Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17990
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
If you think really, really hard, and don't make mistakes you'll see things his way.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
His advocacy of meditation/mindfulness does not bother me. The practice need not involve wooish elements, and I don't think Harris's version includes any. More worrying is his advocacy of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Islam (which he denies in most unconvincingly manner) and his absurd concept of "objective morality". It is for those two reasons I regard him as a nutcase.
By the way, Harris describes himself as a neuroscientist. I cannot find any information about him being employed as such. All I could discover (per Wikipedia) is that he was awarded a BA (philosophy) from Stanford University in 2000 and a PhD (cognitive neuroscience) from the UCLA in 2009. His thesis was titled "The moral landscape: How science could determine human values". His own site, the page About Sam Harris is totally silent on his employment history. It only summarises his publications. Can anyone help me out?
By the way, Harris describes himself as a neuroscientist. I cannot find any information about him being employed as such. All I could discover (per Wikipedia) is that he was awarded a BA (philosophy) from Stanford University in 2000 and a PhD (cognitive neuroscience) from the UCLA in 2009. His thesis was titled "The moral landscape: How science could determine human values". His own site, the page About Sam Harris is totally silent on his employment history. It only summarises his publications. Can anyone help me out?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73208
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
His early writings seemed OK, but his recent stuff is unconvincing. Evolutionary biology and neuroscience can provide a useful background for ethical decision making, as long as one is careful not to partake of the naturalistic fallacy...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 59512
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
Hermit x 2
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38192
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
As nutcases go he's not really that nutty. He certainly ain't no bananaman.Hermit wrote:His advocacy of meditation/mindfulness does not bother me. The practice need not involve wooish elements, and I don't think Harris's version includes any. More worrying is his advocacy of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Islam (which he denies in most unconvincingly manner) and his absurd concept of "objective morality". It is for those two reasons I regard him as a nutcase.
By the way, Harris describes himself as a neuroscientist. I cannot find any information about him being employed as such. All I could discover (per Wikipedia) is that he was awarded a BA (philosophy) from Stanford University in 2000 and a PhD (cognitive neuroscience) from the UCLA in 2009. His thesis was titled "The moral landscape: How science could determine human values". His own site, the page About Sam Harris is totally silent on his employment history. It only summarises his publications. Can anyone help me out?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
Parts of him are excellent.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Tue Oct 09, 2018 12:25 pmAs nutcases go he's not really that nutty. He certainly ain't no bananaman.Hermit wrote:His advocacy of meditation/mindfulness does not bother me. The practice need not involve wooish elements, and I don't think Harris's version includes any. More worrying is his advocacy of a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Islam (which he denies in most unconvincingly manner) and his absurd concept of "objective morality". It is for those two reasons I regard him as a nutcase.
By the way, Harris describes himself as a neuroscientist. I cannot find any information about him being employed as such. All I could discover (per Wikipedia) is that he was awarded a BA (philosophy) from Stanford University in 2000 and a PhD (cognitive neuroscience) from the UCLA in 2009. His thesis was titled "The moral landscape: How science could determine human values". His own site, the page About Sam Harris is totally silent on his employment history. It only summarises his publications. Can anyone help me out?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38192
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Has Sam Harris Gone Full Woo Guru Now?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests