Hermit wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 3:52 am
Time to unscramble your assertion.
You warmed up a six week old post of mine, in which I wrote:
Hermit wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 4:41 pm
Give me links to court cases in which the ironically named Project Veritas was accused of lying and won.
You cited a court case, in which - according to you
Cunt wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 4:03 pm
The recent court decision shows that the NYTimes was full of shit
That court decision does no such thing.
You are right, of course. I read an article referencing a court case, which opened with...
A New York judge slammed The New York Times for blurring the lines between news and opinion. The paper had attempted to get a defamation lawsuit against it dismissed on the grounds that, among other things, its reporters were just expressing their personal opinions when they disparaged the investigative journalists at Project Veritas.
The judge ruled the lawsuit can go forward, finding that Project Veritas showed sufficient evidence that The New York Times may have been motivated by “actual malice” and acted with “reckless disregard” when it ran several articles against the investigative journalism outfit.
So yeah, it sounds like another 'news' agency has been spreading bullshit about Project Veritas.
I still think their 'wall of retractions' contains a lot more relevant information about media bias than your dislike of them.
The case was not even about what the New York Times wrote. It was about an application by the NYT to have the case complaining about defamation brought on by the ironically named Project Veritas dismissed. In his judgement Justice J.Woods declined to dismiss it. He made no judgement about the truth or otherwise of the articles in question.
In conclusion, you failed once again to provide links to court cases in which the ironically named Project Veritas was accused of lying and won.
Yes, I said court case, when I should have made the distinction that the article
said things about a court case.
I got tricked again.
Funny how I still believe Project Veritas over most other news orgs. Must be that 'wall of shame' thing they do when brave idiots slander them in public (or maybe it's libel)
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.