Jungs Archetypes? Are They Enough?

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: Jungs Archetypes? Are They Enough?

Post by Atheist-Lite » Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:46 am

Jung had is year casting sticks following the I Ching for advice and Freud spent quite a while pushing his numerology. I prefer Jung because he wasn't innumerate I suppose? :funny:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
hiyymer
Posts: 425
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:18 am

Re: Jungs Archetypes? Are They Enough?

Post by hiyymer » Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:45 pm

Crumple wrote: Being totally wrong is better than being half right were I come from. :science:
There's the story about the stock analyst on Wall Street who was always wrong, and the other one who was right half the time. Which one is more valuable to an investor?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests