Reading Nietzsche
Reading Nietzsche
I own both The Antrichrist and Beyond good and evil, but I just can't read them. Whether its the old prose or because he has such a broad and sophisticated vocabulary I don't know. I've had allot of trouble in grasping anything in them. How do I learn to read it?
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
I wouldn't bother Loz. I read both in my 20s and they are the ramblings of a syphilitic crazy person.
Actually they are a bit more than that, but he was right up his own arse. As if all he went on about actually matters.
Actually they are a bit more than that, but he was right up his own arse. As if all he went on about actually matters.
Re: Reading Nietzsche
Rumertron wrote:I wouldn't bother Loz. I read both in my 20s and they are the ramblings of a syphilitic crazy person.
Actually they are a bit more than that, but he was right up his own arse. As if all he went on about actually matters.
Yeah but I want a challenge and the posterity.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
I think his stuff is grandiose and overblown. But what he did see was that human beings were liberated when they dropped god as a notion. He does of course go on to talk about the 'superman' and all that crap. Hitler was inspired by his thinking of course - though Nietzsche wasn't exactly a proto Nazi to my way of thinking.Lozzer wrote:Rumertron wrote:I wouldn't bother Loz. I read both in my 20s and they are the ramblings of a syphilitic crazy person.
Actually they are a bit more than that, but he was right up his own arse. As if all he went on about actually matters.
Yeah but I want a challenge and the posterity.
The grandiose ego focused attitude and the outdated language were the hard parts for me. Mind you you may have a newer translation.
- Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer
- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse. - Location: Nottingham UK
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
I agree with Rum. Get a book of Nietzschen aphorisms - they were the good bits in any case. Reading his books is like groping through a manure heap for dropped pearls.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56484
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
I thought Beyond Good and Evil was a great book. It's been 10 years since I read it, but I remember thinking it had a lot of merit.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: Reading Nietzsche
+1Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I agree with Rum. Get a book of Nietzschen aphorisms - they were the good bits in any case. Reading his books is like groping through a manure heap for dropped pearls.
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- SevenOfNine
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:38 am
- About me: RDF refugee :-(
- Location: Perth, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
Nietzsche had some brilliant insights, but like most philosophers he just goes on and on and on until one suspects he is spanking the pony, or flogging a dead horse.
Beliefs Are Irrational, we will assimilate you :=)
Logical Fallacies http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
AGNOTOLOGY: "The study of deliberately created ignorance-such as the falsehoods about evolution that are created by creationists".
Logical Fallacies http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
AGNOTOLOGY: "The study of deliberately created ignorance-such as the falsehoods about evolution that are created by creationists".
Re: Reading Nietzsche
Such insubordination.
Nietzsche is the best philosopher ever. He's the only one I ever read who I agree (almost) fully with. The fact that he's egotistical and grandiose is what makes him such a pleasure to read. He's like the gansta rapper of philosophy issuing the smackdown on other philosophers. He can say in one line what others spend a chapter on.
Look at Being and Nothingness by Sartre or Critique of Pure Reason by Kant, hundreds of pages of waffle in what basically could be written in a book 1 third of the size. In fact, I'd recommend skipping both of those books and reading a book about the book instead.
Another thing I liked about Nietzsche was his zero tolerance towards religion and superstition. His contempt of people who search for 'other worlds' instead of living in this one. His pure rubbishing of the ideas. Not many people back then would've done that. Reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra changed my life in this regard. I have never read a book before or since that changed my life in the short amount of time it took to read it (a few hours). I was a Buddhist at the time and also had a messed up life. I truely believed I had been born into this life as a runt of the litter, always pushed around and never achieving anything because of something I did in a previous life and that through baring with it and being good I would come back into the next life as someone special. In other words I was seeking a life beyond myself in order to compensate for my impotence in this one. Nietzsche destroyed that. I ditched Buddhism like a smoking gun after a crime and in a very short space of time dropped any other fantasies that may have been kicking around my head (more woo than white doves, ballistic shoot outs and face offs).
