Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post Reply
User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Jason » Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:21 pm

Personally, I think a modern conception of communism is possible wherein the individual is allowed a certain level of private 'wealth' (although I don't like that term) - so that they may have private possessions, like clothing, tools, perhaps including computers, televisions, smartphones, and other similar devices, while doing away with other possessions such as land and structures, perhaps even automobiles (although I'm not sure about that one).

What do you think?

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Hermit » Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:39 pm

As far as Karl Marx was concerned, communism never involved the abolition of personal possessions. I can't be bothered rewriting what I wrote about it before, so here is a copypasta job. Again.
Hermit wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:13 am
Svartalf wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:21 am
outright communism is definitely out for me, I enjoy my rights to private property and would be bothered if people came rifling through my library as if it were some kind of common resource.
I am getting a little tired of arguing about this particular canard, so I'll just copypaste what I said about it previously.
Hermit wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:02 am
FBM wrote:How do you stand on the issue of private property ownership? Would we be better off without it?
Perfect thread for this question. :hehe:

"The abolition of private property" is one of the most often used phrases for scaring the population. It seems to imply that Marx and Engels wanted to create a society in which you can't own a bed, and that the bowl of soup might be snatched from under your spoon at any time and for any reason. Nowhere did Marx or Engels even imply any such thing. When they spoke of the abolition of private property, they only ever used the phrase in the context of the means of production - factories, agricultural landholdings, money used solely to create more money and so forth. They wanted none of that privately owned. While strictly speaking such personal property such as your bed, your soup, your tampon, is a subset of private property, they never concerned themselves with it in relationship to privatisation because it is not a means of production, and as such irrelevant to the relation between capital and labour.

I should note here that I am not a communist in the Marxian sense. Marx was just another obsessively scribbling utopian, and his conception of revolutionary communism can at best be described as fatally inadequate, and looking at all instances where communism through revolution has been attempted, fucking disastrous.
Hermit wrote:
Mon Apr 09, 2018 5:17 am
PsychoSerenity wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:That's the thing with communism though, why it will never work - people like to own stuff.
But there's no reason under certainly some forms of communism why the vast majority of people couldn't still own as much as they do under capitalism. There's no reason to end ownership of personal property. About the largest thing that could be considered personal property is a home. What would need to be stopped is private and for profit ownership of non-personal property e.g means of production or someone else's home.
Brian Peacock wrote:Sure. But that's not really communism is it?
Actually, it is. Marx and Engels never wrote about the expropriation of private property in the context of your underpants, toothbrush or roof over your head. They only ever used the term "private property" in the context of privately owned means of production. Only through the judicious application of quote mining can one attempt to argue otherwise.
Hermit wrote:
Mon Apr 09, 2018 6:42 am
Scot Dutchy wrote:The communist model was never very clear.
Well, there are hundreds, if not thousands of communist and socialist models and parties about. (Obligatory Monty Python clip right here) But when it comes to fundamental concepts, such as Marx's and Engels's concept of private property, there is no confusion despite the right wing nuts who try to tell us that under communism a woman will have her tampon ripped out by its string if a female party member has greater need of it.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Jason » Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:44 pm

:tup: Thanks Hermit

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 20981
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by laklak » Mon Oct 22, 2018 3:59 pm

You'll get my Breville espresso machine when you pry it out of my cold, dead hands.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 18529
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Cunt » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:03 pm

Are 3d printers/rapid prototypers 'private'? How about my Bridgeport? A sawmill?

There is a bit of over-simplification in thinking there is a clear line between private property and private property.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate

The 'Walsh Question' 'What Is A Woman?' I'll put an answer here when someone posts one that is clear and comprehensible, by apostates to the Faith.

Update: I've been offered one!
rainbow wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:23 pm
It is actually quite easy. A woman has at least one X chromosome.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Rum » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:33 pm

What Marx didn't realise I think is how deeply ingrained is the human desire for possessing. He was an optimist who assumed that as society 'progressed' and communism delivered (at some future time) the desire for profit and private ownership would fade as we became for too advanced for such petty considerations.

Sadly I think he was overly optimistic by some measure.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40340
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Svartalf » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:39 pm

Anybody who wants to rifle through my library will be greeted with belligerence.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Does Communism Necessitate the Abolition of Personal Possesions??

Post by Hermit » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:47 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:39 pm
Anybody who wants to rifle through my library will be greeted with belligerence.
It's as if you never read my reply to you. :roll:
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests