Yeah, I did a search and watched that youtube clip. Unfortunate;y the sound level is very low on the built-in speaker of my work computer, so I couldn't make out much of what he said. What I did hear, though, seemed spot on. One thing he says, and that occurred to me while watching the newer film, was that all the ambiguity was erased. The boy actually asks the girl, "Are you a vampire?" And I was like, "What? Nooooo! He can't fucking do that! WTF?" It's as if everything has to be spoon-fed to an American audience
This new film was different enough (something I had worried about) to stand on its own. And yet several scenes were
nearly identical to the original's. Again, I was like, WTF? And in the extras, the director goes on about loving the book, and contacting the writer, and developing the film and such. But he makes
absolutely no mention of the first film, the film he's
blatantly ripped off.
Another thing this reviewer said that I agree with: I'm very puzzled by the nearly universal positive reviewes and praise for this newer film, many of which said it was as good good as if not better than the original
It's really a shame because I was expecting to like this film,
wanted to like this film. I like both the male lead (from The Road) and the female lead (from Kick-Ass), and think they did a great job under the circumstances (particularly the boy). But they could only do so much under the inherent limitations of the script, and the direction of a director who didn't appear to understand what made the original work.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.