Nietzsche is a powerful writer and the personal trainer of philosophy with the serious motivation.
Nietzsche is the best philosopher ever. He's the only one I ever read who I agree (almost) fully with. The fact that he's egotistical and grandiose is what makes him such a pleasure to read. He's like the gansta rapper of philosophy issuing the smackdown on other philosophers. He can say in one line what others spend a chapter on.
Look at Being and Nothingness by Sartre or Critique of Pure Reason by Kant, hundreds of pages of waffle in what basically could be written in a book 1 third of the size. In fact, I'd recommend skipping both of those books and reading a book about the book instead.
Another thing I liked about Nietzsche was his zero tolerance towards religion and superstition. His contempt of people who search for 'other worlds' instead of living in this one. His pure rubbishing of the ideas. Not many people back then would've done that. Reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra changed my life in this regard. I have never read a book before or since that changed my life in the short amount of time it took to read it (a few hours). I was a Buddhist at the time and also had a messed up life. I truely believed I had been born into this life as a runt of the litter, always pushed around and never achieving anything because of something I did in a previous life and that through baring with it and being good I would come back into the next life as someone special. In other words I was seeking a life beyond myself in order to compensate for my impotence in this one. Nietzsche destroyed that. I ditched Buddhism like a smoking gun after a crime and in a very short space of time dropped any other fantasies that may have been kicking around my head (more woo than white doves, ballistic shoot outs and face offs).
Nietzsche is a powerful writer and the personal trainer of philosophy with the serious motivation.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: Reading Nietzsche
^ ThisNietzsche is the best philosopher ever. He's the only one I ever read who I agree (almost) fully with. The fact that he's egotistical and grandiose is what makes him such a pleasure to read. He's like the gansta rapper of philosophy issuing the smackdown on other philosophers. He can say in one line what others spend a chapter on.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." - Charles Bukowski
- Existentialist1844
- Clique Infiltrator
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:45 pm
- About me: Trying to avoid existential despair.
- Contact:
Re: Reading Nietzsche
+1Animavore wrote: Such insubordination.
Nietzsche is the best philosopher ever. He's the only one I ever read who I agree (almost) fully with. The fact that he's egotistical and grandiose is what makes him such a pleasure to read. He's like the gansta rapper of philosophy issuing the smackdown on other philosophers. He can say in one line what others spend a chapter on.
Look at Being and Nothingness by Sartre or Critique of Pure Reason by Kant, hundreds of pages of waffle in what basically could be written in a book 1 third of the size. In fact, I'd recommend skipping both of those books and reading a book about the book instead.
Another thing I liked about Nietzsche was his zero tolerance towards religion and superstition. His contempt of people who search for 'other worlds' instead of living in this one. His pure rubbishing of the ideas. Not many people back then would've done that. Reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra changed my life in this regard. I have never read a book before or since that changed my life in the short amount of time it took to read it (a few hours). I was a Buddhist at the time and also had a messed up life. I truely believed I had been born into this life as a runt of the litter, always pushed around and never achieving anything because of something I did in a previous life and that through baring with it and being good I would come back into the next life as someone special. In other words I was seeking a life beyond myself in order to compensate for my impotence in this one. Nietzsche destroyed that. I ditched Buddhism like a smoking gun after a crime and in a very short space of time dropped any other fantasies that may have been kicking around my head (more woo than white doves, ballistic shoot outs and face offs).
Nietzsche is a powerful writer and the personal trainer of philosophy with the serious motivation.
"Anyone can give up, it's the easiest thing in the world to do. But to hold it together when everyone else would understand if you fell apart, that's true strength."
Re: Reading Nietzsche
Really? Nietzsche?
I mean, he's okay, but my four year old cousin is better.
"It's not going to work because it's a stupid idea."
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests