Moral Crimes ??

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Atheist-Lite » Thu May 24, 2012 2:30 pm

Tyrannical wrote:Anyone want to define "moral"?

I generally use God as the standard, what God loves is moral, and what God abhors is immoral.
God is dead. Have you heard him say anything lively lately? :fp:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39937
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu May 24, 2012 4:29 pm

Tyrannical wrote:Anyone want to define "moral"?

I generally use God as the standard, what God loves is moral, and what God abhors is immoral.
I think Crumpy means moral in the general sense of good stuff. If good stuff is always and only whatever god loves than if god loves lying lying is good stuff. However, most reasonable people don't see lying as good stuff. If god changes his mind then what was good stuff yesterday might not be good stuff tomorrow, e.g. a god-sanctioned random killing of six year old boys might be good stuff today and bad stuff tomorrow, where most reasonable people would simply not accept that bad stuff is good just because god is reported to love it. And besides, if we're going to address what is or isn't, or what might or might not be, moral about actions but which are considered criminal in law then this can only be done on a case by case basis and so we have no need of definitive list of god-authorised loving acts - and we can apply the same reasoning to God's law and religious strictures as we can to criminal law. God can sit this one out, as usual.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 24, 2012 4:41 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:Anyone want to define "moral"?

I generally use God as the standard, what God loves is moral, and what God abhors is immoral.
I think Crumpy means moral in the general sense of good stuff. If good stuff is always and only whatever god loves than if god loves lying lying is good stuff. However, most reasonable people don't see lying as good stuff. If god changes his mind then what was good stuff yesterday might not be good stuff tomorrow, e.g. a god-sanctioned random killing of six year old boys might be good stuff today and bad stuff tomorrow, where most reasonable people would simply not accept that bad stuff is good just because god is reported to love it. And besides, if we're going to address what is or isn't, or what might or might not be, moral about actions but which are considered criminal in law then this can only be done on a case by case basis and so we have no need of definitive list of god-authorised loving acts - and we can apply the same reasoning to God's law and religious strictures as we can to criminal law. God can sit this one out, as usual.
I don't remember God decreeing randomly killing six year olds :ask:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Hermit » Thu May 24, 2012 4:45 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:Anyone want to define "moral"?

I generally use God as the standard, what God loves is moral, and what God abhors is immoral.
I think Crumpy means moral in the general sense of good stuff. If good stuff is always and only whatever god loves than if god loves lying lying is good stuff. However, most reasonable people don't see lying as good stuff. If god changes his mind then what was good stuff yesterday might not be good stuff tomorrow, e.g. a god-sanctioned random killing of six year old boys might be good stuff today and bad stuff tomorrow, where most reasonable people would simply not accept that bad stuff is good just because god is reported to love it. And besides, if we're going to address what is or isn't, or what might or might not be, moral about actions but which are considered criminal in law then this can only be done on a case by case basis and so we have no need of definitive list of god-authorised loving acts - and we can apply the same reasoning to God's law and religious strictures as we can to criminal law. God can sit this one out, as usual.
Besides that, the morals of which God? The God of the old testament? The God of the new? Allah? Kali? Your own household god?

Mh, I think Tranny is pulling our legs.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 24, 2012 4:49 pm

:evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Hermit » Thu May 24, 2012 4:57 pm

Tyrannical wrote::evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
Think of it as poetic licence.

Anyway, which god do you have in mind, and why?
Last edited by Hermit on Thu May 24, 2012 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Svartalf » Thu May 24, 2012 4:58 pm

Tyrannical wrote::evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
Looks like your ankles are so swollen you can go through doors only sideways... which is Ironic since Tyr's name is prounounced the same as the german word for a door (leading me to wonder if he was a god of doorways as well as war, as well as the former leader of the Aesir, before the Sorcerer King's worshippers won out)
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 24, 2012 5:29 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Tyrannical wrote::evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
Looks like your ankles are so swollen you can go through doors only sideways... which is Ironic since Tyr's name is prounounced the same as the german word for a door (leading me to wonder if he was a god of doorways as well as war, as well as the former leader of the Aesir, before the Sorcerer King's worshippers won out)
:evil:
The ironic abbreviation Tyr is the Norse god who put his hand in Feneris mouth to shackle him. Tyrannical is of course from the Greek tyrannos, which represented the middle-class taking power from the unjust nobility.
Tranny is just an insult.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Hermit » Thu May 24, 2012 5:52 pm

