"Alt-right" Still Parading Ignorance, Stupidity, Malice, Etc.

[Svartalf]

They Petered out and fell into the frying Pan

[Cunt]

So you're actually defending the Proud Boys now, huh? Have fun with that.

First I've heard about the 'Proud Boys', but it sounds like they are a response to the lack of police support seen in many recent confrontations.

I don't need to defend them anyway. It sounds like they defend themselves. Does it scare you when people don't kowtow to ANTIFA and the rest of the black-clad, mask-wearing lefties?

[Seabass]

So you're actually defending the Proud Boys now, huh? Have fun with that.

First I've heard about the 'Proud Boys', but it sounds like they are a response to the lack of police support seen in many recent confrontations.

I don't need to defend them anyway. It sounds like they defend themselves. Does it scare you when people don't kowtow to ANTIFA and the rest of the black-clad, mask-wearing lefties?

So you're defending a gang about whom you know jack shit. What the hell is your point? To be an irritant?

[Cunt]

So you're actually defending the Proud Boys now, huh? Have fun with that.

First I've heard about the 'Proud Boys', but it sounds like they are a response to the lack of police support seen in many recent confrontations.

I don't need to defend them anyway. It sounds like they defend themselves. Does it scare you when people don't kowtow to ANTIFA and the rest of the black-clad, mask-wearing lefties?

So you're defending a gang about whom you know jack shit. What the hell is your point? To be an irritant?

I defend their right to defend themselves.

I don't see you answering whether you think they have the right to do that, but it doesn't matter. I already know what you think of opposing viewpoints. I copied it into my signature so I could remember easy.

[Seabass]

You'd be right about me if the Republican viewpoint was the only other viewpoint out there. It isn't, of course, so you are either an idiot or a troll. Although, I suppose you could be both.

By the way, I also oppose the Nazi viewpoint and the Boko Haram viewpoint. I'm such an intolerant bastard.

[Animavore]

Alt-Right Alt-Righting.

White Nationalist Richard Spencer’s Wife Says In Divorce Filings That He Physically And Emotionally Abused Her

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ta ... YTVBf5SaWM

[Cunt]

You'd be right about me if the Republican viewpoint was the only other viewpoint out there. It isn't, of course, so you are either an idiot or a troll. Although, I suppose you could be both.

By the way, I also oppose the Nazi viewpoint and the Boko Haram viewpoint. I'm such an intolerant bastard.

There are two parties (and a bunch of 'spoil-your-ballot' candidates) in the US. If you aren't one one side or the other, that's sensible enough, but your vote will be one of the two parties, or wasted on an independent.

And you can't respect anyone who doesn't come down on the same side as you. Classy and mature, Seabass. Or maybe I'm wrong about the classy part...

[pErvinalia]

Trump supporters (it's safe to assume) send pipe bombs to the Clintons, Obama, and CNN. But how about those SJWs hey?

[Seabass]

Trump supporters (it's safe to assume) send pipe bombs to the Clintons, Obama, and CNN. But how about those SJWs hey?

They want you to say "xir" instead of "her", rEv! The horror!!

[Cunt]

Trump supporters (it's safe to assume) send pipe bombs to the Clintons, Obama, and CNN. But how about those SJWs hey?

I don't agree that it is safe to assume.

I certainly think that you would believe that it is safe to assume.

How about those SJW's? Does one touch your pee-pee every time you say something mean about Trump supporters online?

[pErvinalia]

Great post.

Given the targets and Trump/Fox rhetoric, only you couldn't connect the dots.

[Seabass]

Evidently, there were misspellings on some of the packages. It was definitely a Trump supporter.

[Cunt]

What have the investigators said about it so far?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/10/ ... 07872.html

"The packages were immediately identified during routine mail screening procedures as potential explosive devices and were appropriately handled as such," the Secret Service said in a statement.

"The protectees did not receive the packages nor were they at risk of receiving them," it said.

Secret Service launched an investigation to find the source of the packages.

The New York City police commissioner said the package contained what appeared to be a live explosive and envelope containing white powder.

The package was addressed to former CIA Director John Brennan, CNN reported, citing city and local law enforcement officials. Brennan appears on other cable and broadcast networks.

According to the NYPD's chief of counterterrorism, the explosive appeared to be sent by the same person who mailed suspicious packages to the Clinton and Obama homes, as well as the device found on Monday at the home of billionaire philanthropist George Soros.

Looks like not much being said. It looks pretty crude and simple, so could be an idiot for any random idiot reason (idiocy knows no bounds)

If it was a political move of some kind, it sure looks dumb. I don't really see how it could benefit either side, but they haven't really said much about their investigation yet.

[Brian Peacock]

"Blow her up! Blow her up!"

[Cunt]

A sudden glut of bombs not going off does sound quite unusual. Anyone know how often such things are found in the normal mail screening?