That's a haunting image.Svartalf wrote:cream pies at ten paces, is it?Pappa wrote:Pah! I challenge you to a duel!Svartalf wrote:another cas of inverted books...Pappa wrote:Should: 1984
Shouldn't: Brave New World
Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23739
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.Pappa wrote:Shouldn't: Brave New World
Should read: The Communist Manifesto - K.Marx, F.Engels
Thinking of you, Coito, Warren et. al.

Waste of time: The Plumed Serpent - D.H.Lawrence
Unrelentingly turgid rendition of how the protagonists deal (or fail to deal) with primordial, deep, dark sexual forces written by someone who was terminally enamoured by the latest fashion of the time - Freud's psycho-analytical theories.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- JOZeldenrust
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
NOOOOO! 1984 is brilliant. Brave New World is a bit silly. The first scene is brilliant, but it goes down after that.Svartalf wrote:another cas of inverted books...Pappa wrote:Should: 1984
Shouldn't: Brave New World
Classic you should read (Dutch/Flemish literature edition):
L. P. Boon - De Kapellekensbaan
Classic you shouldn't read (Dutch/Flemish literature edition):
B. Huydecoper - Arzases
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Should: Dracula
Shouldn't: Pride and PrejuSNORE.
Shouldn't: Pride and PrejuSNORE.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
I think the meter is a bit off in Meeky's poem.The Mad Hatter wrote:Should: Dracula
Shouldn't: Pride and PrejuSNORE.
Great scansion, though.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour. The ideas presented about social engineering/control are very interesting, but they are surrounded with stupid fluff. The thing is a pile of wank. Besides, he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it. Orwell openly called Huxley a liar about (implying he'd plagiarised Zamyatin's book). I'd recommend reading We, it is an outstanding novel.Seraph wrote:You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here 

Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Now there's something I could really bury myself in, a good Trollope. Probably a very satisfying read...Bella Fortuna wrote:I have (unsurprisingly) a huge collection of Trollopes if you're interested.Clinton Huxley wrote:Quite enjoying it but not as many belly laughs as I was expectingBella Fortuna wrote:Great book - I read it 20 years ago or so.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm readin Tess of the D'Urbevilles at the mo...
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Both are like having one's teeth pulled, one by one....slowly....Animavore wrote:I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
I love the lack of black and white in each case. Now, that is sophistication.Pappa wrote:Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour.Seraph wrote:You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.
Having been accused of plagiarism by a lecturer once after genuinely thinking of something that turned out to be what Samuel Johnson famously said, and expressing that idea in almost the exact same words as he did, I can see that people are sometimes wrongly accused of intellectual theft.Pappa wrote:he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
War and Peace is one of the most well written books I've ever read. The attention to detail on the characters and their idiosyncrasiesis is practically unmatched.Coito ergo sum wrote:Both are like having one's teeth pulled, one by one....slowly....Animavore wrote:I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here
Ulysess has some amazing use of English.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Normally so would I, but Huxley didn't do it on purpose, he did it because he couldn't pin down which direction he wanted the book to go in. It was a failure on his part.Seraph wrote:I love the lack of black and white in each case. Now, that is sophistication.Pappa wrote:Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour.
It's very unlikely that Huxley was unaware of Zamyatin's book.Seraph wrote:Having been accused of plagiarism by a lecturer once after genuinely thinking of something that turned out to be what Samuel Johnson famously said, and expressing that idea in almost the exact same words as he did, I can see that people are sometimes wrongly accused of intellectual theft.Pappa wrote:he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
This guy goes through Ulysses paragraph by paragraph in a 5 minute podcast every week going through the many allusions, allegories, anagrams and codes in this book for anyone interested.
http://rejoyce.libsyn.com/rss
A warning though, some may find his voice annoying. It's a mix between Dublin and posh sop.
After 21 weeks he's still on the first chapter.
http://rejoyce.libsyn.com/rss
A warning though, some may find his voice annoying. It's a mix between Dublin and posh sop.
After 21 weeks he's still on the first chapter.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23739
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Classic you should read:-
Winnie the Pooh by A.A. Milne
Classic you shouldn't read:-
Vanity Fair by William Thackeray
Winnie the Pooh by A.A. Milne
Classic you shouldn't read:-
Vanity Fair by William Thackeray
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
http://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
- Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't
Clinton Huxley wrote:Classic you shouldn't read:-
Vanity Fair by William Thackeray

Anyhoo... nowhere else to put this, so PLONK.

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests