Post
by Cunt » Wed Mar 17, 2021 8:57 pm
The constitution seems to grant rights, like the right to bear arms, but it is LOADED with responsibilities, which are taken up by men willing to be dangerous.
For example, lots of criticisms of men with guns shooting people, but VERY few people willing to take on the job of police, because they know they might have to kill someone.
I wish the constitution had focused a bit more on the responsibilities, rather than the rights.
Picture everyone sitting in a room, in a circle, in easy range of each other. Give each of them a gun, and then tell them they can say anything.
That's the states, and if you imagine it large enough, some of those in the circle will be terrible, and the job of addressing it will fall to others in the circle.
It's a very dangerous circle of people.
Lots of people wish they could opt out of the circle, and pretend they aren't willing to shoot people, but they ALL fund a proxy to take that seat for them (police, or military, or private security). So they don't oppose having someone shoot, they just want their favourite group to be the only one with power. Usually 'democratically elected officials', but whether that is what happens can be one of the things that is talked about.
Like asking for a vote on how many genders should be allowed to play in a womens' sports league, democracy sometimes only suits folks when they expect to win that vote.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.
Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.