I'm sure you do.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:10 pm
*some crappy video*
You can play DM songs at the same time....
Scientific Proof Of God
- rainbow
- Posts: 13528
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Music can be used for various operationsrainbow wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:25 pmI'm sure you do.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:10 pm
*some crappy video*
You can play DM songs at the same time....
"Torture Methods With Sound: How Pure Noise Can Be Used To Break You Psychologically" https://www.medicaldaily.com/torture-me ... lly-318638
- rainbow
- Posts: 13528
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Relax. The noises in your head don't bother me.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 11:32 pmMusic can be used for various operationsrainbow wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:25 pmI'm sure you do.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:10 pm
*some crappy video*
You can play DM songs at the same time....
"Torture Methods With Sound: How Pure Noise Can Be Used To Break You Psychologically" https://www.medicaldaily.com/torture-me ... lly-318638
...but thank you for expressing concern
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:40 amRelax. The noises in your head don't bother me.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 11:32 pmMusic can be used for various operationsrainbow wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:25 pmI'm sure you do.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:10 pm
*some crappy video*
You can play DM songs at the same time....
"Torture Methods With Sound: How Pure Noise Can Be Used To Break You Psychologically" https://www.medicaldaily.com/torture-me ... lly-318638
...but thank you for expressing concern
Maybe I'll answer your 1 question if are able to word it properly...
- rainbow
- Posts: 13528
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Don't put yourself out.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:36 pmMaybe I'll answer your 1 question if are able to word it properly...
If your God requires you to spread the word, you should describe your God, so we can work out what we're dealing with.
...up to you.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
My description of God would be everything inside and outside of the physical Universe, therefore something Unnameable and beyond human comprehension.rainbow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 6:43 amDon't put yourself out.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:36 pmMaybe I'll answer your 1 question if are able to word it properly...
If your God requires you to spread the word, you should describe your God, so we can work out what we're dealing with.
...up to you.
As for the spreading the word:
The objective was simple:
1) To reveal that Nostradamus was a genuine prophet who could predict
the future with 100% accuracy;
2) To demonstrate that prophecy and atheism are not compatible with
each other and are mutually exclusive;
3) Therefore Dawkins, Pz, Randi and their skeptic atheist followers
were deluded liars, who would end by being subjected to what they wanted to happen upon others…
And we achieved our MISSION 100%
(NOTE: Again, there is a fundamental difference between trying to debate people who are open to new ideas and closed-minded atheists who only want to destroy.
For the latter, do not waste your time. Let us deal with them!)
___________
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
"Police arrest anti-monarchy protesters at royal events in England, Scotland" https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/po ... r-AA11LHVH
Hey Peacock... so was she a REAL QUEEN?
Hey Peacock... so was she a REAL QUEEN?
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 37953
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
#notmymonarchsuperuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:50 pm"Police arrest anti-monarchy protesters at royal events in England, Scotland" https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/po ... r-AA11LHVH
Hey Peacock... so was she a REAL QUEEN?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- rainbow
- Posts: 13528
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
OK, so the God Being is beyond our comprehension.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:42 pmMy description of God would be everything inside and outside of the physical Universe, therefore something Unnameable and beyond human comprehension.rainbow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 6:43 amDon't put yourself out.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:36 pmMaybe I'll answer your 1 question if are able to word it properly...
If your God requires you to spread the word, you should describe your God, so we can work out what we're dealing with.
...up to you.
___________
It follows that any discussion is futile.
...but Nostradamus failed to predict Brexit.As for the spreading the word:
The objective was simple:
1) To reveal that Nostradamus was a genuine prophet who could predict
the future with 100% accuracy;
2) To demonstrate that prophecy and atheism are not compatible with
each other and are mutually exclusive;
3) Therefore Dawkins, Pz, Randi and their skeptic atheist followers
were deluded liars, who would end by being subjected to what they wanted to happen upon others…
And we achieved our MISSION 100%
(NOTE: Again, there is a fundamental difference between trying to debate people who are open to new ideas and closed-minded atheists who only want to destroy.
For the latter, do not waste your time. Let us deal with them!)
Explain.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40340
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Nostradamus' predictions never materialized, and anyway, since he was specifically writin for the benefit of Catherine de Medici, nothing in his writings can possibly regard any events past 1600 AD.
As for god being beyond comprehension that's wrong, since your definition includes everything in the universe, it ensue that we are part of god, so we can say "I am divine, and nothing divine is foreign to me". Since miracles are beyond us, is also ensues dog can't make any either.
As for god being beyond comprehension that's wrong, since your definition includes everything in the universe, it ensue that we are part of god, so we can say "I am divine, and nothing divine is foreign to me". Since miracles are beyond us, is also ensues dog can't make any either.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
"For kingdoms, governments, sects, and religions will make changes so complete, truly diameterically opposite, that if I came to reveal what will happen in the future, the great ones of the above kingdoms, sects, religions, and faiths would find it so little in accord with what their fancy would like to hear, that they would condemn that which future centuries will know and perceive to be true."Svartalf wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 5:12 pmNostradamus' predictions never materialized, and anyway, since he was specifically writin for the benefit of Catherine de Medici, nothing in his writings can possibly regard any events past 1600 AD.
As for god being beyond comprehension that's wrong, since your definition includes everything in the universe, it ensue that we are part of god, so we can say "I am divine, and nothing divine is foreign to me". Since miracles are beyond us, is also ensues dog can't make any either.
Only about the 16th century?
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40340
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Literally no incentive to go further, his boss will not be generous over stuff that does not regard her preoccupation, and let's be clear, she was not out to try and be known in history, her only preoccupation was the events and politics of her time, such as might affect herself and her royal offspring. Not to mention that at the time, any kind of divination smacked of sorcery and was quite apt to cause you major trouble... after all, He WAS imprisoned by royal order some years before being made the king's own physician. So his making any kind of pronostications not directly approved by his royal patrons (and they approve what interests them) is quite unlikely... royal favor was known to be fickle, and it would not have been too low for a weak king like Charles IX to yield a cumbersome underling to the inquisition, just to score brownie points with somebody.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
So you are saying it was all a massive lie or that he was mentally ill?Svartalf wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:10 pmLiterally no incentive to go further, his boss will not be generous over stuff that does not regard her preoccupation, and let's be clear, she was not out to try and be known in history, her only preoccupation was the events and politics of her time, such as might affect herself and her royal offspring. Not to mention that at the time, any kind of divination smacked of sorcery and was quite apt to cause you major trouble... after all, He WAS imprisoned by royal order some years before being made the king's own physician. So his making any kind of pronostications not directly approved by his royal patrons (and they approve what interests them) is quite unlikely... royal favor was known to be fickle, and it would not have been too low for a weak king like Charles IX to yield a cumbersome underling to the inquisition, just to score brownie points with somebody.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests