Scientific Proof Of God
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/64o ... intro.html
"Does not the threat of an atomic catastrophe which could wipe out the human race also serve to protect the very forces which perpetuate this danger?"
A contradiction that must inevitably explode...
"Does not the threat of an atomic catastrophe which could wipe out the human race also serve to protect the very forces which perpetuate this danger?"
A contradiction that must inevitably explode...
- laklak
- Posts: 20988
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I don't fight god, you can't fight a myth. Might as well fight leprechauns (NOT a good idea, they're hard little bastards). Anyway, I also don't fight capitalism. Capitalism be berry good to me. Could have been better, of course, another couple of zeros on my net worth wouldn't go amiss, but I can't complain. I don't worry about nuclear annihilation either, there're ain't fuck all I can do about it. Plus I lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis and the whole Cold War, so this little kerfuffle barely shows up on the radar.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38137
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yeah, I'm mortal, and the mighty Odin will welcome me at the doors of Valhalla if I die with my sword in my hand.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 59472
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
A pork sword?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73185
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
He does bang on about his invisible friend, doesn't he...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40412
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
superuniverse, if your best argument from anything involves quoting Nostradamus, you lose all credibility in my eyes.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Superuniverse. I have a non-belief in the existence of a God. Theists have a belief in a God. If incontrovertible evidence can be presented for the existence of a God, then I would have no 'non-belief', and consequentially, a theist would no longer be required to have a 'belief', since in both cases they would be replaced by evidential knowledge.
Since you still claim to have a 'belief' in a God, you must therefore have no evidence in this matter.
Since you still claim to have a 'belief' in a God, you must therefore have no evidence in this matter.
Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power - Eric Hoffer.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40412
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
What might be funny if it were not tragic is that god botherers insist that god is good when there is incontrovertible evidence that it is evil, having tolerated countless atrocities, general evilness, and leaving so many humans in utter misery.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yabbut free will and original sin...Svartalf wrote:What might be funny if it were not tragic is that god botherers insist that god is good when there is incontrovertible evidence that it is evil, having tolerated countless atrocities, general evilness, and leaving so many humans in utter misery.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40412
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
bug it, a good god would have not tolerated the snake in its paradise in the first place... it would not have created the snake in the first place, and it would protect good people from the results of evil ones' free will,
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
The snake was a very clever device to test human virtuosity. Result: Snake 1 Humans 0.Svartalf wrote:bug it, a good god would have not tolerated the snake in its paradise in the first place... it would not have created the snake in the first place, and it would protect good people from the results of evil ones' free will,
There are no good or evil people if there were no free will and no agent to test that will.
God's wisdom is clearly beyond your comprehension, but I can help you attain salvation if only you have faith in my ministry and send tithes to my small but swiftly growing mega(to be)church Inc. Check your inbox for the account number to deposit the mulah into, though I do prefer bitcoins, for which I also provided the relevant instructions. Bitcoins are preferable because the taxation office cannot trace them.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
You should say bitcoins are preferable because dollars have the mark of the beast on them
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38137
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
God is the ultimate in all his attributes - there can be nothing that is greater than God in any regard. If he is evil then he is absolute more than the most evil thing imaginable, he is the most evil thing possible.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
NineBerry wrote:US dollars have the mark of the beast on them
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
And the mark of the Masons. The Illuminati are not far behind...
Mark my words!
Mark my words!
Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power - Eric Hoffer.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer proof nor do I have to determine absence of proof because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests