I agree... he needs an award.... like a kick in the face or something.Arse wrote:Actually, I think Mel Gibson wins the thread.
Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
- colubridae
- Custom Rank: Rank
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
- About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
- Location: Birmingham art gallery
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Arse wrote:Inglorious Basterds wins the thread.
Is this your shop?
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Mel Gibson has three mentions, nobody else has two. Shall we reproduce his "exit scene" in Braveheart? 
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Dances With WolvesPappa wrote:Another thread got me thinking about films that have messed about with history for entertainment or sometimes more sinister ends. The war film genre is rife, obviously, and kids films too (Pocahontas, the dodo bit in Ice Age 2).![]()
What's the most spectacular misrepresentation in film?
Troy
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves
Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire
Gladiator
Oh, and Samurai, with Tom Snooze.
To name some that come to mind as giant facepalms.....
EDITED...
Last edited by Coito ergo sum on Tue May 04, 2010 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
No, but it should be.colubridae wrote:Arse wrote:Inglorious Basterds wins the thread.
Is this your shop?
What was wrong with Gladiator? I thought that was pretty historically accurate.
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Never mind planes flying impossibly close to the ground without crashing. That's what you get for using CGI too much, instead of actual aircraft that have to fly like, well, real airplanes.Ian wrote:Pearl Harbor immediately springs to mind. I will never forgive Jerry Bruckheimer for producing that movie.
Japanese fighters strafing the hospital grounds, the Japanese intentions behind the attack, the images of backlit modern US Navy warships substituted for the Japanese fleet (I wouldn't have guessed they were feeling so cheap about the special effects, but the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier alone jumped out as being really out of place), the scene of Roosevelt standing up from his wheelchair to make a point, etc. Too much to list, really.![]()
I saw it during a port visit in Istanbul. My friend and I were probably the only Americans in the theater. After the movie ended, I really felt embarassed for us.
A big nod to Braveheart, too. Mostly since the Battle of Stirling Bridge did not involve a bridge in the film!
Braveheart also gets a vote from me.
Actually, many films take dangerous liberties when it comes to portraying the facts. Don't get me started ... :I-love-pork:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Somebody remind me of the name of the RN destroyer sunk by Bismarck?
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
U-571
Bastard merkins did not capture the enigma machine
Bastard merkins did not capture the enigma machine
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
The Americans did actually capture a U boat with an enigma machine on it, but it was not until June, 1944. The Canadians captured one also. The Brits captured all the rest of the Enigma materials captured at sea. Apparently, the Poles, though, captured one and did some code breaking of it before the invasion of Poland. No one nation is responsible for cracking Enigma.Ghatanothoa wrote:U-571![]()
Bastard merkins did not capture the enigma machine
U-571 was never captured by anyone, and was destroyed and all its crew killed, by an Australian crewed aircraft.
The whole movie was made up bullcrap from the get-go.
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
The Hood?Gawdzilla wrote:Somebody remind me of the name of the RN destroyer sunk by Bismarck?
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Nope, Solent, IIRC correctly. Never actually happened, but it was a fun bit in the movie. No idea why they threw it in, except maybe that Bismarck hadn't done enough damage yet, despite Hood. Daft if you ask me. The audience lived through that period, so they'd know which ships were lost.Coito ergo sum wrote:The Hood?Gawdzilla wrote:Somebody remind me of the name of the RN destroyer sunk by Bismarck?
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Spartacus. All that Christianity put into it 
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- AshtonBlack
- Tech Monkey

- Posts: 7773
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
- Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
THE FUCKING PATRIOT!

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
-
Coito ergo sum
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
Christ that movie sucked.AshtonBlack wrote:THE FUCKING PATRIOT!
It never ceases to amaze me that Hollywood can't fucking make a movie that is not black-and-white - good and evil - good guys and bad guys - with no nuance.
Naturally, the brits were portrayed as either evil, or aristocratic and soft, and the Americans were portrayed as clean lovers of liberty who were fighting off an invasion force.....and, of course, the "hapless" British military....that never ceases to amaze me -- one of the greatest militaries in the world, the British army and navy - a force that allowed a small portion of an island to conquer a good portion of the globe and form an empire upon which the sun never set - is portrayed as hapless and inept, except when committing savage atrocities....
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of historical revisionism in film
You have to give The Patriot one thing. They got Tarleton dead bang.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

