I thought it was an aspect of Canadianness to nearly constantly experience social awkwardness...FBM wrote:Fucking Canadians. They should all experience an evening of social awkwardness!!
Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Alright, you got me there. But still...they send their bears down to the US to take jobs from 'Murkun bears!!!Coito ergo sum wrote:I thought it was an aspect of Canadianness to nearly constantly experience social awkwardness...FBM wrote:Fucking Canadians. They should all experience an evening of social awkwardness!!
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
I heard the Canadians had massed 80% of their population right along the US-Canada border. I think it's a sure sign of an impending invasion.FBM wrote:Alright, you got me there. But still...they send their bears down to the US to take jobs from 'Murkun bears!!!Coito ergo sum wrote:I thought it was an aspect of Canadianness to nearly constantly experience social awkwardness...FBM wrote:Fucking Canadians. They should all experience an evening of social awkwardness!!
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
No doubt whatsoever in my mind. Sneaky, polite bastids. That's why I moved to Korea, where you know who the enemy is. Well, sometimes, anyway. But is is harder to find Canadian bacon over here, tho.Coito ergo sum wrote:I heard the Canadians had massed 80% of their population right along the US-Canada border. I think it's a sure sign of an impending invasion.FBM wrote:Alright, you got me there. But still...they send their bears down to the US to take jobs from 'Murkun bears!!!Coito ergo sum wrote:I thought it was an aspect of Canadianness to nearly constantly experience social awkwardness...FBM wrote:Fucking Canadians. They should all experience an evening of social awkwardness!!
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
At least the Canadians don't send their trolls down here.
Oh, wait...
Oh, wait...
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Blah blah fucking blah ... so it may or may not be in the right thread ...FBM wrote:That's clearly a strawman argument to the OP, innit? The OP had to do with racism, not religion or blasphemy. I don't think "Insulting the friends of..." is hate speech. "All fucking niggers must fucking hang" would be an example of hate speech.Coito ergo sum wrote:Lessons from a country that doesn't tolerate hate speech.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/ ... t-JErK5PjxSaudi Arabia to Give Australian 500 Lashes, Jail for Blasphemy
Insulting the friends of the founder of Islam earned an Australian national 500 lashes and a year in jail in Saudi Arabia last month.
Stop the hate! The Saudis, putting up the good fight!
Is this story for real? I hadn't heard anything about it until reading it just now.
A man is facing 500 fucking lashes? And I'm reading you guys arguing over ... I dunno, what are you arguing over ... ? So surreal.
Five Hundred Fucking Lashes.
Sickening.
no fences
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Hey, that's lenient for the 8th century.
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Yes, the story is real. I think it's on the right thread.charlou wrote:Blah blah fucking blah ... so it may or may not be in the right thread ...FBM wrote:That's clearly a strawman argument to the OP, innit? The OP had to do with racism, not religion or blasphemy. I don't think "Insulting the friends of..." is hate speech. "All fucking niggers must fucking hang" would be an example of hate speech.Coito ergo sum wrote:Lessons from a country that doesn't tolerate hate speech.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/ ... t-JErK5PjxSaudi Arabia to Give Australian 500 Lashes, Jail for Blasphemy
Insulting the friends of the founder of Islam earned an Australian national 500 lashes and a year in jail in Saudi Arabia last month.
Stop the hate! The Saudis, putting up the good fight!
Is this story for real? I hadn't heard anything about it until reading it just now.
A man is facing 500 fucking lashes? And I'm reading you guys arguing over ... I dunno, what are you arguing over ... ? So surreal.
Five Hundred Fucking Lashes.
Sickening.
I mocked Saudi Arabia for this. I think it is emblematic of why we don't want to allow the government to be the arbiter of what speech is illegal and what isn't. The loonies take control and start whipping people for insults.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
No, it's not news that the Saudis are hard line about this. That's why I posted it here, as evidence of why rules against "hate speech" are stupid, whether in civil life or on a forum message board. Whether something is hate speech starts to depend on who is in control.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
And, Saudi Arabia is not a house, it's a country, and the people in Saudi Arabia have as much a right to individual liberty as we do here in the US. They are simply being denied it by their civil authorities.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Yeah! And the Klan ain't nuthing but good ole' boys. So if you darkies don't like it, get the fuck out of Indiana.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
That's different, this is the US, and the Klan doesn't get to engage in illegal activities here.Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah! And the Klan ain't nuthing but good ole' boys. So if you darkies don't like it, get the fuck out of Indiana.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
But the law in Saudi Arabia is pretty clear. It's their shithole of a country, and they have a right to enforce their laws, even against arrogant foreigners. They may be shitheads for doing so, but if you visit a shithead country, you rub shit on your head or you get out.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
The government doesn't have rights.Seth wrote:That's different, this is the US, and the Klan doesn't get to engage in illegal activities here.Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah! And the Klan ain't nuthing but good ole' boys. So if you darkies don't like it, get the fuck out of Indiana.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
But the law in Saudi Arabia is pretty clear. It's their shithole of a country, and they have a right to enforce their laws, even against arrogant foreigners. They may be shitheads for doing so, but if you visit a shithead country, you rub shit on your head or you get out.
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
It does in Saudi Arabia, and indeed most of the rest of the world, including the UN. Only in America (so far as I know) is the government by, of, and for the People and has NO rights, but only delegated powers and authorities from the People, any or all of which may be revoked by the will of the People.Coito ergo sum wrote:The government doesn't have rights.Seth wrote:That's different, this is the US, and the Klan doesn't get to engage in illegal activities here.Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah! And the Klan ain't nuthing but good ole' boys. So if you darkies don't like it, get the fuck out of Indiana.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
But the law in Saudi Arabia is pretty clear. It's their shithole of a country, and they have a right to enforce their laws, even against arrogant foreigners. They may be shitheads for doing so, but if you visit a shithead country, you rub shit on your head or you get out.
That's one of the fundamental differences between the US and every other nation. Elsewhere, the people (little "p") are the subjects and vassals of the government. Here, the People are the masters, and the government their servant.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
So, if it's "legal", nothing should be done about it?Seth wrote:That's different, this is the US, and the Klan doesn't get to engage in illegal activities here.Gawdzilla wrote:Yeah! And the Klan ain't nuthing but good ole' boys. So if you darkies don't like it, get the fuck out of Indiana.Seth wrote:Sounds like a good reason to avoid going to Saudi Arabia...or learn to be polite and STFU about religion when you're in someone else's home.
It's not like it's news that the Saudis are hard-line Muslims who don't tolerate criticism of Islam, now is it?
But the law in Saudi Arabia is pretty clear. It's their shithole of a country, and they have a right to enforce their laws, even against arrogant foreigners. They may be shitheads for doing so, but if you visit a shithead country, you rub shit on your head or you get out.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
