Da Schneib shows up late

[Bella Fortuna]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

[Thinking Aloud]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

Welcome back to Ratz.

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

[Robert_S]

I'm starting to wonder if that's what's going on here.

It's a conspiracy. Probably a conspiracy of lies. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberries. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberry cheesecake and apple crumble in the same meal.

"Of course! Of course, I t was a jackal-headed woman with her eyes akimbo, a King sitting sideways on his throne, adrip with gold, chipped nose up-lifted-thusly! All engraven on a Pyramis of Massey size, with the body of a Lion, paws that refreshes, a tale told by an idiot, and the head of a Fox!"

[rachelbean]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

                      

!!1!	NOTMOD No.

[Ayaan]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

The outfit with with the wet celery and the flying helmet?

[Bella Fortuna]

I'm starting to wonder if that's what's going on here.

It's a conspiracy. Probably a conspiracy of lies. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberries. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberry cheesecake and apple crumble in the same meal.

You left out the custard. There's been a custard cover-up here!

[Schneibster]

If you don't like the way things are done here, you have a number of options: -

A. Live with it.
(You seem incapable of this option, so we'll ignore it.)

B. Persuade others to see your point of view and get things changed.
(I think that you think you are trying this - but all you are doing is repeating yourself and annoying everyone - hardly the most effective method of persuasion.)

Unfortunately, it's kind of hard to avoid repeating yourself when you point at the elephant in the middle of the room and everybody says "what elephant" as they trip over its feet and ignore being held upside down in its trunk. I think it's the one who ignores it when the elephant drops a huge load of dung on top of him that disturbs me the most.

C. Find somewhere else that is more to your liking.
(There might actually be somewhere that is already run to your exacting requirements - but it's not here, apparently.)

Yeah, I guess not getting moderator warnings that tell me not to do things that aren't against the rules is pretty stringent all right.

What do you do for an encore, gargle peanut butter?

D. Start your own site, where you make the rules and interpret them.
(That's what happened when this site was first created - and it has run well for a couple of years now with an active and steady membership.)

Yeah, everything was just hunky dory until the wrong questions got asked.

Which I predicted. Which has now happened. Which you're still denying as you keep on doing the same stupid thing you started with, which is issuing moderator warnings for things that aren't against the rules.

And please stop threatening to leave.

I'm not threatening anything. That's you trying to change the subject again.

Either fuck off or stay.

That's what I'm deciding, yep. When did you figure that out, anyway?

Nothing is more annoying than repeated threats of suicide. It's passive-aggressive bullshit.

And it's not passive-aggressive to keep trying to change the subject whenever inconsistencies are brought up?

OK.

[Bella Fortuna]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

The outfit with with the wet celery and the flying helmet?

There ain't no other kind, babe.

[Ayaan]

Yes

Well do something. What kind of outfit issues a moderator proclamation with a logical inconsistency in it?

A tight and sexy outfit, that's what.

The outfit with with the wet celery and the flying helmet?

There ain't no other kind, babe.

[Thinking Aloud]

The elephant in the room is a beloved Ratz pet, and has been here since day one. I won't have anyone driving him out.

[Xamonas Chegwé]

If you don't like the way things are done here, you have a number of options: -

A. Live with it.
(You seem incapable of this option, so we'll ignore it.)

B. Persuade others to see your point of view and get things changed.
(I think that you think you are trying this - but all you are doing is repeating yourself and annoying everyone - hardly the most effective method of persuasion.)

Unfortunately, it's kind of hard to avoid repeating yourself when you point at the elephant in the middle of the room and everybody says "what elephant" as they trip over its feet and ignore being held upside down in its trunk. I think it's the one who ignores it when the elephant drops a huge load of dung on top of him that disturbs me the most.

C. Find somewhere else that is more to your liking.
(There might actually be somewhere that is already run to your exacting requirements - but it's not here, apparently.)

Yeah, I guess not getting moderator warnings that tell me not to do things that aren't against the rules is pretty stringent all right.

What do you do for an encore, gargle peanut butter?

D. Start your own site, where you make the rules and interpret them.
(That's what happened when this site was first created - and it has run well for a couple of years now with an active and steady membership.)

Yeah, everything was just hunky dory until the wrong questions got asked.

Which I predicted. Which has now happened. Which you're still denying as you keep on doing the same stupid thing you started with, which is issuing moderator warnings for things that aren't against the rules.

And please stop threatening to leave.

I'm not threatening anything. That's you trying to change the subject again.

Either fuck off or stay.

That's what I'm deciding, yep. When did you figure that out, anyway?

Nothing is more annoying than repeated threats of suicide. It's passive-aggressive bullshit.

And it's not passive-aggressive to keep trying to change the subject whenever inconsistencies are brought up?

OK.

THERE'S AN ELEPHANT IN TEH ROOMZ!11!! RUNZ RUNZ RUNZ!!1!!

[Schneibster]

I'm starting to wonder if that's what's going on here.

It's a conspiracy. Probably a conspiracy of lies. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberries. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberry cheesecake and apple crumble in the same meal.

So this is basically "proof" of your earlier statement that something I said was a "lie."

OK.

[Xamonas Chegwé]

I'm starting to wonder if that's what's going on here.

It's a conspiracy. Probably a conspiracy of lies. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberries. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberry cheesecake and apple crumble in the same meal.

So this is basically "proof" of your earlier statement that something I said was a "lie."

OK.

Liar, liar, pants on fire!

[Thinking Aloud]

I'm starting to wonder if that's what's going on here.

It's a conspiracy. Probably a conspiracy of lies. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberries. Probably a conspiracy of lies concocted by idiots who eat raspberry cheesecake and apple crumble in the same meal.

So this is basically "proof" of your earlier statement that something I said was a "lie."

OK.

Wrong again!