Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:29 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Pappa wrote:Should: 1984

Shouldn't: Brave New World
another cas of inverted books...
Pah! I challenge you to a duel!
cream pies at ten paces, is it?
That's a haunting image.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Hermit » Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:05 am

Pappa wrote:Shouldn't: Brave New World
You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.

Should read: The Communist Manifesto - K.Marx, F.Engels
Thinking of you, Coito, Warren et. al. ;)

Waste of time: The Plumed Serpent - D.H.Lawrence
Unrelentingly turgid rendition of how the protagonists deal (or fail to deal) with primordial, deep, dark sexual forces written by someone who was terminally enamoured by the latest fashion of the time - Freud's psycho-analytical theories.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
JOZeldenrust
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by JOZeldenrust » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:38 am

Svartalf wrote:
Pappa wrote:Should: 1984

Shouldn't: Brave New World
another cas of inverted books...
NOOOOO! 1984 is brilliant. Brave New World is a bit silly. The first scene is brilliant, but it goes down after that.

Classic you should read (Dutch/Flemish literature edition):

L. P. Boon - De Kapellekensbaan

Classic you shouldn't read (Dutch/Flemish literature edition):

B. Huydecoper - Arzases

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Trolldor » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:42 am

Should: Dracula
Shouldn't: Pride and PrejuSNORE.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Cunt » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:04 pm

The Mad Hatter wrote:Should: Dracula
Shouldn't: Pride and PrejuSNORE.
I think the meter is a bit off in Meeky's poem.

Great scansion, though.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Pappa » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:26 pm

Seraph wrote:You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.
Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour. The ideas presented about social engineering/control are very interesting, but they are surrounded with stupid fluff. The thing is a pile of wank. Besides, he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it. Orwell openly called Huxley a liar about (implying he'd plagiarised Zamyatin's book). I'd recommend reading We, it is an outstanding novel.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Animavore » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:33 pm

I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here :nono:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:38 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm readin Tess of the D'Urbevilles at the mo...
Great book - I read it 20 years ago or so.
Quite enjoying it but not as many belly laughs as I was expecting
I have (unsurprisingly) a huge collection of Trollopes if you're interested. :tea:
Now there's something I could really bury myself in, a good Trollope. Probably a very satisfying read...

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:38 pm

Animavore wrote:I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here :nono:
Both are like having one's teeth pulled, one by one....slowly....

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Hermit » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:23 pm

Pappa wrote:
Seraph wrote:You're fucking cuckoo, Pappa. Brave New World is the best, most forceful kick in the guts to people who advocate an elite in charge of social engineering/control based on behaviourism. Nobody before or since has come close to making such a trenchant satire of such proposals. Even the title, lifted from Shakespeare, is brilliantly apposite.
Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour.
I love the lack of black and white in each case. Now, that is sophistication.
Pappa wrote:he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it.
Having been accused of plagiarism by a lecturer once after genuinely thinking of something that turned out to be what Samuel Johnson famously said, and expressing that idea in almost the exact same words as he did, I can see that people are sometimes wrongly accused of intellectual theft.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Animavore » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:27 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Animavore wrote:I'm not happy with seeing Ulyseuss and War and Peace here :nono:
Both are like having one's teeth pulled, one by one....slowly....
War and Peace is one of the most well written books I've ever read. The attention to detail on the characters and their idiosyncrasiesis is practically unmatched.

Ulysess has some amazing use of English.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Pappa » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:32 pm

Seraph wrote:
Pappa wrote:Huxley wrote that he struggled with the book and could never decide if he was writing about a utopia or a distopia, and it shows. It flits between a serious attempt at comment and half-done humour.
I love the lack of black and white in each case. Now, that is sophistication.
Normally so would I, but Huxley didn't do it on purpose, he did it because he couldn't pin down which direction he wanted the book to go in. It was a failure on his part.
Seraph wrote:
Pappa wrote:he claims he had never read and wasn't influenced by We (Yevgeny Zamyatin). The book had been passed US literary circles, and it's unlikely he was unaware of it.
Having been accused of plagiarism by a lecturer once after genuinely thinking of something that turned out to be what Samuel Johnson famously said, and expressing that idea in almost the exact same words as he did, I can see that people are sometimes wrongly accused of intellectual theft.
It's very unlikely that Huxley was unaware of Zamyatin's book.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Animavore » Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:12 pm

This guy goes through Ulysses paragraph by paragraph in a 5 minute podcast every week going through the many allusions, allegories, anagrams and codes in this book for anyone interested.
http://rejoyce.libsyn.com/rss
A warning though, some may find his voice annoying. It's a mix between Dublin and posh sop.
After 21 weeks he's still on the first chapter.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:21 pm

Classic you should read:-

Winnie the Pooh by A.A. Milne

Classic you shouldn't read:-

Vanity Fair by William Thackeray
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Classics you should read, classics you shouldn't

Post by Bella Fortuna » Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:26 am

Clinton Huxley wrote:Classic you shouldn't read:-

Vanity Fair by William Thackeray
;ob; I liked that book!

Anyhoo... nowhere else to put this, so PLONK.

Image
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests