes or something. Good job!

[JimC]

Again, we (well at least I) don't care if women do or don't dominate men in one or many areas. The vast majority of jobs use technology that largely eliminates any differences (both ways) that might exist. As I said earlier, it appears that only bigots care about these sorts of things, as it is an attempt to validate their own preconceived views.

The skills on display in sport have no relevance to any employment activity. OK.

But why keep the conversation over there, instead of simply providing an example of women on top?

Unless they are SO hard to find, you have to switch to insults and changing the subject...

But you wouldn't do that, would you? I mean, you have been doing so well with your spelling, and your regular postings. Heck, I'm impressed with how close you stay to the subject. You must have been taking classes or something. Good job!

Why the fuck should we answer your idiotic quest for examples, when time and time again we've demonstrated that your quest for competitive differences between male and female is utterly fucking irrelevant?

[pErvinalia]

Again, we (well at least I) don't care if women do or don't dominate men in one or many areas. The vast majority of jobs use technology that largely eliminates any differences (both ways) that might exist. As I said earlier, it appears that only bigots care about these sorts of things, as it is an attempt to validate their own preconceived views.

The skills on display in sport have no relevance to any employment activity. OK.

But why keep the conversation over there, instead of simply providing an example of women on top?

Can you not read? I've mentioned at least three times now that I don't care to validate your exercise in bigotry.

Unless they are SO hard to find, you have to switch to insults and changing the subject...

Stop with the faux outrage. You are happy to throw around insults when it suits you. Regarding whether they are hard to find or not, again, I don't care. I wouldn't care in the slightest if it was found that women weren't dominant in a single area. It's irrelevant.

But you wouldn't do that, would you? I mean, you have been doing so well with your spelling, and your regular postings. Heck, I'm impressed with how close you stay to the subject. You must have been taking classes or something. Good job!

Here it is.. "Spelling" (at least 4 times now) is the new OCD/Tourettes obsession. Let's keep count!