A secular debate about eating meat.

Holy Crap!
Post Reply
User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Gallstones » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:04 pm

Azathoth wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:... Unfortunately cooking from scratch is not an American forté.
Slight tangent, sorry. But making things from scratch was very much the norm in my house growing up as a kid, and I'm grateful for it. I still try to make things from scratch as much as possible. When people see this...like, that I make pancakes from scratch for instance instead of from a box or even pre-made batter from a bottle- hell, my roommate even buys pre-made individually wrapped pancakes that you heat in the microwave!...well, they are astonished, and act as if it's some strange form of alchemy.
Pre-made batter :shock: It's 3 fucking ingredients mixed together in a bowl. Lazy cunts
And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21890
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by tattuchu » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:14 pm

Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by sandinista » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:20 pm

tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.
I had chokecherry pancakes once...thought they were Saskatoon berry's, had to spit out seed with every bite! :doh:
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Gallstones » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:27 pm

tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.

Make me breakfast. :food:

With bacon. :food:

And coffee. :coffee:

And juice--you fresh squeeze don't you? :td:
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Gallstones » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:29 pm

sandinista wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.
I had chokecherry pancakes once...thought they were Saskatoon berry's, had to spit out seed with every bite! :doh:
They are a bit tedious to pit.
Imagine pomegranate pancakes.

I brought strawberries with half and half and wildflower honey to work for lunch today.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21890
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by tattuchu » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:41 pm

Gallstones wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.

Make me breakfast. :food:

With bacon. :food:

And coffee. :coffee:

And juice--you fresh squeeze don't you? :td:
Sandi, I don't know what those things are. I don't understand Canadian English :cry:

Gallstones, I usually put some nutmeg and cinnamon (both freshly grated if possible) in my oatmeal pancakes, and a little bit of citrus peel to give it a nice flavor. I don't usually put sugar in them, because I drown them afterwards in real maple syrup :drool:

Juice? Um... :oops: No, I never fresh squeeze :leave:
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

User avatar
Sælir
The Obedient Wife
Posts: 3218
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:48 am
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Sælir » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:47 pm

I think the outlook on eating meat varies a lot for where you come from. I suppose most animals here are raised in a way we would call humane. Sheep stay out up in the mountains during the summertime, cows go out twice a day at least all year (and during the summer they stay out most of the day) etc. They are not raised on corn but grass the whole year around. Although I do not think our chicken farms are different from anywhere else and I really think that´s a shame since their living conditions suck. Nobody here really thinks about eating meat as anything wrong and I suppose we just need more education on what´s happening in the world since we do have to import meat too and we don´t have a clue how the animals there are treated :dunno:

Yes, and I consider it weird not making things from scratch :biggrin:
I´m just a delicate little flower!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41217
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Svartalf » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:56 pm

Actually, Sandinista, I know the kind of length a tru vegetarian has to go to eat right by his rules (used to know a macrobiotic follower, and spent some extended time living with a relative who won't touch flesh, fish nor egg)
It's definitely a lot easier to get any number of nutriments from meat related products, not to mention the fact you can spend less time cooking. If I were wealthy and had a cook as part of my staff, I might be more willing to indulge into complicated diets... ssince I don't, and I'd rather spend my time elsewhere than in the kitchen... well, I'll do like my ape ancestor and consume flesh.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41217
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Svartalf » Sat Feb 05, 2011 8:59 pm

Gallstones wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
JimC wrote:There's no debate.

Some of us like eating meat.

Some don't.

End of story.
How about a secular debate about gin?

Some of us like their gin neat

Others need to mix it.

I don't like gin and my body is not designed to imbibe it as part of a balanced drinking regimen.
Vodka is the only way to drink humanely. And whiskey. And wine. And beer. Some rum or cognac once in a while. But never gin.
I was proposing a debate for gin drinkers. vodka topers not welcome, come back when we're addressing whiskey.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by sandinista » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:07 pm

Svartalf wrote:Actually, Sandinista, I know the kind of length a tru vegetarian has to go to eat right by his rules (used to know a macrobiotic follower, and spent some extended time living with a relative who won't touch flesh, fish nor egg)
It's definitely a lot easier to get any number of nutriments from meat related products, not to mention the fact you can spend less time cooking. If I were wealthy and had a cook as part of my staff, I might be more willing to indulge into complicated diets... ssince I don't, and I'd rather spend my time elsewhere than in the kitchen... well, I'll do like my ape ancestor and consume flesh.
Sometimes...easier doesn't mean better. Sure it would be "easier" for me to eat at mcshit every day and sit on the couch watching TV, but I would prefer doing "harder" things I suppose. BTW, you don't need to be rich to be vegetarian, go to India.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74351
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by JimC » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:27 pm

sandinista wrote:

and now, after further evolution, a vegetarian diet is as healthy, in some cases more so, than a meat based diet.
1. There has been insufficient time for any major evolutionary change to our digestive system since the agricultural revolution. In physical terms, it is still adapted to the diet provided by a hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

2. A modern vegetarian diet may well be healthier than the diets of many in the west at the moment, who clearly consume more meat, fat, sugar etc than a normal hunter-gatherer diet would provide.

3. However, long term health on a vegetarian diet, possible though it undoubtedly is, requires very careful choices to avoid dietary deficiencies that a small amount of lean meat and fish per week will easily avoid.
Gin's not so bad, with tonic.
:tup: :clap: :td: :drunk:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:45 pm

tattuchu wrote:And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make.
Roast beef is the easiest thing in the world to make. Heat up the oven, stick the roast in, take it out when it's done. None of this complicated "multiple ingredients" stuff.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:48 pm

Svartalf wrote:Actually, Sandinista, I know the kind of length a tru vegetarian has to go to eat right by his rules (used to know a macrobiotic follower, and spent some extended time living with a relative who won't touch flesh, fish nor egg)
If they allow themselves dairy and aren't allergic to it or lactose intolerant,they can get most of the nutrients missing from plant foods from dairy.

Of course, dairy cattle are possibly the least humanely treated of modern farm animals.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Gallstones » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:59 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
JimC wrote:There's no debate.

Some of us like eating meat.

Some don't.

End of story.
How about a secular debate about gin?

Some of us like their gin neat

Others need to mix it.

I don't like gin and my body is not designed to imbibe it as part of a balanced drinking regimen.
Vodka is the only way to drink humanely. And whiskey. And wine. And beer. Some rum or cognac once in a while. But never gin.
I was proposing a debate for gin drinkers. vodka topers not welcome, come back when we're addressing whiskey.
  • :brood: Vodka is more versatile than gin.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: A secular debate about eating meat.

Post by Gallstones » Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:05 pm

tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
tattuchu wrote:
Gallstones wrote: And not only that, you can modify and adjust and fancy things up in ways that are even more magical.
I know, right? And I used pancakes as an example because they're quite possibly the easiest thing in the world to make. But I never make plain pancakes. I like oatmeal pancakes, or cornmeal, or blueberry, or...well, the possibilities are endless.

Make me breakfast. :food:

With bacon. :food:

And coffee. :coffee:

And juice--you fresh squeeze don't you? :td:
Sandi, I don't know what those things are. I don't understand Canadian English :cry:

Gallstones, I usually put some nutmeg and cinnamon (both freshly grated if possible) in my oatmeal pancakes, and a little bit of citrus peel to give it a nice flavor. I don't usually put sugar in them, because I drown them afterwards in real maple syrup :drool:
Yes. pancakes don't need sugar really. I may try this. I like to use cinnamon with beef and nutmeg with chicken.


Juice? Um... :oops: No, I never fresh squeeze :leave:
  • :smug:
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests