She may be. However, to say that her lying is unsubstantiated is total horseshit. You obviously did not read the article to which I linked. It's not even debatable.piscator wrote:No bro, you showed accusations. Years later they're still accusations, because there's not enough evidence to substantiate them.Forty Two wrote:Not surprised. Someone who is not interested in knowing the truth would definitely ignore the articles from huffpo, dailykos, Slate, politico, yahoo, and the varied, and left-leaning sources showing her to be a liar.piscator wrote:Forty Two wrote:So? She's still a lying piece of shit.
Sorry bro, I didn't get past the NYT link from 1994 about the Clintons claiming $100k in capital gains from commodities trading in their 1978 joint return.
Don't be so small-handed. You know as well as I do that Hillary is going to be our next President.
Washington Post editorial just shot down some of her lies about the email scandal -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... story.html and https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/p ... ?tid=a_inl