Tyrannical wrote:Tranny is just an insult.
Depends. Triodes in the form of vacuum tubes were around since 1907. They were bulky, consumed a lot of power, but very useful in the electronics industry, particularly so in radios. By the sixties they had evolved into solid-state devices called transistors - a contraction of the term 'transfer resistor'. These things were so cheap, tiny, economic and robust that it became possible to mass produce quite small radios that ran on a set of batteries for hours and could easily be taken to picnics, parties or wherever. Every juvenile seemed to have one, but nobody could be bothered to say "I'll bring my transistor radio along then" or "I need new batteries for my transistor radio." "Transistor radio" was contracted to "tranny." Your bleatings remind me of the sort of stuff I heard in the sixties over the tranny. So, as I said, Tranny, think of it as poetic license.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Svartalf » Thu May 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Tyrannical wrote::evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
Looks like your ankles are so swollen you can go through doors only sideways... which is Ironic since Tyr's name is prounounced the same as the german word for a door (leading me to wonder if he was a god of doorways as well as war, as well as the former leader of the Aesir, before the Sorcerer King's worshippers won out)
:evil:
The ironic abbreviation Tyr is the Norse god who put his hand in Feneris mouth to shackle him. Tyrannical is of course from the Greek tyrannos, which represented the middle-class taking power from the unjust nobility.
Tranny is just an insult.
Begging pardon, but with the notable exception of Peisistratos of Athens, most recorded tyrants precisely earned the name its current (since antiquity) connotations. Better be ruled by Pericles or Themistocles or Leonidas than by the 30 tyrants or Dionysos of Syracusae.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 24, 2012 6:15 pm

Hermit wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:Tranny is just an insult.
Depends. Triodes in the form of vacuum tubes were around since 1907. They were bulky, consumed a lot of power, but very useful in the electronics industry, particularly so in radios. By the sixties they had evolved into solid-state devices called transistors - a contraction of the term 'transfer resistor'. These things were so cheap, tiny, economic and robust that it became possible to mass produce quite small radios that ran on a set of batteries for hours and could easily be taken to picnics, parties or wherever. Every juvenile seemed to have one, but nobody could be bothered to say "I'll bring my transistor radio along then" or "I need new batteries for my transistor radio." "Transistor radio" was contracted to "tranny." Your bleatings remind me of the sort of stuff I heard in the sixties over the tranny. So, as I said, Tranny, think of it as poetic license.
After I explicitly mention that I don't appreciate being called that, you continue to do so. Are you really going to force me to report your actions to a moderator or will you just agree to behave yourself?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Rum » Thu May 24, 2012 6:20 pm

This thread is criminal. :coffee:

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Svartalf » Thu May 24, 2012 6:22 pm

Where's little Red Riding Hood?
Because I feel like robbing Hood
of her virtue
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Hermit » Thu May 24, 2012 6:25 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
Hermit wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:Tranny is just an insult.
Depends. Triodes in the form of vacuum tubes were around since 1907. They were bulky, consumed a lot of power, but very useful in the electronics industry, particularly so in radios. By the sixties they had evolved into solid-state devices called transistors - a contraction of the term 'transfer resistor'. These things were so cheap, tiny, economic and robust that it became possible to mass produce quite small radios that ran on a set of batteries for hours and could easily be taken to picnics, parties or wherever. Every juvenile seemed to have one, but nobody could be bothered to say "I'll bring my transistor radio along then" or "I need new batteries for my transistor radio." "Transistor radio" was contracted to "tranny." Your bleatings remind me of the sort of stuff I heard in the sixties over the tranny. So, as I said, Tranny, think of it as poetic license.
After I explicitly mention that I don't appreciate being called that, you continue to do so. Are you really going to force me to report your actions to a moderator or will you just agree to behave yourself?
Look, I can't be arsed typing out "transistor radio" every time I'm referring to you. The contraction to "Tranny" will just have to do, and it's not really all that insulting for that reason, Tranny.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Moral Crimes ??

Post by Tyrannical » Thu May 24, 2012 6:29 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Tyrannical wrote::evil: Tranny is NOT a proper abbreviation of my name. Tyr is the ironic though acceptable alternative.
Looks like your ankles are so swollen you can go through doors only sideways... which is Ironic since Tyr's name is prounounced the same as the german word for a door (leading me to wonder if he was a god of doorways as well as war, as well as the former leader of the Aesir, before the Sorcerer King's worshippers won out)
:evil:
The ironic abbreviation Tyr is the Norse god who put his hand in Feneris mouth to shackle him. Tyrannical is of course from the Greek tyrannos, which represented the middle-class taking power from the unjust nobility.
Tranny is just an insult.
Begging pardon, but with the notable exception of Peisistratos of Athens, most recorded tyrants precisely earned the name its current (since antiquity) connotations. Better be ruled by Pericles or Themistocles or Leonidas than by the 30 tyrants or Dionysos of Syracusae.
Tyrannies were simply an early experiment with Republicanism, and it should not be surprising that the monarchies would have disapproved and maligned the title of Tyrant.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests