Sean said it well.Cunt wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 7:08 pmIs that why some refer to him as 'No-name'?
I've wondered awhile about that reference.
I've read what I need to, but my specialty isn't law, politics or international relations.Joe wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 2:41 pmYou should read it so you can make up your own mind instead of reciting nonsense others spoon-fed you. Remember, both sides are spinning it for their own purposes. It's not that you'll learn something that was missed. You'll learn what was lied about or ignored.
I doubt you'll do that. It would be work after all.
I do trust, though, that every Democrat who IS specializing in that, had access to the whole report, and used every bit of ammo it provided.
With all that ammo, their efforts have come to nothing.
So what am I supposed to believe?
That it means something important, but the officials decided not to use it?
What are you trying to convince me of, exactly?
Or not.You'd have to read what was found and decide for yourself.
It's your credibility pal.